Tuesday, 19, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Phani Bhushan Prasad vs The State Of Bihar And Ors
2022 Latest Caselaw 4400 Patna

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 4400 Patna
Judgement Date : 10 August, 2022

Patna High Court
Phani Bhushan Prasad vs The State Of Bihar And Ors on 10 August, 2022
          IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                  Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.905 of 2018
                                         In
                   Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.11816 of 2014
     ======================================================

Phani Bhushan Prasad, Son of Late Babu Sadhu Saran Prasad, C/o Sri Nutan Prasad R/o Sector-D, House No.166, People Co-operative Colony, Lohiyanagar, Kankarbagh, P.S.- Kankarbagh, Distt. - Patna

... ... Petitioner Versus

1. The State of Bihar

2. Sri Amrit Lal Meena, The Principal Secretary, Road Construction Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna

3. Sri Laxmi Narayan Das, The Engineer-in-Chief-cum-Additional Commissioner cum special Secretary, Road Construction Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

4. Sri Ahmad Hussain, The Executive Engineer, National Highway Division, Gulzarbagh, Patna

5. Sri Suresh Kumar, The Accountant General, Bihar, Patna.

6. The State of Jharakhand through the Principal Secretary, Road Construction Department.

7. Sri Nagendra Nath Sinha, The Principal Secretary, Road Construction Department, Govt. of Jharkhand.

8. Sri Shiv Mangal Tiwary, The District Provident Fund Officer, Dumka, Jharkhand.

... ... Contemnors/Opposite Parties ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner : Mr. Prashant Kumar, Advocate Mr. Amit Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Parties : Mr. Amit Prakash, GA-13 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHWANI KUMAR SINGH ORAL JUDGMENT Date : 10-08-2022

The instant application under Article 215 of the

Constitution of India read with Sections 11 and 12 of the

Contempt of Court Act has been filed by the petitioner for

initiating a contempt proceeding against the opposite parties for

their wilfull and deliberate violation to the order dated Patna High Court MJC No.905 of 2018 dt.10-08-2022

19.04.2017 passed in C.W.J.C. No.11816 of 2014.

2. The operative part of the order dated 19.04.2017

passed in C.W.J.C. No.11816 of 2014 reads as under:-

"Regard being had to the facts and circumstances of the case, the writ application is disposed of with a direction to the petitioner to file a representation in detail regarding all his left over grievances before the respondent no.3 Engineer in Chief-cum-Additional Commissioner-cum-Special Secretary, Road Construction Department, Government of Bihar, Patna within a period of one month from today. In case of filing of such a representation, the respondent no.3 shall be required to examine his claims and pass a speaking order within a period of three months. If any of his claims is found to be admissible, the payment shall also be made to him within the aforementioned period of three months. In case of refusal of any his claims, the order passed by him should be communicated to him on his address by registered post.

With the aforesaid observations and directions, the writ application is disposed of."

3. A show cause has been filed on behalf of opposite

party nos. 2 and 3 wherein it has been stated in paragraph 5 that Patna High Court MJC No.905 of 2018 dt.10-08-2022

in order to ensure compliance of the order passed by this Court,

the opposite party no.3 has already passed a reasoned order vide

Memo No.2940 (E) dated 19.04.2018.

4. The aforesaid order dated 19.04.2018 has been

brought on record and marked as Annexure-A to the show cause

filed on behalf of the opposite party nos. 2 and 3.

5. In view of the above assertions made in the show

cause filed on behalf of the opposite party nos. 2 and 3, I am of

the considered opinion that no case of initiation of contempt

proceeding is made out.

6. In case, the petitioner is aggrieved by the reasoned

order passed by the opposite party no.3, he may challenge the

same by filing an appropriate application under Article 226 of

the Constitution of India.

7. With the aforesaid observation, the application for

initiation of contempt proceeding is dismissed.

(Ashwani Kumar Singh, J.)

Sanjeet/-

AFR/NAFR                NAFR
CAV DATE                NA
Uploading Date          12.08.2022
Transmission Date       NA
 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter