Tuesday, 19, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Rabindra Kumar Pandey And Ors vs The State Of Bihar And Ors
2024 Latest Caselaw 5145 Patna

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 5145 Patna
Judgement Date : 1 August, 2024

Patna High Court

Rabindra Kumar Pandey And Ors vs The State Of Bihar And Ors on 1 August, 2024

Author: Harish Kumar

Bench: Harish Kumar

         IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                  Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.5867 of 2018
     ======================================================
1.    Rabindra Kumar Pandey, S/o Late Narvadeshwar Pandey @ Baban Pandey.
2.   Jitendra Kumar Pandey, S/o Late Narvadeshwar Pandey @ Baban Pandey.
3.   Kanti Devi, W/o Late Narvadeshwar Pandey @ Baban Pandey. All resident
     of Village- Ayear, P.S.- Ayear, District- Bhojpur.
                                                         ... ... Petitioner/s
                                          Versus
1.   The State Of Bihar.
2.   The District Collector, Bhojpur.
3.   The Addl. Collector, Bhojpur, Aarah.
4.   The Deputy Collector, Land Reforms, Sadar Aarah, Bhojpur.
5.   The Circle Officer, Sahaar, Bhojpur.
                                               ... ... Respondent/s
     ======================================================
     Appearance :
     For the Petitioner/s   :      Mr. Subhash Kumar Mishra, Adv.
     For the Respondent/s   :      Mr. Dhurjati Kumar Prasad, GP-14
     ======================================================
     CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH KUMAR
     ORAL JUDGMENT
      Date : 01-08-2024

                      Heard Mr. Subhash Kumar Mishra, learned counsel

      for the petitioners and Mr. Dhurjati Kumar Prasad, learned

      counsel for the State.

                  2. During the pendency of the writ petition, the

      petitioner no.3 died on 21.02.2020. Since the legal heirs of

      petitioner no.3 has already arrayed as petitioners no.1 and 2 in

      the writ petition, there is no need of any substitution.

                  3. In the aforesaid premise, learned counsel for the

      petitioners seeks to expunge the name of petitioner no.3 from

      the writ petition. For the said purpose, I.A. No. 1 of 2024 has

      been filed.

                  4. In view thereof, I.A. No. 1 of 2024 stands allowed.
 Patna High Court CWJC No.5867 of 2018 dt.01-08-2024
                                           2/3




                     5. Let the name of petitioner no.3 be expunged from

         the writ petition.

                                      C.W.J.C. No. 5867 of 2018

                     6. The petitioners by invoking the extraordinary writ

         jurisdiction of this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution

         of India, seek a direction upon the respondent authorities to

         ensure mutation of the land in the name of the petitioners

         pursuant to the order dated 22.04.2013 passed in Land Ceiling

         Case Nos. 3/78-79 and 1/82-83 by Deputy Collector Land

         Reforms, Sadar, Aarah. The aforesaid order has also been

         confirmed by the Additional Collector, Bhojpur, Aarah vide

         order dated 11.09.2013. Despite the application filed before the

         Circle Officer, Sahar, Bhojpur, when it has not been brought to

         its logical conclusion, the petitioners approached before this

         Court.

                     7. Learned counsel for the State straightway drew the

         attention of this Court to the averments made in the counter

         affidavit, especially in para-5 thereof and submitted that on

         receipt of the copy of the writ petition, the Circle Officer, Sahar

         verified its official record, however, no application was found

         pending for mutation filed by the petitioners. It is further

         contended that two mutation applications giving rise to

         Mutation Case No. 308 R 27/2020-21/Sahar and Mutation Case

         No. 306 R 27/2020-21/Sahar were filed by petitioners no. 1 and
              Patna High Court CWJC No.5867 of 2018 dt.01-08-2024
                                                        3/3




                      2, but both the applications came to be dismissed in view of the

                      reasons assigned therein vide orders dated 27.02.2022 and

                      01.10.2021

, respectively.

8. Adverting to the aforesaid facts, learned counsel for

the State, thus submitted that if the petitioners have still any

grievance, they have remedy to assail the order(s) before the

DCLR under Section 7 of the Bihar Land Mutation Act, 2011.

There is further provision of revision under Section 8 and

subsequent thereto, the Bihar Land Tribunal is the remedy. In

such circumstances, filing of the present writ petition is

misconceived and not maintainable on account of a statutory

alternative remedy.

9. This Court finds substance in the submission of

learned counsel for the State and found no merit in the writ

petition. However, for the ends of justice, the writ petition

stands disposed of with a liberty to the petitioners to avail the

remedy of appeal under Section 7 of the Bihar Land Mutation

Act, 2011, if not satisfied with the order passed by the Circle

Officer, Sahar, Bhojpur.

(Harish Kumar, J) rohit/-

AFR/NAFR                NAFR
CAV DATE                NA
Uploading Date          02-08-2024
Transmission Date
 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter