Monday, 18, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Rampati Devi vs The State Of Bihar
2023 Latest Caselaw 3560 Patna

Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 3560 Patna
Judgement Date : 8 August, 2023

Patna High Court
Rampati Devi vs The State Of Bihar on 8 August, 2023
          IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                    Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.7041 of 2023
     ======================================================

Rampati Devi Wife of Ram Ekbal Ray, resident of village - Pakari Ismile, P.O. Ladaura, P.S. Muzaffarpur Sadar, District - Muzaffarpur, the retired Maid Servant, P.G. Girls Hostel, B.R.A Bihar University, Muzaffarpur.

... ... Petitioner/s Versus

1. The State of Bihar through the Chief Secretary, Government of Bihar, Patna.

2. The Principal Secretary, Education Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

3. The Director Higher Education, Education Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

4. The Vice Chancellor B.R.A. Bihar University, Muzaffarpur.

5. The Registrar, B.R.A. Bihar University, Muzaffarpur.

6. The Finance Officer, B.R.A. Bihar University, Muzaffarpur.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Vijay Kumar Singh, Advocate For the State : Mr. Hitesh Suman, AC to SC-13 For the University : Mr. Indrajesh Kumar, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PURNENDU SINGH ORAL JUDGMENT Date : 08-08-2023 Heard Mr. Vijay Kumar Singh, learned counsel

appearing on behalf of the petitioner, Mr. Hitesh Suman, learned

AC to SC-13 appearing on behalf of the State and Mr. Indrajesh

Kumar, learned counsel for the B.R.A. Bihar University,

Muzaffarpur.

2. The present writ petition has been filed for

following relief(s) :

"For issuance of an appropriate writ in the nature of MANDAMUS, commanding and directing the Respondent Authorities for payment of following retiral dues of the petitioner counting his services from the date of his initial appointment i.e. 14.01.1985 for which he is entitled in view of his Patna High Court CWJC No.7041 of 2023 dt.08-08-2023

retirement from service on 31.01.2020:-

a) Pension:

(b) General Provident Fund

(c) Leave Encashment

(d) Gratuity:

(e) Group Insurance

(f) Other benefits for which the petitioner is legally entitled but it has not been paid to the petitioner

(II) for issuance of an appropriate writ in the nature of MANDAMUS commanding and directing the respondent authorities to pay the aforesaid amount to the petitioner with interest till it is actually paid to him on the ground that for any delay caused in the payment of retirement benefits attributable to the respondents, the petitioner cannot be made to suffer in the evening of his life.

(III) For issuance of any other appropriate writ writs order/ orders, direction/directions for which the writ petitioner shall be found entitled under the facts and circumstances of the case."

3. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the

petitioner submits that the petitioner had retired on 31.01.2020.

However, he has not been paid G.P.F., leave encashment, group

insurance etc. along with pension and gratuity.

4. Learned counsel submits that the case of the

petitioner is squarely covered by the Judgment dated

25.07.2016, passed by this Court in C.W.J.C. No. 6476 of 2013

(Ramjee Paswan & Ors. Vrs. The Baba Saheb Bim Rao

Ambedkar University & Ors.) as well as the Judgment dated

30.08.2018, passed in C.W.J.C. No. 6368 of 2012 (Ramanand Patna High Court CWJC No.7041 of 2023 dt.08-08-2023

Thakur & Ors. Vrs. The State of Bihar).

5. The petitioner seeks to file comprehensive

representation before the Registrar of the University.

6. The Registrar of the University must dispose of

the representation after giving proper opportunity of hearing

and on the consideration of records relating to the petitioner

pass final order in terms of the judgment/orders relied by the

petitioner. In case, it is found that in case of any similarly

situated employee, payments have been made, the petitioner

must be given the same benefit forthwith.

7. The representation of the petitioner is directed to

be considered and disposed of in accordance with law and

payments, if admissible, be made along with statutory interest

on account of delay payment within six weeks.

8. Accordingly, the present writ petition is disposed

of.

(Purnendu Singh, J) Niraj/Nilmani AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE N/A Uploading Date 09.08.2023 Transmission Date N/A

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter