Wednesday, 20, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Subodh Kumar vs The Union Of India Through The Secretary
2024 Latest Caselaw 5218 Patna

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 5218 Patna
Judgement Date : 5 August, 2024

Patna High Court

Subodh Kumar vs The Union Of India Through The Secretary on 5 August, 2024

Author: Chief Justice

Bench: Chief Justice

         IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.11636 of 2024
     ======================================================
     Subodh Kumar Son of Akhileshwar Lal Das Resident of Village- Betauna,
     Benipatti, Police Station- Benipatti, District- Madhubani.

                                                                    ... ... Petitioner/s
                                         Versus

1.   The Union of India through the Secretary, Ministry of Finance, Government
     of India, New Delhi.

2.   The Chairman, Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Custom, Government of
     India, New Delhi.

3.   The Chief Commissioner, Custom, Central Excise and Service Tax (Now
     Central Goods and Service Tax), Central Revenue Building (Annexe),
     Birchand Patel Path, Patna.

4.   The Assistant Commissioner, CGST and Central Excise, CCO, Ranchi Zone,
     Central Revenue Building (Annexe), Birchand Patel Path, Patna.

5.   The Assistant Commissioner, CGST and CX Division, Darbhanga.

6.   The Superintendent CGST, Madhubani Range, Madhubani.

7.   The Chief Engineer, Bihar State Education Infrastructure Development
     Corporation Limited, Patna.

8.   The Principal Secretary, Planning            and   Development      Department,
     Government of Bihar, Patna.

9.   The Executive Engineer, Local Area Engineering Organization, Works
     Division-1, Madhubani.

10. The Engineer in Chief, Building Construction Department, Government of
    Bihar, Patna.

11. The Executive Engineer, Building Construction Department, Madhubani.


                                               ... ... Respondent/s
     ======================================================
     Appearance :
     For the Petitioner/s   :       Mr. Narendra Kumar, Advocate
     For the Respondent/s   :       Dr. K. N. Singh, Additional Solicitor General
                                    Mr. Anshuman Singh, Sr. SC, CGST & CX
                                    Mr. Devansh Shankar Singh, Advocate,
 Patna High Court CWJC No.11636 of 2024 dt.05-08-2024
                                           2/3




                                        Mr. Harsh Anil Singh, Advocate
                                        Mr. Prabhat Kumar Singh, Advocate
       ======================================================
       CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE
               and
               HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NANI TAGIA
       ORAL JUDGMENT
       (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE)

         Date : 05-08-2024

                          The petitioner is aggrieved with Annexure-4 order

         passed under the Finance Act, 1994 for the year 2015-16. The

         show-cause notice for the said year was issued on 22.01.2021

         and the limitation on grounds 'inter-alia' of suppression of facts

         leading to evasion, is 5 years under Section 73 (1). The show-

         cause notice issued on 22.01.2021 is within the 5 year period

         from the due date of filing returns, which is 25.10.2015 and

         25.04.2016

, for the two half yearly returns as per Section 7 of

the Service Tax Rules, 1994.

2. The petitioner's contention is that the petitioner

is a person who has done only government contracts in the

period which is exempted from the purview of the Finance Act,

1994. The petitioner has a remedy by way of an appeal under

the Finance Act, 1994. The question of exemption is a mixed

question of law and fact; the exemption flowing from a

notification issued by the Central Government and the facts to

be ascertained, being the exact contracts which were carried out

by the assessee. In such circumstances, it is only proper that the Patna High Court CWJC No.11636 of 2024 dt.05-08-2024

assessee shall approach the appellate authority, which liberty is

conceded with just exceptions.

3. There is no observation on merits and the writ

petition would stand dismissed only on refusing to exercise the

discretion under Article 226 in such matters, where an

efficacious alternate remedy is available.

(K. Vinod Chandran, CJ)

( Nani Tagia, J) sharun/-

AFR/NAFR
CAV DATE
Uploading Date            08.08.2024.
Transmission Date
 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter