Tuesday, 19, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Satish Kumar Rai vs The State Of Bihar
2021 Latest Caselaw 5350 Patna

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 5350 Patna
Judgement Date : 22 November, 2021

Patna High Court
Satish Kumar Rai vs The State Of Bihar on 22 November, 2021
         IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.11029 of 2019
     ==============================================

1. Ajit Kumar Rai, Son of Bhola Rai, Resident of Rai Bhawan, South of Registry office, Marwari Muhalla, P.S.- Gopalganj, District- Gopalganj.

2. Manoj Kumar Prasad Son of Late Bhageshwar Prasad, Resident of Village- Dighwan, P.S.- Baikunthpur, District- Gopalganj.

3. Raja Ram Manjhi, Son of Late Harihar Manjhi, Resident of Rajendra Nagar, P.S.- Gopalganj, District- Gopalganj.

4. Shashi Kant Singh, Son of Late Shivdhari Singh, Resident of Village-

Imiliya, P.S.- Manjhagadh, District- Gopalganj.

5. Abhay Kumar Rai, Son of Kameshwar Rai, Resident of Mairwa Karn, P.S.- Manjhagadh, District- Gopalganj.

6. Praveen Kumar Singh, Son of Parmanand Singh Resident of Village-

Basaon, P.S.- Basantpur, District- Gopalganj.

7. Sanjay Kumar, Son of Late Jhamendra Prasad, Resident of Village-

Gambhari, P.S.- Baikunthpur, District- Gopalganj.

8. Dujeshanand Son of Shivnarayan Prasad, Resident of Village-

Bhitbherwa, P.S. and District- Gopalganj.

... ... Petitioner/s Versus

1. The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Education Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

2. The Principal Secretary, Education Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

3. The Director Primary Education, Government of Bihar, Patna.

4. The Regional Deputy Director of Education, Saran Division, Chapra, Bihar.

5. The District Magistrate, Gopalganj, Bihar.

6. The District Education Officer, Gopalganj, District- Gopalganj, Bihar.

7. The District Programe Officer (Establishment) Gopalganj, District-

Gopalganj, Bihar.

8. The Block Education Officer, Block- Bhore, District- Gopalganj, Bihar.

9. The Block Education Officer, Block- Vijayipur, District- Gopalganj, Bihar.

10. The Block Education Officer, Block- Phulwaria, District- Gopalganj, Bihar.

11. The Block Education Officer, Block- Kateya, District- Gopalganj, Bihar.

12. The Block Education Officer, Block- Kuchaikot, District- Gopalganj, Bihar.

Patna High Court CWJC No.11029 of 2019 dt.22-11-2021

13. Ajay Kumar Singh Son of Vishwanath Singh, aged about not known to the Petitioners, Resident of Village- Sareya, P.O. and P.S.- Bansghati, District- Deoria (U.P.)- Presently Posted at Rajkiya Madhya Vidyalaya, Bhore, District- Gopalganj.

... ... Respondent/s ============================================== with Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 10102 of 2019 ==============================================

1. Satish Kumar Rai Son of Late Vishwanath Prasad Rai Resident of Village- Koreya, P.S.- Bhore, District- Gopalganj, Bihar.

2. Vimala Kumari Wife of Brijbhushan Singh Resident of Village- Uttratola, P.S.- Bhore, District- Gopalganj, Bihar.

3. Shakuntala Gupta Wife of Vimal Kumar Jaiswal Resident of Village-

Bhore, P.S.- Bhore, District- Gopalganj, Bihar.

4. Umesh Ram Son of Rambriksh Ram Resident of Village- Parsahi, P.S.-

Bhore, District- Gopalganj.

5. Shambhu Nath Verma Son of Muktinath Resident of Village- Pagra, P.S.- Vijayipur, District- Gopalganj.

6. Sanjay Kumar Rai Son of Bhrigunath Rai Resident of Village- Geyaspur, P.S.- Guthani, District- Siwan.

7. Lalan Pandey Son of Late Godenath Pandey Resident of Bhingari Bazar, P.S.- Khampar, District- Deoria.

8. Shivnarayan Manjhi Son of Bahuravan Manjhi Resident of Basaha, P.S.-

Vijayipur, District- Gopalganj.

9. Samsuddin Ansari Son of Abdul Halim Resident of Village- Pakadi Tola, P.S.- Kateya, District- Gopalganj.

10. Yogendra Ram Son of Late Ramlal Ram Resident of Rakba, P.S.- Bhore, District- Gopalganj.

11. Ajay Kumar Pandey Son of Late Laxuman Pandey Resident of Village-

Khajuraha Mishir, P.S.- Bhore, District- Gopalganj.

12. Krishnakant Singh Son of Baburam Singh Resident of Village- Khadahi, P.S.- Bhore, District- Gopalganj.

13. Manoj Kumar Mishra Son of Dwarikanath Mishra Resident of Village-

Belaura, P.S.- Bhore, District- Gopalganj.

14. Abid Ali Ansari Son of Vadrudin Ansari Resident of Village- Semrauna, P.S.- Phulwariya, District- Gopalganj.

15. Arvind Kumar Rai Son of Shyamdeo Rai Resident of Village- Adarsh Nagar Singhriya, P.S.- Khorabar, District- Gorakhpur.

16. Janardan Thakur Son of Indrashan Thakur Resident of Shastri Nagar, P.S.- Kotwali, District- Deoria.

17. Brahmdeo Pandey Son of Chandrabhan Pandey Resident of Village- Patna High Court CWJC No.11029 of 2019 dt.22-11-2021

Bangra, P.S.- Vijayipur, District- Gopalganj.

18. Arun Kumar Singh Son of Ramchandra Singh Resident of Village- Dumar Narendra, P.S.- Bhore, District- Gopalganj.

19. Satish Kumar Singh Son of Ramchandra Singh Resident of Village-

Dumar Narendra, P.S.- Bhore, District- Gopalganj.

20. Shyam Bihari Prasad Son of Ramnaresh Prasad, Son of Ramchandra Singh Resident of Village- Basaha, P.S.- Vijayipur, District- Gopalganj.

21. Abdul Samad Son of Hamid Ansari Resident of Village- Tata Indicom, Alba Colony, P.S.- Phulwari, District- Patna.

22. Madan Mohan Singh Son of Baburam Singh Resident of Village- Khadhi, P.S.- Bhore, District- Gopalganj.

23. Omprakash Mishra Son of Late Dharmdeo Mishra Resident of Village-

Badahara, P.S.- Bhore, District- Gopalganj.

24. Anil Kumar Kushwaha Son of Ram Awadh Kushwaha Resident of Village-

Bhanpur, P.S.- Vijayipur, District- Gopalganj.

25. Dharmendra Nath Ranjan Son of Gangeshwar Yadav Resident of 223 Vikas Nagar Awas Colony, Lachchhipur, P.S.- Gorakhpur, District- Gorakhpur.

26. Binod Kumar Singh Son of Gyani Prasad Resident of Village- Hardiya, P.S.- Bhore, District- Gopalganj.

27. Makun Mahto Son of Bharat Mahto Resident of Gidha, P.S.- Phulwaria, District- Gopalganj.

28. Barister Sah Son of Late Rajbanshi Sah Resident of Village- Ramnagar, P.S.- Bhore, District- Gopalganj.

29. Narvdeshwar Ojha Son of Kailash Pati Ojha Resident of Village-

Ojhwaliya, P.S.- Phulwaria, District- Gopalganj.

30. Manoj Kumar Son of Krisna Bihari Prasad Resident of Village-

Bindwaliya, P.S.- Kuchaikot, District- Gopalganj.

... ... Petitioner/s Versus

1. The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Education Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

2. The Principal Secretary, Education Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

3. The Director Primary Education, Government of Bihar, Patna.

4. The Regional Deputy Director of Education, Saran Division, Chapra, Bihar.

5. The District Magistrate, Gopalganj, Bihar.

6. The District Education Officer, Gopalganj, District- Gopalganj, Bihar.

7. The District Programe Officer (Establishment) Gopalganj, District-

Gopalganj, Bihar.

Patna High Court CWJC No.11029 of 2019 dt.22-11-2021

8. The Block Education Officer, Block- Bhore, District- Gopalganj, Bihar.

9. The Block Education Officer, Block- Vijayipur, District- Gopalganj, Bihar.

10. The Block Education Officer, Block- Phulwaria, District- Gopalganj, Bihar.

11. The Block Education Officer, Block- Kateya, District- Gopalganj, Bihar.

12. The Block Education Officer, Block- Kuchaikot, District- Gopalganj, Bihar.

13. Ajay Kumar Singh Son of Vishwanath Singh Resident of Village- Sareya, P.O. and P.S.- Bansghati, District- Deoria (U.P.), Presently posted at Rajkiya Madhya Vidyalaya, Bhore, District- Gopalganj.

... ... Respondent/s ============================================== with Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 25036 of 2019 ==============================================

1. Sanjiv Shankar Prasad Son of Late Gauri Shankar Prasad Resident of Village- Purandarpur, P.S.- Goreyakothi, District- Siwan.

2. Shashi Kant Singh Son of Late Shivdhari Singh Resident of Village-

Hajiyapur Ward No. 10, P.S.- Gopalganj, District- Gopalganj.

3. Ramayan Prasad Yadav Son of Shivpujan Yadav Resident of Village-

Nautan, P.S.- Nautan, District- Siwan.

4. Ganesh Sah Son of Shivpujan Sah Resident of Village- Malikana Dhamapakad, P.S.- Manjha Garh, District- Gopalganj.

5. Vinod Kumar Singh Son of Ramadhar Singh Resident of Village-

Hasuwa, P.S.- Nautan, District- Siwan.

6. Deep Narayan Son Late Sinhashan Yadav Resident of Village- Ranipur, P.S.- Badhariya, District- Siwan.

... ... Petitioner/s Versus

1. The State of Bihar Through the Principal Secretary, Education Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

2. The Principal Secretary, Education Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

3. The Director Primary Education Government of Bihar, Patna.

4. The Regional Deputy Director of Education Saran Division, Chapra, Bihar.

5. The District Magistrate Gopalganj, Bihar.

6. The District Education Officer Gopalganj, District- Gopalganj, Bihar.

7. The District Programme Officer (Establishment) Gopalganj, District-

Gopalganj, Bihar.

8. The Block Education Officer Block- Bhore, District- Gopalganj, Bihar. Patna High Court CWJC No.11029 of 2019 dt.22-11-2021

9. The Block Education Officer Block- Vijayipur, District- Gopalganj, Bihar.

10. The Block Education Officer Block- Phulwaria, District- Gopalganj, Bihar.

11. The Block Education Officer Block- Kateya, District- Gopalganj, Bihar.

12. The Block Education Officer Block- Kuchaikot, District- Gopalganj, Bihar.

13. The Block Education Officer Block- Manjhagarh, District- Gopalganj, Bihar.

14. Ajay Kumar Singh Son of Vishwanath Singh Resident of Village- Sareya, P.O. and P.S.- Bansghati, District- Deoria, (U.P.)- Presently Posted at Rajkiya Madhya Vidyalaya, Bhore, District- Gopalganj.

... ... Respondent/s ============================================== Appearance :

(In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 11029 of 2019) For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Mrigank Mauli Mr.Prince Kumar Mishra, Adv.

For the Respondent/s : Mr. Kumar Kamal Narayan AC to SC 28 For the Respondent No. 13. : Mr. Akhilesh Kumar Sinha, Adv. (In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 10102 of 2019) For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Mrigank Mauli Mr.Prince Kumar Mishra For the Respondent/s : Mr. Sanjay Kumar, SC to GP -23 (In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 25036 of 2019) For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Mrigank Mauli : Mr.Prince Kumar Mishra For the Respondent/s : Mr.Subhash Chandra Mishra (Sc16) ============================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR ORAL JUDGMENT Date : 22-11-2021

1. Heard Mr. Mrigank Mauli, the learned senior

Advocate for the petitioners, Mr. Kumar Kamal Narayan,

learned counsel for the State and Mr. Akhilesh Kumar

Sinha for the respondent no. 13/ Ajay Kumar Singh.

2. The petitioners are graduate trained Middle

School Teachers whose promotion and appointment as

Headmaster in Elementary Schools have been cancelled by Patna High Court CWJC No.11029 of 2019 dt.22-11-2021

order dated 24.04.2019 passed by the Director, Primary

Education, Govt. of Bihar on the plea that in C.W.J.C. No.

9074 of 2018 (Ajay Kumar Singh vs. State of Bihar and

Others), a Bench of this Court had directed for cancellation

of all the promotions and transfers of such teachers who

were promoted to the rank of Headmasters and were

placed at different Elementary Schools where the posts of

Headmasters were lying vacant.

3. Mr. Mauli has submitted that the order passed

in C.W.J.C. No. 9074 of 2018 has been misconstrued by

the Director, Primary Education, Govt. of Bihar.

4. The facts leading to the filing of the present

petition are hereunder:-

5. A list of of eligible Graduate Trained Teachers

in the district of Gopalganj for the purposes of their being

promoted to the post of Headmaster was published in the

year 2017. The name of the petitioners fell in that list.

The list was prepared under the Bihar Elementary School

Teachers Training Rules of 2011 for promotion and posting

of Teachers.

6. On the recommendation of the District Primary Patna High Court CWJC No.11029 of 2019 dt.22-11-2021

Teachers Promotion Committee, which had held its

meeting on 22.12.2017, the petitioners and others were

promoted to the post of Headmaster of different schools in

the district of Gopalganj. Some of those transferees joined

on their respective posts and few of them, after joining,

registered their objections with respect to transfer as such

objections were invited by the respondents.

7. Some of the clerical mistakes which had crept

in the transfer orders were also rectified.

8. The respondent no. 13 in C.W.J.C. No.

11029/2019 (Ajay Kumar Singh), aggrieved by the

transfer of one Sanjay Kumar Rai, approached the

Regional Deputy Director of Education, who stayed the

transfer of aforesaid Sanjay Kumar Rai and six others.

However, later, on 27.04.2018 aforesaid Sanjay Kumar

Rai was directed to be given charge of Headmaster of

Middle School Bhore, Gopalganj. Ajay Kumar Singh, who

was working as an Assistant Teacher in Middle School

Bhore and was officiating as Headmaster was aggrieved

by the promotion of Sanjay Kumar Rai as the Headmaster

of the aforesaid school. As such, he challenged his Patna High Court CWJC No.11029 of 2019 dt.22-11-2021

(Sanjay Kumar Rai) promotion and transfer in the

aforesaid school as Headmaster, which was heard by a

Bench of this Court in C.W.J.C. No. 9074 of 2018. On the

basis of the submission made by aforesaid Ajay Kumar

Singh before this Court that Sanjay Kumar Rai had been

transferred in the aforesaid school on the recommendation

of the public functionaries and Officers of the Government,

the Bench set aside all previous orders with respect to

Ajay Kumar Singh and Sanjay Kumar Rai and the

respondents were directed to take a fresh decision with

respect to them in accordance with law within a period of

sixty days from the date of receipt / production of a copy

of that order. This Court had directed the respondents to

consider the case of the petitioner therein (Ajay Kumar

Singh) and the respondent Sanjay Kumar Rai objectively

while passing fresh order of posting.

9. Pursuant to the aforesaid order, the District

Programme Officer (Establishment), Gopalganj vide his

communication dated 15.06.2018 contained in Memo No.

1257 stayed all orders with respect to promotion and

transfer of Ajay Kumar singh and Sanjay Kumar Rai. As Patna High Court CWJC No.11029 of 2019 dt.22-11-2021

directed by this Court, the District Education Officer,

Gopalganj held an enquiry with respect to the transfer and

promotion of aforesaid Sanjay Kumar Rai on the

complaint of Ajay Kumar Singh and vide order dated

18.07.2018 /19.07.2018 came to the specific conclusion

that the claim of Ajay Kumar Singh was absolutely

unjustified. He could not have claimed for being promoted

and appointed as Headmaster as he was only matric

trained and had not obtained the grade of graduate trained

teacher. The enquiry report further clarified that the

school in which Sanjay Kumar Rai was posted as

Headmaster, was the school where Cluster Resource

Center was located and the school did not have a regular

Headmaster. Thus, it was the obligation of the respondents

to have placed a regular Headmaster in the aforesaid

school.

10. With the claim of the aforesaid Sanjay Kumar

Singh having been rejected in the enquiry, instead of

challenging the aforesaid report, he preferred a contempt

petition before this Court vide M.J.C. No. 1833 of 2018

which has been disposed on 13.01.2018 holding that no Patna High Court CWJC No.11029 of 2019 dt.22-11-2021

order passed by this Court is found to have been violated

and the directions given by this Court had been complied

with.

11. Adopting a novell procedure, aforesaid Ajay

Kumar Singh challenged the enquiry report before the

Director, Primary Education, Govt. of Bihar and submitted

before him that in view of the order passed by this Court

in C.W.J.C. No. 9074 of 2018, the entire promotion and

transfer list was required to be annulled.

12. The Director, Primary Education, Govt. of

Bihar appears to have read the following observation of

this Court in C.W.J.C. No. 9074 of 2018 referred to

above, namely, "In the aforesaid circumstances, the

respondents are required to cancel all the previous orders

with regard to petitioner and the respondents treating

them as null and void and they are required to take fresh

decision in accordance with law within a maximum period

of 60 days from the receipt/production of a copy of this

order. The respondents will consider the case of the

petitioner and respondents objectively while passing fresh

order of posting" as a direction to set aside the entire list Patna High Court CWJC No.11029 of 2019 dt.22-11-2021

of such teachers who were promoted and transferred to

the respective schools as Headmasters.

13. The learned counsel for the petitioners has,

thus, argued that the Director Primary Education has

passed a perverse order without understanding the import

of the order passed in C.W.J.C. No. 9074 of 2017 in which

the lis between the two of the aspirants for the post of

Headmaster in a Middle School at Bhore in the district of

Gopalganj was being scrutinized.

14. What this Court had directed in the aforesaid

writ petition was to hold an enquiry with respect to the

promotion and transfer of two of the aspirants who are

respondents in the present petition and decide the claim

inter se between the parties with respect to the post of

Headmaster in that particular school. The order was not in

rem.

15. The aforesaid order is sought to be justified by

the learned counsel for the State and the respondents on

the ground that the Director, Primary Education had an

overall responsibility to see that no irregularity is

committed in matters of promotion and transfer of Patna High Court CWJC No.11029 of 2019 dt.22-11-2021

Headmasters. Once it was admitted that in case of one of

the transferees, the recommendation of a public authority

or a high Officer of the Government was given weightage,

the entire list of such transferees stood contaminated and

a rectification measure had to be adopted.

16. This argument, to say the least, is not

acceptable at all.

17. The order passed by this Court in C.W.J.C. No.

9074 of 2018 is absolutely clear in its reach and ambit.

The enquiry conducted pursuant to the aforesaid order is

also clear in its finding. The claim of Ajay Kumar Singh

was rejected on the ground of his not having necessary

qualification for being promoted as Headmaster as he was

only matric trained at that time. That enquiry report could

not have been read as a report indicating mass scale

irregularities and transfers having been made on the

recommendation of public figures. Thus, for all practical

purposes, the Director Primary Education has assumed a

responsibility and has presumably acted as if on a

mandate by an order given by a Bench of this Court.

18. That being the basis of the order passed by the Patna High Court CWJC No.11029 of 2019 dt.22-11-2021

Director Primary Education dated 24.04.2019, it is not

sustainable in the eye of law.

19. Mr. Mauli has further informed this Court that

because of the stay granted by this Court vide order dated

30.09.2020, all such transferees are officiating as

Headmasters at their respective place of transfers.

20. The order passed by the Director, Primary

Education, Govt. of Bihar vide Memo no. 597 dated

24.04.2019, is thus quashed.

21. These writ applications are allowed.

(Ashutosh Kumar, J)

sunilkumar/-

AFR/NAFR              AFR
CAV DATE              N/A
Uploading Date        24.11.2021
Transmission Date     N/A
 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter