Monday, 18, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Mathura Nand Prasad @ Mathuranand ... vs The State Of Bihar
2022 Latest Caselaw 2874 Patna

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 2874 Patna
Judgement Date : 16 May, 2022

Patna High Court
Mathura Nand Prasad @ Mathuranand ... vs The State Of Bihar on 16 May, 2022
          IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                   CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No 34696 of 2021
                     Arising Out of PS. Case No.- Year-0 Thana- District- Nalanda
     ======================================================

MATHURA NAND PRASAD @ MATHURANAND PRASAD SINGH S/o Sri Bijendra Singh R/o village- Seudah, P.S.- Harnaut (Chero O.P.), District- Nalanda

... ... Petitioner/s Versus

1. The State of Bihar Bihar

2. Chandrawati Devi @ Prachi Sinha @ Premlata Sinha @ Chandeshwari Devi D/o Shivaji Singh @ Shivnarayan Singh R/o village- Telmar, P.S.- Telmar, District- Nalanda

3. Mallu Singh @ Manish Kumar S/o Late Nageshwar Singh R/o village-

Telmar, P.S.- Telmar, District- Nalanda

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

     For the Petitioner/s       :        Mr D K Sinha, Sr Advocate with
                                         Mr Abhinay Raj, Advocate
     For the S t a t e          :        Ms Pushpa Sinha, APP

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE MADHURESH PRASAD

ORAL JUDGMENT

Date : 16-05-2022

Heard learned senior counsel for the petitioner and the

learned Additional Public Prosecutor (for brevity, APP) appearing

for the State of Bihar.

2 The petitioner has assailed the order dated 01.02.2021

passed by Principal Judge, Family Court, Nalanda in

Miscellaneous Case No 11 of 2011 arising out of Maintenance

Case No 42 (M) of 2009.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.34696 of 2021 dt.16-05-2022

3 Mr D K Sinha, learned senior counsel for the

petitioner submits that pursuant to the order of Maintenance dated

05.05.2011, affirmed by this Court in Criminal Revision No 710 of

2011 as well as in terms of the undertaking recorded in order dated

05.08.2016 passed by this Court in Cr Misc No 39907 of 2015, the

petitioner has made the deposits.

4 He submits that otherwise also the complainant has no

case as she is living in adultery and is also earning.

5 The brief background in which this application has

been filed is that the petitioner has been directed to deposit Rs

3,000/- per month maintenance by the Principal Judge, Family

Court, Nalanda in Miscellaneous Case No 11 of 2011 arising out

of Maintenance Case No 42 (M) of 2009. The same was affirmed

by this Court subsequently in Criminal Revision No 710 of 2011

wherein the petitioner had assailed the order dated 05.05.2011

passed in Miscellaneous Case No 11 of 2011. The records further

reveal that the petitioner subsequently had approached this Court

by way of Criminal Miscellaneous No 39907 of 2015 wherein the

petitioner had expressed his willingness to make payment of

arrears of maintenance allowance, as awarded in Maintenance

Case No 11 of 2011. In view of such submission, the matter was

adjourned and stay was granted in respect of Miscellaneous Case Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.34696 of 2021 dt.16-05-2022

No 11 of 2011 arising out of Maintenance Case No 42 (M) of

2009.

6 The learned senior counsel for the petitioner submits

that in spite of the stay remaining operative and in spite of the fact

that the petitioner has honoured his undertaking given in Criminal

Miscellaneous No 39907 of 2015 by making deposit of an amount

of Rs 2,04,000/-, Principal Judge, Family Court has passed an

order dated 01.02.2021 directing the petitioner to make deposit of

the arrears which have accrued in the meantime. It is submitted

that the order of the Principal Judge is in violation of the stay

granted in Criminal Miscellaneous No 39907 of 2015.

7 Learned APP has drawn attention of the Court towards

the order dated 01.02.2021. She has submitted that the order

passed by the Principal Judge is in terms of the order passed by the

Hon'ble Apex Court in Criminal Appeals No 1375 - 1376 of 2013

in the case of Asian Resurfacing of Road Agency P Ltd & Anr

-Versus- Central Bureau of Investigation and, therefore, there is no

infirmity in the order.

8 The Court is of the view that since the petitioner

alleges the impugned order to be contrary to the interim order

passed in Criminal Miscellaneous No 39907 of 2015, it would be

appropriate for the petitioner to bring the developments leading to Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.34696 of 2021 dt.16-05-2022

passing of the order dated 01.02.2021 by the Principal Judge,

Family Court, Nalanda on the records and to the notice of this

Court in the already pending Criminal Miscellaneous No 39907 of

2015.

9 For the same, these parallel proceedings are

undesirable, to say the least. Such multiplicity of litigation, when

it is alleged that the impugned order is in violation of the interim

order passed by this Court in earlier case (Criminal Miscellaneous

No 39907 of 2015) which is still pending, is not warranted.

10 The petitioner, needless to say, is at liberty to raise all

the issues before this Court in the pending Criminal Miscellaneous

No 39907 of 2015.

11 This application stands disposed of.

(Madhuresh Prasad, J) M.E.H./-

AFR/NAFR                  NAFR
CAV DATE                    NA
Uploading Date          18.05.2022
Transmission Date       18.05.2022
 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter