Monday, 18, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Yogendra Yadav vs The State Of Bihar
2022 Latest Caselaw 868 Patna

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 868 Patna
Judgement Date : 1 February, 2022

Patna High Court
Yogendra Yadav vs The State Of Bihar on 1 February, 2022
          IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                   Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.19529 of 2021
     ======================================================

Yogendra Yadav Son of Khakhanu Yadav Resident of Ward No. 5, Bettiah Raj Colony, Narainapur, P.O. Narainpur P.S. Patkhauli District- West Champaran.

... ... Petitioner/s Versus

1. The State of Bihar through the Secretary Food and Civil Supply Government of Bihar New Secretariat Patna.

2. The District Magistrate, West Champaran.

3. The Sub Divisional Magistrate, Bagaha, West Champaran.

4. The Block Supply Officer, Bagaha.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Sanjeev Kumar Mishra, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr.Lalit Kishore ( A.G. )

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL JUDGMENT (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR)

(The proceedings of the Court are being conducted through Video Conferencing and the Advocates joined the proceedings through Video Conferencing from their residence.)

Date : 01-02-2022

Heard learned counsel for the parties.

Petitioner has prayed for the following relief(s).

"1 That this writ petition is being filed with a prayer for issuance of an appropriate writ in the nature of certiorari quashing the order contained in memo no. 624 dated 27.07.2021 passed by the respondent Sub Divisional Officer by which the license no. 16/2007 of the petitioner under Public Distribution System has Patna High Court CWJC No.19529 of 2021 dt.01-02-2022

been cancelled in most arbitrary manner and the petitioner further prays to restore the license of the petitioner forthwith."

After the matter was heard for some time, learned

counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, under

instructions, states that petitioner may be permitted to prefer

an appeal against the impugned order before the Appellate

Authority.

Permission granted.

Learned counsel for the respondents states that if

such an appeal is preferred within a period of four weeks from

today, the issue of limitation, if any, shall neither be raised nor

allowed to come in the way of adjudication of the appeal on

merits.

Statement accepted and taken on record.

As such, petition stands disposed of in the following

mutually agreeable terms:-

(a) Petitioner is permitted to prefer an appeal within a

period of four weeks from today;

(b) In the event of appeal being preferred within a

period of four weeks from today, the issue of limitation shall

not come in the way of adjudication of the appeal on merits; Patna High Court CWJC No.19529 of 2021 dt.01-02-2022

(c) Opportunity shall be granted to the parties to

place on record all essential documents and materials, if so

required and desired;

(d) Petitioner through learned counsel undertakes to

fully cooperate and not take unnecessary adjournment;

(e) The Appellate Authority shall decide the appeal

on merits, in compliance of the principles of natural justice;

(f) The Appellate Authority shall pass a reasoned and

speaking order, within a period of eight weeks from the date

of filing of the appeal;

(g) Copy of the reasoned and speaking order passed

by the Appellate Authority shall be supplied to the parties;

(h) Equally, liberty reserved to the parties to take

recourse to such other remedies as are otherwise available in

accordance with law;

(i) We are hopeful that as and when petitioner takes

recourse to such remedies, as are otherwise available in law,

before the appropriate forum, the same shall be dealt with, in

accordance with law and with reasonable dispatch;

(j) We have not expressed any opinion on merits and

all issues are left open;

(k) Liberty reserved to the petitioner to challenge the Patna High Court CWJC No.19529 of 2021 dt.01-02-2022

order, before the appropriate forum, if required and desired.

The instant petition sands disposed of in the

aforesaid terms.

Interlocutory Application(s), if any, stands disposed of.

(Sanjay Karol, CJ)

( S. Kumar, J) Rajiv/veena-

AFR/NAFR CAV DATE Uploading Date Transmission Date

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter