Tuesday, 19, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

M/S Aarini Development Pvt. Ltd vs The State Of Bihar
2023 Latest Caselaw 4099 Patna

Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 4099 Patna
Judgement Date : 28 August, 2023

Patna High Court
M/S Aarini Development Pvt. Ltd vs The State Of Bihar on 28 August, 2023
         IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                    Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.4912 of 2023
     ======================================================

M/s Aarini Development Pvt. Ltd. through its Director Manish Kumar Singh, Gender-Male, aged about-36 Years, Son of -Late Murli Manohar Singh, Resident of Mithila Colony, Nashriganj, P.S.-Digha, District-Patna.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Urban Development and Housing Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

2. The District Magistrate, Patna.

3. The Executive Officer, Nagar Parishad, Daughter Nizamat,

4. The Officers In-Charge, Danapur Police Station, Danapur.

5. Nagendra Rai Son of Mahaveer Rai R/o-Ram Jaipal Nagar, Tirumala Colony, P.S.-Rupaspur, District-Patna.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Bibhuti Narayan, Advocate. For the Respondent/s : Mr. Subhash Pd. Singh, GA-3. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH KUMAR ORAL JUDGMENT Date : 28-08-2023

Heard the learned counsel for the parties.

2. The petitioner having been entered into a

development agreement on 23.11.2019 for construction of

residential building and also agreed to develop the said land

and offered to built multi-storeyed residential complex over

the land with the owner of the land approach before this Court

seeking quashing of the order contained Memo No.3025,

dated 08.07.2022 issued by the respondent no.3, the Executive Patna High Court CWJC No.4912 of 2023 dt.28-08-2023

Officer, Nagar Parishad, Danapur Nizamat whereby the

petitioner has been restrained from making construction and

further directed to submit his reply. The petitioner further

seeks quashing of the letter no.5347, dated 17.11.2022

whereby further notice has been issued to the petitioner

directing him to stop the construction.

3. A submission has been made on behalf of the

petitioner that on a complaint filed by one Nagendra Rai

before the Real Estate Regulatory Authority (RERA) vide

Complaint Case No.CC/1618/2020, the proceeding has been

initiated and finally the matter went up to the Division Bench

of this Court in LPA No. 263 of 2022, which came to be

dismissed on 18.10.2022, in the meantime, the respondent

no.3 without taking into consideration the above mentioned

facts issued the impugned letter as contained in Memo No.

3025, dated 08.07.2022, directing the petitioner to stop the

construction work and further a similar notice has also been

issued as contained in letter no.5347, dated 17.11.2022, which

are impugned herein. It is further submitted that in response to

the aforesaid letter, petitioner submitted his reply and

requested to grant further extension for construction of work,

as due to the order issued by the Nagar Parisad restraining him Patna High Court CWJC No.4912 of 2023 dt.28-08-2023

from making construction over the land, the same could not be

done.

4. After some argument, learned counsel for the

petitioner fairly submits that against the order passed by the

Executive Officer, Nagar Parisad, Danapur, there is a remedy

of appeal before the Municipal Building Tribunal, under

Section 323(3) and he is under obligation to assail the order

before the Building Tribunal, however, by the time he will

move the Building Tribunal, let there shall be no coercive

action against the petitioner, so that in the meantime any

prejudice would not be caused to him. For the said purpose he

prays for four weeks time to file an appropriate appeal against

the order impugned herein.

5. Considering the submissions made on behalf of

the petitioner, the present writ application stands disposed of

with a liberty to the petitioner to file an appeal before the

Municipal Building Tribunal, preferably within a period of

four weeks from today.

6. It is need less to observe that if such appeal is

filed within the aforesaid period the same shall be considered

taking into account that the matter was pending before this

Court and till that time there shall be no coercive action Patna High Court CWJC No.4912 of 2023 dt.28-08-2023

against the petitioner.

7. Accordingly, the present writ application stands

disposed of with the aforesaid liberty.

(Harish Kumar, J) manoj/-

AFR/NAFR                NAFR
CAV DATE                NA
Uploading Date          30.08.2023
Transmission Date       NA
 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter