Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 5350 Patna
Judgement Date : 22 November, 2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.11029 of 2019
==============================================
1. Ajit Kumar Rai, Son of Bhola Rai, Resident of Rai Bhawan, South of Registry office, Marwari Muhalla, P.S.- Gopalganj, District- Gopalganj.
2. Manoj Kumar Prasad Son of Late Bhageshwar Prasad, Resident of Village- Dighwan, P.S.- Baikunthpur, District- Gopalganj.
3. Raja Ram Manjhi, Son of Late Harihar Manjhi, Resident of Rajendra Nagar, P.S.- Gopalganj, District- Gopalganj.
4. Shashi Kant Singh, Son of Late Shivdhari Singh, Resident of Village-
Imiliya, P.S.- Manjhagadh, District- Gopalganj.
5. Abhay Kumar Rai, Son of Kameshwar Rai, Resident of Mairwa Karn, P.S.- Manjhagadh, District- Gopalganj.
6. Praveen Kumar Singh, Son of Parmanand Singh Resident of Village-
Basaon, P.S.- Basantpur, District- Gopalganj.
7. Sanjay Kumar, Son of Late Jhamendra Prasad, Resident of Village-
Gambhari, P.S.- Baikunthpur, District- Gopalganj.
8. Dujeshanand Son of Shivnarayan Prasad, Resident of Village-
Bhitbherwa, P.S. and District- Gopalganj.
... ... Petitioner/s Versus
1. The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Education Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.
2. The Principal Secretary, Education Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.
3. The Director Primary Education, Government of Bihar, Patna.
4. The Regional Deputy Director of Education, Saran Division, Chapra, Bihar.
5. The District Magistrate, Gopalganj, Bihar.
6. The District Education Officer, Gopalganj, District- Gopalganj, Bihar.
7. The District Programe Officer (Establishment) Gopalganj, District-
Gopalganj, Bihar.
8. The Block Education Officer, Block- Bhore, District- Gopalganj, Bihar.
9. The Block Education Officer, Block- Vijayipur, District- Gopalganj, Bihar.
10. The Block Education Officer, Block- Phulwaria, District- Gopalganj, Bihar.
11. The Block Education Officer, Block- Kateya, District- Gopalganj, Bihar.
12. The Block Education Officer, Block- Kuchaikot, District- Gopalganj, Bihar.
Patna High Court CWJC No.11029 of 2019 dt.22-11-2021
13. Ajay Kumar Singh Son of Vishwanath Singh, aged about not known to the Petitioners, Resident of Village- Sareya, P.O. and P.S.- Bansghati, District- Deoria (U.P.)- Presently Posted at Rajkiya Madhya Vidyalaya, Bhore, District- Gopalganj.
... ... Respondent/s ============================================== with Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 10102 of 2019 ==============================================
1. Satish Kumar Rai Son of Late Vishwanath Prasad Rai Resident of Village- Koreya, P.S.- Bhore, District- Gopalganj, Bihar.
2. Vimala Kumari Wife of Brijbhushan Singh Resident of Village- Uttratola, P.S.- Bhore, District- Gopalganj, Bihar.
3. Shakuntala Gupta Wife of Vimal Kumar Jaiswal Resident of Village-
Bhore, P.S.- Bhore, District- Gopalganj, Bihar.
4. Umesh Ram Son of Rambriksh Ram Resident of Village- Parsahi, P.S.-
Bhore, District- Gopalganj.
5. Shambhu Nath Verma Son of Muktinath Resident of Village- Pagra, P.S.- Vijayipur, District- Gopalganj.
6. Sanjay Kumar Rai Son of Bhrigunath Rai Resident of Village- Geyaspur, P.S.- Guthani, District- Siwan.
7. Lalan Pandey Son of Late Godenath Pandey Resident of Bhingari Bazar, P.S.- Khampar, District- Deoria.
8. Shivnarayan Manjhi Son of Bahuravan Manjhi Resident of Basaha, P.S.-
Vijayipur, District- Gopalganj.
9. Samsuddin Ansari Son of Abdul Halim Resident of Village- Pakadi Tola, P.S.- Kateya, District- Gopalganj.
10. Yogendra Ram Son of Late Ramlal Ram Resident of Rakba, P.S.- Bhore, District- Gopalganj.
11. Ajay Kumar Pandey Son of Late Laxuman Pandey Resident of Village-
Khajuraha Mishir, P.S.- Bhore, District- Gopalganj.
12. Krishnakant Singh Son of Baburam Singh Resident of Village- Khadahi, P.S.- Bhore, District- Gopalganj.
13. Manoj Kumar Mishra Son of Dwarikanath Mishra Resident of Village-
Belaura, P.S.- Bhore, District- Gopalganj.
14. Abid Ali Ansari Son of Vadrudin Ansari Resident of Village- Semrauna, P.S.- Phulwariya, District- Gopalganj.
15. Arvind Kumar Rai Son of Shyamdeo Rai Resident of Village- Adarsh Nagar Singhriya, P.S.- Khorabar, District- Gorakhpur.
16. Janardan Thakur Son of Indrashan Thakur Resident of Shastri Nagar, P.S.- Kotwali, District- Deoria.
17. Brahmdeo Pandey Son of Chandrabhan Pandey Resident of Village- Patna High Court CWJC No.11029 of 2019 dt.22-11-2021
Bangra, P.S.- Vijayipur, District- Gopalganj.
18. Arun Kumar Singh Son of Ramchandra Singh Resident of Village- Dumar Narendra, P.S.- Bhore, District- Gopalganj.
19. Satish Kumar Singh Son of Ramchandra Singh Resident of Village-
Dumar Narendra, P.S.- Bhore, District- Gopalganj.
20. Shyam Bihari Prasad Son of Ramnaresh Prasad, Son of Ramchandra Singh Resident of Village- Basaha, P.S.- Vijayipur, District- Gopalganj.
21. Abdul Samad Son of Hamid Ansari Resident of Village- Tata Indicom, Alba Colony, P.S.- Phulwari, District- Patna.
22. Madan Mohan Singh Son of Baburam Singh Resident of Village- Khadhi, P.S.- Bhore, District- Gopalganj.
23. Omprakash Mishra Son of Late Dharmdeo Mishra Resident of Village-
Badahara, P.S.- Bhore, District- Gopalganj.
24. Anil Kumar Kushwaha Son of Ram Awadh Kushwaha Resident of Village-
Bhanpur, P.S.- Vijayipur, District- Gopalganj.
25. Dharmendra Nath Ranjan Son of Gangeshwar Yadav Resident of 223 Vikas Nagar Awas Colony, Lachchhipur, P.S.- Gorakhpur, District- Gorakhpur.
26. Binod Kumar Singh Son of Gyani Prasad Resident of Village- Hardiya, P.S.- Bhore, District- Gopalganj.
27. Makun Mahto Son of Bharat Mahto Resident of Gidha, P.S.- Phulwaria, District- Gopalganj.
28. Barister Sah Son of Late Rajbanshi Sah Resident of Village- Ramnagar, P.S.- Bhore, District- Gopalganj.
29. Narvdeshwar Ojha Son of Kailash Pati Ojha Resident of Village-
Ojhwaliya, P.S.- Phulwaria, District- Gopalganj.
30. Manoj Kumar Son of Krisna Bihari Prasad Resident of Village-
Bindwaliya, P.S.- Kuchaikot, District- Gopalganj.
... ... Petitioner/s Versus
1. The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Education Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.
2. The Principal Secretary, Education Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.
3. The Director Primary Education, Government of Bihar, Patna.
4. The Regional Deputy Director of Education, Saran Division, Chapra, Bihar.
5. The District Magistrate, Gopalganj, Bihar.
6. The District Education Officer, Gopalganj, District- Gopalganj, Bihar.
7. The District Programe Officer (Establishment) Gopalganj, District-
Gopalganj, Bihar.
Patna High Court CWJC No.11029 of 2019 dt.22-11-2021
8. The Block Education Officer, Block- Bhore, District- Gopalganj, Bihar.
9. The Block Education Officer, Block- Vijayipur, District- Gopalganj, Bihar.
10. The Block Education Officer, Block- Phulwaria, District- Gopalganj, Bihar.
11. The Block Education Officer, Block- Kateya, District- Gopalganj, Bihar.
12. The Block Education Officer, Block- Kuchaikot, District- Gopalganj, Bihar.
13. Ajay Kumar Singh Son of Vishwanath Singh Resident of Village- Sareya, P.O. and P.S.- Bansghati, District- Deoria (U.P.), Presently posted at Rajkiya Madhya Vidyalaya, Bhore, District- Gopalganj.
... ... Respondent/s ============================================== with Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 25036 of 2019 ==============================================
1. Sanjiv Shankar Prasad Son of Late Gauri Shankar Prasad Resident of Village- Purandarpur, P.S.- Goreyakothi, District- Siwan.
2. Shashi Kant Singh Son of Late Shivdhari Singh Resident of Village-
Hajiyapur Ward No. 10, P.S.- Gopalganj, District- Gopalganj.
3. Ramayan Prasad Yadav Son of Shivpujan Yadav Resident of Village-
Nautan, P.S.- Nautan, District- Siwan.
4. Ganesh Sah Son of Shivpujan Sah Resident of Village- Malikana Dhamapakad, P.S.- Manjha Garh, District- Gopalganj.
5. Vinod Kumar Singh Son of Ramadhar Singh Resident of Village-
Hasuwa, P.S.- Nautan, District- Siwan.
6. Deep Narayan Son Late Sinhashan Yadav Resident of Village- Ranipur, P.S.- Badhariya, District- Siwan.
... ... Petitioner/s Versus
1. The State of Bihar Through the Principal Secretary, Education Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.
2. The Principal Secretary, Education Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.
3. The Director Primary Education Government of Bihar, Patna.
4. The Regional Deputy Director of Education Saran Division, Chapra, Bihar.
5. The District Magistrate Gopalganj, Bihar.
6. The District Education Officer Gopalganj, District- Gopalganj, Bihar.
7. The District Programme Officer (Establishment) Gopalganj, District-
Gopalganj, Bihar.
8. The Block Education Officer Block- Bhore, District- Gopalganj, Bihar. Patna High Court CWJC No.11029 of 2019 dt.22-11-2021
9. The Block Education Officer Block- Vijayipur, District- Gopalganj, Bihar.
10. The Block Education Officer Block- Phulwaria, District- Gopalganj, Bihar.
11. The Block Education Officer Block- Kateya, District- Gopalganj, Bihar.
12. The Block Education Officer Block- Kuchaikot, District- Gopalganj, Bihar.
13. The Block Education Officer Block- Manjhagarh, District- Gopalganj, Bihar.
14. Ajay Kumar Singh Son of Vishwanath Singh Resident of Village- Sareya, P.O. and P.S.- Bansghati, District- Deoria, (U.P.)- Presently Posted at Rajkiya Madhya Vidyalaya, Bhore, District- Gopalganj.
... ... Respondent/s ============================================== Appearance :
(In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 11029 of 2019) For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Mrigank Mauli Mr.Prince Kumar Mishra, Adv.
For the Respondent/s : Mr. Kumar Kamal Narayan AC to SC 28 For the Respondent No. 13. : Mr. Akhilesh Kumar Sinha, Adv. (In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 10102 of 2019) For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Mrigank Mauli Mr.Prince Kumar Mishra For the Respondent/s : Mr. Sanjay Kumar, SC to GP -23 (In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 25036 of 2019) For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Mrigank Mauli : Mr.Prince Kumar Mishra For the Respondent/s : Mr.Subhash Chandra Mishra (Sc16) ============================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR ORAL JUDGMENT Date : 22-11-2021
1. Heard Mr. Mrigank Mauli, the learned senior
Advocate for the petitioners, Mr. Kumar Kamal Narayan,
learned counsel for the State and Mr. Akhilesh Kumar
Sinha for the respondent no. 13/ Ajay Kumar Singh.
2. The petitioners are graduate trained Middle
School Teachers whose promotion and appointment as
Headmaster in Elementary Schools have been cancelled by Patna High Court CWJC No.11029 of 2019 dt.22-11-2021
order dated 24.04.2019 passed by the Director, Primary
Education, Govt. of Bihar on the plea that in C.W.J.C. No.
9074 of 2018 (Ajay Kumar Singh vs. State of Bihar and
Others), a Bench of this Court had directed for cancellation
of all the promotions and transfers of such teachers who
were promoted to the rank of Headmasters and were
placed at different Elementary Schools where the posts of
Headmasters were lying vacant.
3. Mr. Mauli has submitted that the order passed
in C.W.J.C. No. 9074 of 2018 has been misconstrued by
the Director, Primary Education, Govt. of Bihar.
4. The facts leading to the filing of the present
petition are hereunder:-
5. A list of of eligible Graduate Trained Teachers
in the district of Gopalganj for the purposes of their being
promoted to the post of Headmaster was published in the
year 2017. The name of the petitioners fell in that list.
The list was prepared under the Bihar Elementary School
Teachers Training Rules of 2011 for promotion and posting
of Teachers.
6. On the recommendation of the District Primary Patna High Court CWJC No.11029 of 2019 dt.22-11-2021
Teachers Promotion Committee, which had held its
meeting on 22.12.2017, the petitioners and others were
promoted to the post of Headmaster of different schools in
the district of Gopalganj. Some of those transferees joined
on their respective posts and few of them, after joining,
registered their objections with respect to transfer as such
objections were invited by the respondents.
7. Some of the clerical mistakes which had crept
in the transfer orders were also rectified.
8. The respondent no. 13 in C.W.J.C. No.
11029/2019 (Ajay Kumar Singh), aggrieved by the
transfer of one Sanjay Kumar Rai, approached the
Regional Deputy Director of Education, who stayed the
transfer of aforesaid Sanjay Kumar Rai and six others.
However, later, on 27.04.2018 aforesaid Sanjay Kumar
Rai was directed to be given charge of Headmaster of
Middle School Bhore, Gopalganj. Ajay Kumar Singh, who
was working as an Assistant Teacher in Middle School
Bhore and was officiating as Headmaster was aggrieved
by the promotion of Sanjay Kumar Rai as the Headmaster
of the aforesaid school. As such, he challenged his Patna High Court CWJC No.11029 of 2019 dt.22-11-2021
(Sanjay Kumar Rai) promotion and transfer in the
aforesaid school as Headmaster, which was heard by a
Bench of this Court in C.W.J.C. No. 9074 of 2018. On the
basis of the submission made by aforesaid Ajay Kumar
Singh before this Court that Sanjay Kumar Rai had been
transferred in the aforesaid school on the recommendation
of the public functionaries and Officers of the Government,
the Bench set aside all previous orders with respect to
Ajay Kumar Singh and Sanjay Kumar Rai and the
respondents were directed to take a fresh decision with
respect to them in accordance with law within a period of
sixty days from the date of receipt / production of a copy
of that order. This Court had directed the respondents to
consider the case of the petitioner therein (Ajay Kumar
Singh) and the respondent Sanjay Kumar Rai objectively
while passing fresh order of posting.
9. Pursuant to the aforesaid order, the District
Programme Officer (Establishment), Gopalganj vide his
communication dated 15.06.2018 contained in Memo No.
1257 stayed all orders with respect to promotion and
transfer of Ajay Kumar singh and Sanjay Kumar Rai. As Patna High Court CWJC No.11029 of 2019 dt.22-11-2021
directed by this Court, the District Education Officer,
Gopalganj held an enquiry with respect to the transfer and
promotion of aforesaid Sanjay Kumar Rai on the
complaint of Ajay Kumar Singh and vide order dated
18.07.2018 /19.07.2018 came to the specific conclusion
that the claim of Ajay Kumar Singh was absolutely
unjustified. He could not have claimed for being promoted
and appointed as Headmaster as he was only matric
trained and had not obtained the grade of graduate trained
teacher. The enquiry report further clarified that the
school in which Sanjay Kumar Rai was posted as
Headmaster, was the school where Cluster Resource
Center was located and the school did not have a regular
Headmaster. Thus, it was the obligation of the respondents
to have placed a regular Headmaster in the aforesaid
school.
10. With the claim of the aforesaid Sanjay Kumar
Singh having been rejected in the enquiry, instead of
challenging the aforesaid report, he preferred a contempt
petition before this Court vide M.J.C. No. 1833 of 2018
which has been disposed on 13.01.2018 holding that no Patna High Court CWJC No.11029 of 2019 dt.22-11-2021
order passed by this Court is found to have been violated
and the directions given by this Court had been complied
with.
11. Adopting a novell procedure, aforesaid Ajay
Kumar Singh challenged the enquiry report before the
Director, Primary Education, Govt. of Bihar and submitted
before him that in view of the order passed by this Court
in C.W.J.C. No. 9074 of 2018, the entire promotion and
transfer list was required to be annulled.
12. The Director, Primary Education, Govt. of
Bihar appears to have read the following observation of
this Court in C.W.J.C. No. 9074 of 2018 referred to
above, namely, "In the aforesaid circumstances, the
respondents are required to cancel all the previous orders
with regard to petitioner and the respondents treating
them as null and void and they are required to take fresh
decision in accordance with law within a maximum period
of 60 days from the receipt/production of a copy of this
order. The respondents will consider the case of the
petitioner and respondents objectively while passing fresh
order of posting" as a direction to set aside the entire list Patna High Court CWJC No.11029 of 2019 dt.22-11-2021
of such teachers who were promoted and transferred to
the respective schools as Headmasters.
13. The learned counsel for the petitioners has,
thus, argued that the Director Primary Education has
passed a perverse order without understanding the import
of the order passed in C.W.J.C. No. 9074 of 2017 in which
the lis between the two of the aspirants for the post of
Headmaster in a Middle School at Bhore in the district of
Gopalganj was being scrutinized.
14. What this Court had directed in the aforesaid
writ petition was to hold an enquiry with respect to the
promotion and transfer of two of the aspirants who are
respondents in the present petition and decide the claim
inter se between the parties with respect to the post of
Headmaster in that particular school. The order was not in
rem.
15. The aforesaid order is sought to be justified by
the learned counsel for the State and the respondents on
the ground that the Director, Primary Education had an
overall responsibility to see that no irregularity is
committed in matters of promotion and transfer of Patna High Court CWJC No.11029 of 2019 dt.22-11-2021
Headmasters. Once it was admitted that in case of one of
the transferees, the recommendation of a public authority
or a high Officer of the Government was given weightage,
the entire list of such transferees stood contaminated and
a rectification measure had to be adopted.
16. This argument, to say the least, is not
acceptable at all.
17. The order passed by this Court in C.W.J.C. No.
9074 of 2018 is absolutely clear in its reach and ambit.
The enquiry conducted pursuant to the aforesaid order is
also clear in its finding. The claim of Ajay Kumar Singh
was rejected on the ground of his not having necessary
qualification for being promoted as Headmaster as he was
only matric trained at that time. That enquiry report could
not have been read as a report indicating mass scale
irregularities and transfers having been made on the
recommendation of public figures. Thus, for all practical
purposes, the Director Primary Education has assumed a
responsibility and has presumably acted as if on a
mandate by an order given by a Bench of this Court.
18. That being the basis of the order passed by the Patna High Court CWJC No.11029 of 2019 dt.22-11-2021
Director Primary Education dated 24.04.2019, it is not
sustainable in the eye of law.
19. Mr. Mauli has further informed this Court that
because of the stay granted by this Court vide order dated
30.09.2020, all such transferees are officiating as
Headmasters at their respective place of transfers.
20. The order passed by the Director, Primary
Education, Govt. of Bihar vide Memo no. 597 dated
24.04.2019, is thus quashed.
21. These writ applications are allowed.
(Ashutosh Kumar, J)
sunilkumar/-
AFR/NAFR AFR CAV DATE N/A Uploading Date 24.11.2021 Transmission Date N/A
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!