Wednesday, 20, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Arti Kumari vs The State Of Bihar
2022 Latest Caselaw 1107 Patna

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 1107 Patna
Judgement Date : 14 February, 2022

Patna High Court
Arti Kumari vs The State Of Bihar on 14 February, 2022
         IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                    Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.8198 of 2021
     ======================================================

Arti Kumari Wife of Arun Kumar Ray resident of Village - Bangari, Sirpal Basant, Police Station Garkha, District Saran at Chapra.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through Principal Secretary Social Welfare Department, New Secretariat.

2. The Commissioner, Saran at Chapra.

3. The District Magistrate, Saran at Chapra.

4. The District Program Officer, Saran at Chapra.

5. The Block Development Officer, Garkha Block, Saran at Chapra.

6. The Block Child Development Project Officer, Garkha, Block, Saran at Chapra.

7. The Supervisor, Garkha Block, Saran at Chapra.

8. Guria Kumari W/O Arun Ray resident of Village Bangari Sirpal Basant, Police Station Garkha, District Saran at Chapra.

9. The Ward Member, Bangari, Jalal Basant Garkha, Saran at Chapra.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Pramod Ban Bihari Singh For the Respondent/s : Mr. Gyan Prakash Ojha (GA-7) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P. B. BAJANTHRI ORAL JUDGMENT Date : 14-02-2022

The matter has been heard via video conferencing

due to circumstances prevailing on account of the COVID-19

pandemic.

Learned counsel for the State accepts notice for

respondent nos. 1 to 7 and 9.

Service of notice to respondent no. 8, Guriya Patna High Court CWJC No.8198 of 2021 dt.14-02-2022

Kumari, is dispensed since no adverse order is passed.

In the instant petition, petitioner has prayed for the

following relief/reliefs:

(I) For issuance of a writ in the

nature of certiorari or any other

appropriate writ for quashing the

selection letter dated 30.07.2019 of

respondent no. 8 on the post of Sevika

under Panchayat Raj Jalal Basant

Garkha, Saran, Bihar after calling the

selection letter of respondent no.8

which has not been issued by the

respondent no. 6 dated 30.10.2020

vide letter no. 358.

                                         (II) For issuance of any other

                                         writ/writs,                order/orders,

                                         direction/directions     which      your

Lordships may deem fit and proper in

the facts and circumstances of the

case.

The petitioner without exhausting statutory remedy

of appeal presented this petition and petition is not maintainable Patna High Court CWJC No.8198 of 2021 dt.14-02-2022

in view of the Apex Court decision in the case of State of

Jammu and Kashmir Vs. R.K. Zalpuri and others reported in

AIR 2016 SC 3006, Paragraph-20 which is held as under:

"20. Having stated thus, it is useful to

refer to a passage from City and Industrial

Development Corporation Vs. Dosu

Aardeshir Bhiwandiwala and others {(2009)

1 SCC 168}, wherein this Court while

dwelling upon jurisdiction under Article 226

of the Constitution, has expressed thus:-

"The Court while exercising its

jurisdiction under Article 226 is duty-bound

to consider whether:

(a) Adjudication of writ petition involves any

complex and disputed question of facts and

whether they can be satisfactorily resolved;

(b) The petition reveals all material facts;

(c) The petitioner has any alternative or

effective remedy for the resolution of the

dispute;

(d) Person invoking the jurisdiction is guilty

of unexplained delay and laches; Patna High Court CWJC No.8198 of 2021 dt.14-02-2022

(e) Ex facie barred by any laws of limitation;

(f) Grant of relief is against public policy or

barred by any valid law; and host of other

factors"

In view of the aforesaid decision, the present

petition is premature, therefore, the petitioner is at liberty to

prefer appeal before the Appellate Authority within a period of

eight weeks from the date of receipt of this order. If such appeal

is preferred by the petitioner, the same shall be considered after

giving ample opportunity of hearing to the petitioner as well as

respondent no.8, Guriya Kumari. Such exercise shall be

completed within a period of three months from the date of

receipt of appeal.

Accordingly, writ petition stands disposed of.

(P. B. Bajanthri, J) Ankit/-

AFR/NAFR                         NAFR
CAV DATE                          NA
Uploading Date                17.02.2022
Transmission Date                 NA
 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter