Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 10674 Ori
Judgement Date : 29 November, 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.(C) No.33539 of 2025
(An application under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, 1950)
Gitanjali Jena .... Petitioner
-versus-
State of Odisha and Others .... Opposite Parties
Appeared in this case by Hybrid Arrangement
(Virtual/Physical Mode):
For Petitioner - Mr. R.N. Behera,
Advocate.
For Opposite Parties - Mr. Tej Kumar,
Standing Counsel
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.C.BEHERA
Date of Hearing and Judgment :29.11.2025
A.C. Behera, J. This writ petition under Articles 226 & 227 of the
Constitution of India, 1950 has been filed by the petitioner challenging
the impugned order dated 11.10.2025 (Annexure-2) passed in Mutation
Case No.19135 of 2025 by the Addl. Tahasildar, Bhubaneswar (O.P.
No.4) on the ground of non-providing of opportunity of being heard to
the petitioner.
2. Heard from the learned counsel for the petitioner and learned ASC
for the State.
3. The case of the petitioner is that, she (petitioner) filed this writ
petition praying for quashing the impugned order dated 11.10.2025
(Annexure-2) passed in Mutation Case No.19135 of 2025 by the Addl.
Tahasildar, Bhubaneswar (O.P. No.4) on the ground that, the said order
has been passed without giving any opportunity of hearing to her
(petitioner).
The impugned order vide Annexure-2 passed by the Addl.
Tahasildar, Bhubaneswar (O.P. No.4) does not reveal about the providing
of any opportunity of hearing to the petitioner for passing of such
impugned order vide Annexure-2.
4. When, the impugned order vide Annexure-2 does not reveal about
the providing of any opportunity of hearing to the petitioner, then at this
juncture, it is held that, the impugned order has been passed by the O.P.
No.4 violating the principles of natural justice. For which, the impugned
order vide Annexure-2 cannot be sustainable under law.
Therefore, the impugned order dated 11.10.2025 (Annexure-2)
passed in Mutation Case No.19135 of 2025 by the Addl. Tahasildar,
Bhubaneswar (O.P. No.4) is liable to be quashed.
For which, it is held that, there is merit in the writ petition filed by
the petitioner. The same is to be allowed.
5. In result, the writ petition filed by the petitioner is allowed.
The impugned order dated 11.10.2025 (Annexure-2) passed in
Mutation Case No.19135 of 2025 by the Addl. Tahasildar, Bhubaneswar
(O.P. No.4) is quashed (set aside).
The matter vide Mutation Case No.19135 of 2025 is remitted back
(remanded back) to the Addl. Tahasildar, Bhubaneswar (O.P. No.4) to
decide the same afresh as per law within a period of two months from the
date of appearance of the parties in the said Mutation Case No.19135 of
2025 after providing opportunity of being heard to the parties thereof
including the petitioner in full compliance of the principles of natural
justice.
6. The parties to this writ petition are directed to appear before the
Addl. Tahasildar, Bhubaneswar (O.P. No.4) in Mutation Case No.19135
of 2025 on dated 08.12.2025 and to produce the certified copy of this
judgment for the purpose of receiving the directions of O.P. No.4 as to
further proceedings of the said Mutation Case No.19135 of 2025.
7. As such, this writ petition filed by the petitioners is disposed of
finally.
(A.C. Behera), Judge.
Orissa High Court, Cuttack.
29.11.2025//Utkalika Nayak// Junior Stenographer
Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed Signed by: UTKALIKA NAYAK Reason: Authentication Location: High Court of Orissa, Cuttack Date: 01-Dec-2025 10:50:14
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!