Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 6048 Patna
Judgement Date : 14 December, 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.17640 of 2023
======================================================
M/s Nidhi Kumari, having its office at Telpa, Nai Basti, Post-Chhapra, P.S.-
Chhapra, Saran-841301, Bihar through its Proprietor Nidhi Kumari (female,
aged about 25 years) daughter of Shri Sunil Singh, resident of Telpa, Nai
Basti, Post-Chhapra, P.S.-Chhapra, Saran-841301, Bihar.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, State Tax, Bihar, Patna having
its office at Vikas Bhawan, Patna.
2. The Principal Secretary cum Commissioner, Department of State Taxes,
Government of Bihar, Patna.
3. The Additional Commissioner of State Taxes, Saran Division, Chhapra,
Government of Bihar.
4. The Joint Commissioner of State Taxes, Saran Circle, Chhapra, Government
of Bihar, Bihar.
... ... Respondent/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Manish Kumar, Advocate
For the Respondent/s : Mr. Vikash Kumar (SC-11)
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE
and
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY
ORAL JUDGMENT
(Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE)
Date : 14-12-2023
The petitioner is aggrieved with the cancellation of
registration by Annexure-P2 dated 19.07.2021. An appeal was
filed which was dismissed for delay occasioned by Annexure-
P4 dated 22.09.2023.
2. The learned Government Advocate submits that
there was an Amnesty Scheme available whereby an application
for revocation of cancellation would have facilitated the same
and the revival of registration. It is also submitted that the Patna High Court CWJC No.17640 of 2023 dt.14-12-2023
facility was available between 31.03.2023 to 31.08.2023. The
petitioner having not availed of this remedy cannot now file a
writ petition, especially when the appeal itself was delayed.
3. We are quite conscious of the delay occasioned and
the restriction insofar as invocation of the extraordinary remedy
under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. However, in the
present case, it is a fact that the order issued does not show any
reason nor does the notice raise any allegation against the
petitioner of not having filed returns for a continuous period of
six months; as stated by the learned counsel. Only in the
circumstance of no reasons having been shown, we are of the
opinion that the order has to be interfered with. The order also
does not clearly indicate the failure to file the return despite the
fact that the petitioner has not filed any reply to the show cause
notice issued. The appeal filed also stood rejected without any
consideration.
4. We set aside Annexure-P2 order for it being devoid
of any reasoning and Annexure-P4 also, but conditionally on the
following undertaking made by the petitioner.
5. The undertaking made by the petitioner before
Court is that the entire tax, interest and penalty would be paid
within a period of one month from today and the returns filed Patna High Court CWJC No.17640 of 2023 dt.14-12-2023
accordingly. If the said undertaking is compiled with, the
petitioner's registration shall be restored, and if not, the
registration shall stand cancelled, as has been ordered in
Annexure-P2.
6. The writ petition stands allowed in the aforesaid
terms.
(K. Vinod Chandran, CJ)
(Rajiv Roy, J) Sunil/-
AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE Uploading Date 18.12.2023 Transmission Date
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!