Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 5264 Patna
Judgement Date : 6 August, 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.9716 of 2024
======================================================
Infrastructure Development Authority, a Government of Bihar undertaking
constituted under the Bihar State Infrastructure Development Enabling Act,
2006 having its office at 1st Floor, Udyog Bhawan, East Gandhi Maidan,
Patna-800004 through its Authorized Signatory, Sanjeev Kumar, son of N. K.
Prasad, aged about 54 years, Male, resident of R.N. Villa Apartment, M.G.
Nagar, Kankarbagh, P.O. Bahadurpur Housing Colony, P.S.- Agam Kuan,
Patna - 800026
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, TDS Circle, Patna.
... ... Respondent/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ajay Kumar Rastogi, Sr. Advocate
Ms. Smriti Singh, Advocate
For the Respondent/s : Mrs. Archana Sinha, Sr. SC, Income Tax Dept.
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE
and
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY
ORAL JUDGMENT
(Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE)
Date : 06-08-2024
The writ petition is filed against Annexures-P/1 and
P/2 orders, which resulted in rejection of applications filed
under Section 197 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The orders are
dated 14.05.2023 and 30.01.2024 respectively and relate to the
same issue.
2. The petitioner had sought for deduction of TDS in
the interest income earned from banks at NIL, since the
petitioner's contention was that the total income justifies such
benefit under Section 197. The orders impugned only found that
there was a tax demand with respect to the Assessment Year Patna High Court CWJC No.9716 of 2024 dt.06-08-2024
2018-19, which is pending and hence the deduction at the lower
rate/NIL rate is not possible.
3. Learned Senior Counsel appearing for the petitioner
would contend that the tax demand for the year 2018-19 has
been stayed by the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax till
the First Appeal is disposed of.
4. De hors the stay ordered; pending First Appeal, we
see that the provision under Section 197 only clothes the
Assessing Officer with the power to satisfy himself that the
total income of the recipient justifies the deduction of Income
Tax at any lower rates or at a NIL rate. Hence, a demand
pending against the assessee would not clothe the Assessing
Officer with the power to summarily reject an application under
Section 197. The satisfaction to be recorded under Section 197
is clearly with respect to the total income of the recipient for the
subject assessment year, where the deduction is claimed at a
NIL rate for the interest income earned from the fixed deposits
in banks.
5. We set aside Annexures P/1 and P/2 orders for
having decided the issue on extraneous considerations. The
application will stand restored before the Assessing Officer and
the same will be considered in accordance with law, as Patna High Court CWJC No.9716 of 2024 dt.06-08-2024
interpreted by us hereinabove.
6. The writ petition stands disposed of.
(K. Vinod Chandran, CJ)
(Partha Sarthy, J) P.K.P./-
AFR/NAFR CAV DATE Uploading Date 07.08.2024. Transmission Date
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!