Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 796 Patna
Judgement Date : 16 February, 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.7275 of 2019
======================================================
Ram Janaki Mahanth Triveni Das Madhyamik Sah Uchch Madhyamik Vidyalaya Rathore Nevaji Tola, Saran at Chhapra through its Principal Amiteshwar Singh, aged about 53 years, (M) Son of Late Janardan Singh, P.S.- Chhapra Mufassil, District- Saran at Chhapra, Bihar.
... ... Petitioner/s Versus
1. The State of Bihar through Principal Secretary, Education Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.
2. Principal Secretary, Education Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.
3. Director, Education Department (Secondary Education), Government of Bihar, Patna.
4. Bihar School Examination Board through its Secretary, Patna, Bihar.
5. Chairman, Bihar School Examination Board, Patna.
6. Secretary, Bihar School Examination Board, Patna.
7. District Magistrate, Saran at Chhapra.
8. Additional Collector, Saran at Chhapra.
9. The District Education Officer, Saran at Chhapra.
... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Yashraj Bardhan, Adv. For the State : Mr. Jai Prabhat Kishore, A.C. to S.C.-13 For the B.S.E.B. : Mr. Satyabir Bharti, Adv.
Mr. Abhishek Anand, Adv.
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA
ORAL JUDGMENT
Date : 16-02-2023
1. Heard the parties.
2. The issue raised in the present writ petition is no more
res-integra in view of the judgment passed by the Division Bench in
bunch of L.P.As. decided on 04.04.2022 and reported in 2022 (3)
BLJ 135 (Bihar School Examination Board & Ors. Vs. Rambalak
Prasad Singh & Ors.).
3. The Division Bench reached to conclusion that it is the
Board, which has the powers to examine the issue regarding granting
of affiliation and the Chairman in his indivisional capacity would not Patna High Court CWJC No.7275 of 2019 dt.16-02-2023
be empowered to issue directions for affiliation or de-affiliation. The
Single Judge held otherwise which was set aside by the Division
Bench.
4. In the present case, the Board has conducted an
inspection and thereafter issued show cause and after considering the
reply of the petitioner has taken a decision on 27.11.2018. The order
passed by the Secretary, Board in terms of the decision of the Board,
therefore, does not warrant any interference. However, it would be
apposite to quote following observations of the Division Bench
(supra):-
"48. However after having said that, we are of
the view that if the impugned decision of the Board,
disaffiliating the institutions was taken also on the ground
of lack of infrastructure and the schools were not given
time to upgrade, it would be in the interest and betterment
of academics in the State of Bihar and for the benefit of
larger good that the respondents/institutions be given the
liberty to make a fresh application for revival of their
affiliation/grant of fresh affiliation which is permitted under
Clause 8 of Regulation 15 which shall be considered on its
merits by the Affiliation Committee.
49. For all practical purposes, any decision
with respect to revival of the affiliation would include the
conditions which are necessary for grant of affiliation in the
first instance.
Patna High Court CWJC No.7275 of 2019 dt.16-02-2023
50. We, therefore, direct that the Board while
taking a decision on such application so filed by the
respective schools will not take the plea that frequent
violation of the bye-laws has led to any permanent
disaffiliation of the schools.
51. Needless to state that the Board shall look
into all aspects of the matter and shall take a decision for
granting fresh affiliation or revival of the affiliation, if the
institutions in question have the requisite standing in terms
of infrastructure and other conditions specified in the Act
and the Regulation for grant of such affiliation.
52. While taking any decision, the provisions
contained in the Act and the Rules shall be strictly adhered
to."
5. The aforesaid directions issued by the Division Bench
would apply mutatis mutandis to the present case of the petitioner
also.
6. Accordingly, the writ petition stands disposed of.
(Sanjeev Prakash Sharma, J) lata/-
Item No.54 AFR/NAFR CAV DATE Uploading Date Transmission Date
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!