Monday, 18, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Ravindra Prasad Yadav vs The State Of Bihar
2022 Latest Caselaw 2810 Patna

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 2810 Patna
Judgement Date : 12 May, 2022

Patna High Court
Ravindra Prasad Yadav vs The State Of Bihar on 12 May, 2022
         IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                   Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.6207 of 2022
     ======================================================

Ravindra Prasad Yadav, Son of Yugal Prasad Yadav, Resident Village Bhirkhi, Ward No. 21, P.S. - Madhepura, District - Madhepura.

... ... Petitioner/s Versus

1. The State of Bihar, through the Secretory Cum Commissioner, Excise Department Government of Bihar, Patna.

2. The Secretary Cum Commissioner, Department of Excise, Government of Bihar, Patna.

3. Collector Cum District Magistrate, Madhepura.

4. Deputy Collector, Madhepura.

5. The Superintendent of Excise, Madhepura.

6. The Sub-Inspector of Excise, Madhepura.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Dinesh Prasad Verma, Adv For the Respondent/s : Mr.Vikash Kumar ( SC 11 ) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL JUDGMENT (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR )

Date : 12-05-2022 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

Petitioner has prayed for the following relief(s):-

"That this writ petition is being filed by the petitioner in the nature of certiorari to quash the order dt. 07.03.2022 passed by the Commissioner Excise, Bihar, Patna by which order dismissed the appeal no. 109/2022 filed by the petitioner. The above mentioned appeal was arises out from the order dated 06.01.2022 passed by the Deputy Collector Madhepura in the confiscation case No. 141/2021 (Excise), By which confiscated the Bolero vehicle vide registration no. BR 43A-1390."

Petitioner has approached this Court without availing the Patna High Court CWJC No.6207 of 2022 dt.12-05-2022

statutory remedy of revision against the impugned order, as

such, liberty is granted to petitioner to file revision against the

impugned order before the Revisional Authority and if any such

revision is filed within 4 weeks, then revisional authority shall

condone the delay in filing the revision as the matter remain

pending before this Court and shall decide the revision petition

on its own merit preferably within 8 weeks from the date of its

filing.

During pendency of revision, the confiscated

vehicle/property shall not be auction sold, if not already auction

sold.

OR

It is submitted by learned counsel for the State that

during pendency of writ petition, there has been amendment in

the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Rules, 2021 and a new Rule

12(B) and 57(B) have been inserted which reads as under:-

"12B. Release of Premises on Payment of Penalty: - (1) If any premises or part thereof has been seized or sealed by any police or excise officer under the Act, then in terms of section-57B (2) of the Act, the Collector or an officer authorized by him, upon receipt of an application in Form V from the owner of the said premises, may release or unseal the said premises or part thereof upon payment of such penalty as may be ordered by the Collector or the officer authorized by him. Provided, where it is not possible to ascertain the owner of the premises or the owner is not coming forward, the Collector or the officer authorized by him shall, after waiting for 15 days from the date of seizure/sealing, proceed to confiscate the premises as per the provisions of the Act.

(2) The Collector or the officer authorized by him shall have due regard to the economic status of the Patna High Court CWJC No.6207 of 2022 dt.12-05-2022

individual, nature of his involvement in the crime, location of the premises and the quantum of intoxicant recovered while deciding the quantum of fine to be paid by the individual. However, the fine shall not be less than Rs. one Lakh in any case. In any case, the Collector shall not wait beyond 15 days from the date of seizure/sealing and if during this period, the accused/owner does not pay up the penalty he shall proceed with the confiscation/auction.

(3) Notwithstanding above, if on a report by police officer or excise officer, the Collector or the officer authorized by him is satisfied that releasing the premises shall not be in the public interest, the Collector or the officer authorized by him shall proceed ahead with the confiscation of the said premises or part thereof and its subsequent auction/disposal.

(4) Such penalty shall be, regardless of the outcome of the trial if any, before the Special Court, non-refundable.

(5) The owner of the Premises shall, after the release of the premises, allow the inspection of the premises as and when desired by the authorities.

[Explanation: In all pending/ongoing cases of confiscation/ auction of premises, the Collector or the officer authorized by him may give an opportunity to the existing owner to pay the aforesaid penalty and get the premises released. Upon satisfaction of ownership and upon payment of such penalty, the ongoing confiscation/auction proceeding may be dropped and the premises released.]"

57B-Things or premises liable to be released upon penalty-

(1) Any animal, vehicle, vessel or other conveyance used for committing any offence punishable under this Act that has been seized by any police Officer or Excise Officer may be released by the Collector upon payment of such penalty as may be notified by the State Government.

(2) Any premises or part thereof used for committing any offence punishable under this Act that has been seized by any police Officer or Excise Officer may be released by the Collector upon payment of such penalty as may be notified by the State Government.

(3) If the person concerned does not pay the penalty, then the Collector shall proceed to confiscate the said animal, vehicle, vessel or other conveyance and premises as per section-58.

[Explanation 1: It shall not be a right of the accused to get his conveyance, item or premises released upon payment of the required penalty. The Collector, based upon a report by a police Officer or an Excise Officer, may, for reasons to be recorded in writing, still refuse to release the said conveyance, item or premises and proceed ahead with confiscation and auction/destruction.] [Explanation 2: The Collector shall, from the date of this Amendment coming into force, close the on- going confiscation proceeding if the person concerned pays the penalty as notified and release such vehicle, Patna High Court CWJC No.6207 of 2022 dt.12-05-2022

conveyance or premises.] [Explanation 3: Such release shall not affect the outcome of trial, if any, before the Special Court.]"

In view of amendment in the Excise Act, and same

being applicable in pending case, it shall be open for the

petitioner to get his/her vehicle released in terms of Rule 12(B)

and 57(B) inserted by amending Bihar Prohibition and Excise

Rules, 2021.

With aforesaid observation and direction, the writ

petition stands disposed of.

(Sanjay Karol, CJ)

(S. Kumar, J)

ranjan/-

AFR/NAFR                NAFR
CAV DATE                NA
Uploading Date
Transmission Date       NA
 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter