Tuesday, 19, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Anil Kumar vs The State Of Bihar
2022 Latest Caselaw 1200 Patna

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 1200 Patna
Judgement Date : 17 February, 2022

Patna High Court
Anil Kumar vs The State Of Bihar on 17 February, 2022
         IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                    Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.9353 of 2021
     ======================================================

Anil Kumar S/o Kapileshwar Yadav R/o Village- Chhapra Dhih, P.O.- Kuardh, P.S.- Khajauli, Dist- Madhubani, present residing at Road No.-1, Quarter No.12, Kazipur, Near Dinkar Golambar, Patna, Bihar- 800004.

... ... Petitioner/s Versus

1. The State of Bihar through the Chief Secretary, Government of Bihar.

2. The Principal Secretary, General Administration Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

3. The Additional Secretary, General Administration Department, Government of Bihar.

4. The Principal Secretary, Finance Department, Government of Bihar.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Vishal Vikram Rana For the Respondent/s : Mr. Lalit Kishore (AG) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P. B. BAJANTHRI ORAL JUDGMENT Date : 17-02-2022

The matter has been heard via video conferencing

due to circumstances prevailing on account of the COVID-19

pandemic.

In the instant petition, petitioner has prayed for the

following relief/reliefs:

"i. To modify the notification issued in

Memo no.- 1506, 3919 and 14565

dated 30.01.2012, 14.03.2012 and

18.10.2012 respectively by which the

petitioner was posted on the post of

Assistant has been declared contrary

to the terms in the advertisement

dated 02.04.20111 by which the Patna High Court CWJC No.9353 of 2021 dt.17-02-2022

priorities to given to the candidates

having outstanding sports career and

prescribed educational qualification

in the District Offices whereas

similarly situated persons with lower

or similar outstanding have been

given posting in the offices notified

under Bihar Secretariat clerical cadre

service, whose pay scales are different

apart from that being additional

promotional avenues, which is not

notified for District cadre clerical

employed being violative of Article 14

of the Constitution of India.

ii. To direct the concerned respondents

to produce all connected records for

perusal of this Hon'ble Court.

iii. And for any other order/orders

which may appear fit and proper in

the facts of the present case."

The aforesaid relief relates back to the year 2012

whereas the present petition is presented in the year 2021, Patna High Court CWJC No.9353 of 2021 dt.17-02-2022

therefore, the present petition is liable to be rejected on the

ground of delay and laches. The Apex Court in the case of State

of Jammu and Kashmir Vs. R.K. Zalpuri and others reported

in AIR 2016 SC 3006, Paragraph-20, which is held as under:

"20. Having stated thus, it is useful to

refer to a passage from City and Industrial

Development Corporation Vs. Dosu

Aardeshir Bhiwandiwala and others {(2009)

1 SCC 168}, wherein this Court while

dwelling upon jurisdiction under Article 226

of the Constitution, has expressed thus:-

"The Court while exercising its

jurisdiction under Article 226 is duty-bound

to consider whether:

(a) Adjudication of writ petition

involves any complex and disputed question

of facts and whether they can be

satisfactorily resolved;

(b) The petition reveals all material

facts;

(c) The petitioner has any alternative

or effective remedy for the resolution of the Patna High Court CWJC No.9353 of 2021 dt.17-02-2022

dispute;

(d) Person invoking the jurisdiction is

guilty of unexplained delay and laches;

(e) Ex facie barred by any laws of

limitation;

(f) Grant of relief is against public

policy or barred by any valid law; and host

of other factors".

One of the principle laid down in the aforesaid

decision of the Apex Court is that before entertaining petition

under Article 226 of the Constitution of India by the Writ Court,

Writ Court has to examine delay and laches. Hence, the present

case is squarely covered by the aforesaid decision on the point

of delay and laches.

Accordingly, writ petition stands dismissed.

(P. B. Bajanthri, J) Ankit/-

AFR/NAFR                         NAFR
CAV DATE                          NA
Uploading Date                23.02.2022
Transmission Date                 NA
 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter