Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 5221 Patna
Judgement Date : 5 August, 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.13687 of 2017
======================================================
Anuj Kumar Son of Late Ramjee Mahto, Resident of Village-Dayali Bigha,
P.O.-Keoti, P.S.-Barbigha, District-Sheikhpura.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. National Highways Authority Of India, New Delhi
2. Director National Highways Authority of India, New Delhi.
3. Project Director, National Highways Authority of India, Munger
4. Competent Authority-cum-District Land Acquisition Officer, Sheikhpura,
Bihar.
5. The State of Bihar through the District Magistrate, Sheikhpura, Bihar.
... ... Respondent/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Kumar Malendu, Advocate
For the NHAI : Mr. Kumar Gautam, Advocate
For the Respondent/s : Mr. Raj Kishore Roy, GP-18
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH
MISHRA
ORAL JUDGMENT
Date : 05-08-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned
counsel for the State.
2. The present writ application has been filed for
the following reliefs:-
"I. Directing the Respondents-
authorities to pay the amount of compensation to
the petitioner as per the Valuation of land/house as
contained in report dated 21.07.2016 (Annexure-3)
on account of being acquired for construction of
National Highways No. 82 (Biharshariff-Barbhiga- Patna High Court CWJC No.13687 of 2017 dt.05-08-2024
Mokamaha Section) as published in Extra
Ordinary Gazette of India on 30.10.2015 and
published in Prabhat Khabar, Patna Edition a
Hindi daily on 13.05.2016 (Annexure-1) of Mouza-
Keoti in the District Sheikhpura.
II. Directing the Respondents to apply
provisions of rehabilitation and resettlement as
envisaged u/s 31 of the Right to Fair Compensation
and Transparency in Land Acquisition,
Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 (in short
the Act, 2013)
III. Any other relief and reliefs for
which the petitioner may be found entitled to."
3. At the outset, learned counsel for the State
submits that the petitioner is having alternative remedy under
Section 3G(5) of the National Highways Act, 1956 by way of
filing appropriate application before competent authority, i.e.
Arbitrator appointed by the Central Government.
4. Considering the aforesaid fact that the alternative
remedy is already available to the petitioner as per Section
3G(5) of the National Highways Act, 1956, the petitioner is
directed to file appropriate application within four weeks from Patna High Court CWJC No.13687 of 2017 dt.05-08-2024
today along with relevant documents including the application
for condonation of delay, if any, before the competent authority,
i.e. Arbitrator which is appointed by the Central Government. If
any such application is filed, the concerned authority shall
condone the delay, if any, as the petitioner was pursuing the
remedy before this Court, and shall consider and dispose of the
same in accordance with law.
5. With the aforesaid observation/direction, the
present writ application stands disposed of.
(Rudra Prakash Mishra, J) Alok Verma/-
Pankaj/-
AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE N/A Uploading Date 09.08.2024 Transmission Date N/A
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!