Wednesday, 20, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Suresh Prasad Sah vs The Union Of India
2021 Latest Caselaw 3794 Patna

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 3794 Patna
Judgement Date : 29 July, 2021

Patna High Court
Suresh Prasad Sah vs The Union Of India on 29 July, 2021
          IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                    Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.9362 of 2021
     ======================================================

Suresh Prasad Sah son of Shyam Lal Sah resident of Village- Phulhara Bazar, P.O.- Bidupur, P.S.- Raja Pakar, District- Vaishali at Hajipur- 844502.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The Union of India Department of Income Tax through the Commissioner of Income Tax, Revenue Building, Birchandra Patel Path, Patna (Bihar).

2. The Commissioner of Income Tax, Revenue Building, Birchandra Patel Path, Patna (Bihar).

3. The Income Tax Officer, Ward Circle- 1(3) Vaishali, Dighi Kalan, Vaishali at Hajipur (Bihar)- 844101.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Nitesh Kumar, Advocate Mr. Lakshmi Kant Tiwary, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr.Dr.K.N.Singh (ASG) Mrs. Archana Sinha, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL JUDGMENT (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE)

(The proceedings of the Court are being conducted by Hon'ble the Chief Justice/Hon'ble Judges through Video Conferencing from their residential offices/residences. Also the Advocates and the Staffs joined the proceedings through Video Conferencing from their residences/offices.)

Date : 29-07-2021

Petitioner has prayed for the following relief(s):

"For issuance of:

(i) MANDAMUS for direction of respondent no-3 to treat the petitioner as not being in default in respect of the amount in dispute in the appeal which is sub-judice in the appellate court against the assessment order under section 144 Patna High Court CWJC No.9362 of 2021 dt.29-07-2021

of the Income tax Act 1961 dated 05.12.2019 (Annexure-- 1) has passed by him and by which he has assessed the income of the petitioner for Assessment Year 2016-2017 amounting to Rs. 12,70,100.00 (Twelve Lakh Seventy Thousand One Hundred Rupees) as unexplained money under section 69A of the Income Tax Act 1961 and raised huge demand of Rs. 15,89,434.00 (Fifteen Lakhs Eighty Nine Thousand Four Hundred Thirty Four Rupees) and recovered from the bank account of the petitioner amounting to Rs. 79,404.00 (Seventy Nine Thousand Four Hundred Four Rupees) against the aforesaid demand. Hence the rest amount should be stayed till disposal of the appeal;

(ii) Granting any other relief/relieves to which the petitioner may be found entitled to."

It is brought to our notice that vide impugned order

dated 5th of December, 2019 passed by the Respondent No. 3

namely the Income Tax Officer, Ward Circle- 9(3) Vaishali the

income of the petitioner has been assessed for Assessment Year

2016-2017 amounting to Rs.12,70,100.00 and a demand of

Rs.15,89,434.00 has been raised and an amount of Rs.79,404.00 has

been recovered against the aforesaid demand.

Learned counsel for the Income Tax, states that he has

no objection if the matter is remanded to the Appellate Authority

for deciding the case afresh. Also, the case shall be decided on Patna High Court CWJC No.9362 of 2021 dt.29-07-2021

merits. Also, during pendency of the case, no coercive steps shall be

taken against the petitioner.

Statement accepted and taken on record.

However, having heard learned counsel for the parties

as also perused the record made available, we are of the

considered view that this Court, notwithstanding the statutory

remedy, is not precluded from interfering where, ex facie, we

form an opinion that the order is bad in law. This we say so,

for two reasons- (a) violation of principles of natural justice,

i.e. Fair opportunity of hearing. No sufficient time was

afforded to the petitioner to represent his case; (b) order passed

ex parte in nature, does not assign any sufficient reasons even

decipherable from the record, as to how the officer could

determine the amount due and payable by the assessee. The

order, ex parte in nature, passed in violation of the principles

of natural justice, entails civil consequences. As such, on this

short ground alone, we dispose of the present writ petition in

the following mutually agreeable terms:

(a) We quash and set aside the impugned order dated

5th of December, 2019 passed by the Respondent No. 3 namely

the Income Tax Officer, Ward Circle- 9(3) Vaishali;

(b) We accept the statement of the petitioner that ten Patna High Court CWJC No.9362 of 2021 dt.29-07-2021

per cent of the total amount, being condition prerequisite for

hearing of the appeal, already stands deposited. If that were so,

well and good. However, if the amount is not deposited for

whatever reason(s), same shall be done before the next date;

(c) Petitioner undertakes to deposit additional sum

of Rs. 1,00,000/- (one lac) with the Appellate Authority.

The petitioner undertakes to deposit the amount within one

week from today whereafter the appeal shall be decided

within two months.

(d) With such deposit, we direct the Appellate

Authority i.e. Commissioner, Appeal, Income Tax, to

decide the petitioner's appeal on merits. While passing such

order, we have taken notice of both the Circlular issued by

the Department as also the order passed by Hon'ble

Supreme Court in Civil Appeal No.6850 of 2018, titled as

Principal Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. L.G.

Electronics of India Pvt. Ltd. clarifying the same.

(e) This deposit shall be without prejudice to the

respective rights and contention of the parties and subject to

the order passed by the Appellate Authority. However, if it

is ultimately found that the petitioner's deposit is in excess,

the same shall be refunded within two months from the date Patna High Court CWJC No.9362 of 2021 dt.29-07-2021

of passing of the order;

(f) We also direct for de-freezing/de-attaching of

the bank account(s) of the writ-petitioner, if attached in

reference to the proceedings, subject matter of present

petition. This shall be done immediately.

(g) Petitioner undertakes to appear before the

Appellate Authority on 9th of August, 2021 at 10:30 A.M.,

if possible through digital mode;

(h) The Appellate Authority shall condone the

delay in filing the appeal and decide the appeal on

merits after complying with the principles of natural

justice;

(i) Opportunity of hearing shall be afforded to

the parties to place on record all essential documents

and materials, if so required and desired;

(j) During pendency of the appeal, no coercive

steps shall be taken against the petitioner.

(k) The Appellate Authority shall pass a fresh

order only after affording adequate opportunity to all

concerned, including the writ petitioner;

(l) Petitioner through learned counsel undertakes to Patna High Court CWJC No.9362 of 2021 dt.29-07-2021

fully cooperate in such proceedings and not take

unnecessary adjournment;

(m) The Appellate Authority shall decide the appeal

on merits expeditiously, preferably within a period of two

months from the date of appearance of the petitioner;

(n) Liberty reserved to the petitioner to challenge

the order, if required and desired;

(o) Equally, liberty reserved to the parties to take

recourse to such other remedies as are otherwise available

in accordance with law;

(p) We are hopeful that as and when petitioner

takes recourse to such remedies, before the appropriate

forum, the same shall be dealt with, in accordance with

law, with a reasonable dispatch;

(q) We have not expressed any opinion on merits

and all issues are left open;

(r) If possible, proceedings during the time of

current Pandemic [Covid-19] be conducted through

digital mode;

The instant petition sands disposed of in the

aforesaid terms.

Interlocutory Application(s), if any, also stands Patna High Court CWJC No.9362 of 2021 dt.29-07-2021

disposed of.

Learned counsel for the respondents undertakes to

communicate the order to the appropriate authority

through electronic mode.

(Sanjay Karol, CJ)

( S. Kumar, J)

K.C.Jha/-

AFR/NAFR
CAV DATE
Uploading Date          04.08.2021
Transmission Date
 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter