Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 3838 Patna
Judgement Date : 18 August, 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.11546 of 2023
======================================================
Aman Kumar, Son of Pawan Prasad, Resident of Village-Ramdohar, Anchal- cum-Block-Dumariya, District-Gaya.
... ... Petitioner/s Versus
1. The State of Bihar through the Chief Secretary, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.
2. The Chief Secretary, Government of Bihar, Patna.
3. The Additional Chief Secretary, Rural Development Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.
4. The Director, Vigilance Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.
5. The Development Commissioner, Bihar, Patna.
6. The District Magistrate, Gaya.
7. The Deputy Development Commissioner Gaya.
8. The Sub Divisional Officer, Sherghati, Gaya.
9. The Accommodation Assistant (Aawash Sahayak), Aawash Yojana, Rural Development Department, Gaya.
10. The Executive Engineer, Aawash Yojana, Rural Development Department, Gaya.
... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Birendra Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. P.K. Shahi (AG) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY ORAL JUDGMENT (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE)
Date : 18-08-2023
The writ petition is in the nature of a public interest
litigation seeking a mandamus or an appropriate order
commanding the respondents to conduct proper investigation of
financial irregularities of Block-Dumariya, District-Gaya, in the
implementation of Pradhan Mantri Awas Yojana (PMAY). It is Patna High Court CWJC No.11546 of 2023 dt.18-08-2023
also prayed that the Director, Vigilance Department,
Government of Bihar, Patna may conduct a proper investigation
into the relationship between the Block authority and the Bank
which was involved in the illegal transaction of money.
2. Neither the Bank has been named or impleaded nor
is the impleadment of officials, who are alleged to have
misappropriated money, carried out in their personal capacity.
The petitioner merely assumes that there has been
embezzlement of money under the PMAY without any
substantiation. Annexure-3 is said to be a report of the District
Authority wherein nine persons are alleged to have been given
benefits of the scheme, who happen to be husband and wife. An
explanation has been called for, but again none of these nine
persons have been impleaded here. Again in paragraph-12, it has
been stated that in the financial year 2021-22, the following
persons were issued with the benefits under the scheme, but the
money was transferred to a different account. One of the persons
referred to has also given a complaint as per Annexure-5.
3. We are of the opinion that there are little facts
available to order an enquiry and in any event, the authorities
have been apprised of some irregularities. As we noticed, none
of the persons against whom allegations are raised, have been Patna High Court CWJC No.11546 of 2023 dt.18-08-2023
impleaded and it is not proper for this Court to direct a roving
enquiry to be conducted, also based on very scanty material.
4. The writ petition would stand closed, but however
without prejudice to any enquiry carried out by the District
Authorities.
(K. Vinod Chandran, CJ)
(Partha Sarthy, J) Sunil/-
AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE Uploading Date 22.08.2023 Transmission Date
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!