Tuesday, 19, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

M/S 4823 Birendra Bahadur Pal ... vs The Union Of India
2021 Latest Caselaw 5412 Patna

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 5412 Patna
Judgement Date : 23 November, 2021

Patna High Court
M/S 4823 Birendra Bahadur Pal ... vs The Union Of India on 23 November, 2021
          IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                     Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.7370 of 2020
     ======================================================

M/s 4823 Birendra Bahadur Pal Security Agency, Chandra Bhawan, 301-3rd Floor, Jagdeo Path, Post- BV College, Police Station- Airport, Patna, through its Proprietor Lt. Col. Birendra Bahadur Pal, Aged about 58 years, Gender- Male, Son of Pushkar Singh Pal, Resident of Sri Ram Puram, House No. 47 'B', Sri Ram Puram, Deval Chand Bandobasti, Rampur Road, Tehsil- Haldwani, District- Nainital, Uttarakhand- 263139.

... ... Petitioner/s Versus

1. The Union of India through the Secretary, Department of Ex- Servicemen Welfare, Ministry of Defence, Government of India, 5-A, South Block New Delhi- 110011.

2. The Secretary, Department of Ex- Servicemen Welfare, Ministry of Defence, Government of India, 5-A, South Block New Delhi- 110011.

3. The Deputy Secretary (Res-I) Department of Ex- Servicemen Welfare, Ministry of Defence, Government of India, 5-A, South Block New Delhi- 110011.

4. The Principal Director (Employment) Directorate General Resettlement, Ministry of Defence, Government of India, West Block IV, R K Puram, New Delhi.

5. The Joint Director,, Directorate Resettlement Zone, (Central), Ministry of Defence, Government of India, Central Command, Lucknow.

6. The State of Bihar through the Controlling Officer, Special Secretary (Intelligence), Special Branch, Police Headquarters, Patna (Bihar).

7. The Controlling Officer, Special Secretary (Intelligence), Special Branch, Police Headquarters, Patna (Bihar).

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Anand Kumar Ojha, Advocate Mr. Sanjeet Kumar, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Raj Kamal, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL JUDGMENT (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE)

Date : 23-11-2021 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

Petitioner has prayed for following reliefs:-

(1) for quashing of the disempanelment order dated 31.03.2020 issued under the signature of Joint Director, Directorate Resettlement Zone (Central), Ministry of Defence, Patna High Court CWJC No.7370 of 2020 dt.23-11-2021

Government of India, Central Command, Lucknow whereby and where under petitioner security agency has been disempanelled under the provisions of para 26 of Ministry of defence office memorandum for violation of paras 14(a) and 16 of MoD OM No. 28(3)/lD (Res-I) dated 09.07.2012 and it has further been directed to submit the DGR Empanelement Certificate in original to this Office at the earliest.

The aforesaid order has been passed without appreciating the facts and the relevant law involved in the matter like not giving show cause notice to some of the charges leveled against petitioner agency as well as the disempanellement has been ordered by the authority, inferior to the authority who empanelled him.

At this stage it would be more pertinent to mention here that order of the disempanellement has been passed, by the officer, who was transferred and was relieved on same day, i.e., on the date of his relieving he passed the order with an intention to harass the petitioner.

(2)Petitioner further prays for a direction upon the concerned respondent to restore the empanelment of the petitioner agency with DGR Security Agency scheme and for any other relief/reliefs, for which this Honble Court may find fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the present case.

Having heard learned counsel for the parties, we are

of the considered view that the order impugned herein dated 31 st

March, 2020 suffers from the vice of not assigning any reason,

sufficient enough for the authority to have formed its opinion,

disempanelling the petitioner for the purposes of providing

security in terms of Empanelment Certificate dated 17.01.2019

(Annexure P/2).

Patna High Court CWJC No.7370 of 2020 dt.23-11-2021

The impugned order dated 31st March, 2020, even

though runs into three pages, refers to certain office orders

alleged to have been violated in terms thereof, breached by the

petitioner but which part of the office order stands breached

cannot be deciphered from the impugned order passed whereby

the petitioner's certificate of empanelment stands cancelled

inasmuch as, the petitioner stands disempanelled.

Shri Ojha, learned counsel appearing for the

petitioner, argues that there is reference of certain alleged

malpractices or breach of the terms of the condition of

empanelment which have also been accounted for by the

authorities while passing the impugned order.

Well on this issue, we do not express any opinion

but on the first count, referred to earlier, we quash and set aside

the impugned order dated 31st March, 2020 (Annexure P/1),

whereby the petitioner stands disempanelled, with a direction

to the appropriate authority to pass a fresh order in accordance

with law after affording adequate opportunity of hearing to the

petitioner. We direct the petitioner to make himself available in

the office of respondent no.4, namely, the Principal Director

(Employment) Directorate General Resettlement, Ministry of

Defence, Government of India, West Block IV, R K Puram, New Patna High Court CWJC No.7370 of 2020 dt.23-11-2021

Delhi on 06.12.2021 and also place additional materials in

support of his contentions, refuting the charges indicated in the

show cause notice dated 21st December, 2019 (Annexure P/6).

We expect the appropriate authority to pass a reasoned order

assigning reasons within a period of 4 weeks thereafter.

Liberty reserved to the writ petitioner to take recourse

to such remedies as are otherwise available in accordance with

law.

However, it is made clear that this Court has not

expressed any opinion on the merits of the case and all issues of

facts and law are left open.

The writ petition stands disposed of.

Interlocutory application, if any, shall also stand

disposed of.




                                                 (Sanjay Karol, CJ)


                                                     ( S. Kumar, J)
Sanjay/- Ranjan
AFR/NAFR                NAFR
CAV DATE                NA
Uploading Date          25.11.2021
Transmission Date       NA
 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter