Tuesday, 19, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Dhananjay Kumar vs The State Of Bihar Through The ...
2021 Latest Caselaw 2353 Patna

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 2353 Patna
Judgement Date : 10 June, 2021

Patna High Court
Dhananjay Kumar vs The State Of Bihar Through The ... on 10 June, 2021
         IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                 Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.7262 of 2021
     ======================================================

Dhananjay Kumar, Son of Sri Ram Kumar Gupta, resident of Ward No. 10, Subhash Chowk, Nirmali, P.S. Nirmali, District Supaul, Bihar.

... ... Petitioner/s Versus

1. The State of Bihar through the Additional Chief Secretary, Department of Home, Government of Bihar, Patna.

2. The Excise Commissioner, Government of Bihar, Patna.

3. The District Magistrate cum Confiscating Authority, District Darbhanga, Bihar.

4. The Senior Superintendent of Police, District Darbhanga, Bihar.

5. The Officer in Charge cum Investigating Officer, P.S. Manigachhi, District Darbhanga, Bihar.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Prabhat Ranjan, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Vivek Prasad, G.P. 7 ====================================================== (The proceedings of the Court are being conducted through Video Conferencing and the Advocates joined the proceedings through Video Conferencing from their residence.) CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL JUDGMENT (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR)

Date : 10-06-2021

Heard the parties.

Petitioner has prayed for following relief(s):-

"(i) Quashing of the show cause notice to show cause dated 04.02.2020 (Annexure-3) in connection with Confiscation Case No. 29 of 2020 whereby the petitioner has been asked to show cause as to why on account of institution of the First Information Report, the vehicle of the petitioner is not confiscated.

(ii) Quashing of the Adjudication order dated 04.03.2020 (Annexure-3) passed by the Collector-

cum District Magistrate, Darbhanga in Excise Confiscation Case No. 29/2020 (State of Bihar through Senior Superintendent of Police Vs. Patna High Court CWJC No.7262 of 2021 dt.10-06-2021

Dhananjay Kumar) whereby, the vehicle of the petitioner bearing Registration No. BR-11AC-7168 has been confiscated under Section 58(2) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016;

(iii) Stay of the operation of the impugned order of confiscation dated 04.03.2020 during the pendency of the writ application and for restoration of the vehicle in favour of the petitioner provisionally; and/or

(iv) Restraining the respondents from creating in 3rd party right during the pendency of the present writ petition."

A preliminary objection is raised by learned

counsel for the State that petitioner has approached this Court

without exhausting the statutory remedy of appeal/revision

against the impugned order.

However it is submitted by learned counsel for the

petitioner that Confiscating Authority has passed the order in

flagrant violation of the principles of natural justice as well as

de hors of procedural Rules and has not considered the defence

of petitioner as given in his reply to show cause, as such the

present writ petition is maintainable although petitioner has not

availed the statutory remedy of appeal/revision provided under

the Act.

After hearing both the parties, this Court is of the

view that petitioner should exhaust his statutory remedy of

appeal/revision against the impugned order before approaching

this Court in its writ jurisdiction.

Patna High Court CWJC No.7262 of 2021 dt.10-06-2021

The writ petition is disposed of with liberty to

petitioner to avail the remedy of appeal against order passed by

the District Collector-cum-Confiscating Authority, Darbhanga,

before the Appellate Authority, and if any, such appeal is filed

within four weeks, the Appellate Authority shall condone the

delay in filing appeal as the matter remain pending before this

Court and shall decide the appeal on its own merit preferably

within eight weeks from the date of its filing.

During pendency of appeal, the confiscated

vehicle shall not be auction sold, if not already auction sold.

With aforesaid liberty, the writ petition is

disposed of.

(Sanjay Karol, CJ)

( S. Kumar, J) Rajiv/veena-

AFR/NAFR                NAFR
CAV DATE                NA
Uploading Date          11.06.2021
Transmission Date       NA
 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter