Tuesday, 19, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Venkatesan vs V.Amudha
2025 Latest Caselaw 597 Mad

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 597 Mad
Judgement Date : 6 June, 2025

Madras High Court

Venkatesan vs V.Amudha on 6 June, 2025

Author: N. Sathish Kumar
Bench: N. Sathish Kumar
                                                                                          C.R.P.No.3826 of 2024

                                  IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                                                   DATED : 06.06.2025

                                                              CORAM :

                            THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N. SATHISH KUMAR

                                                 C.R.P.No.3826 of 2024
                                                         and
                                                C.M.P.No.20999 of 2024

                   1.Venkatesan
                   2.Krishnaveni                                                              ... Petitioners

                                                                 Vs.
                   V.Amudha                                                                  ... Respondent

                   PRAYER: Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the
                   Constitution of India against the docket order of delivery dated 06.09.2024
                   passed in E.P.No.102 of 2016 in O.S.No.493 of 2008 on the file of the
                   Principal District Court at Chengalpattu.


                                    For Petitioners       :    Mr.N.Krishnamurthy

                                    For Respondent        :    Mr.C.Prabakaran


                                                           ORDER

Challenging the order of the Principal District Court at Chengalpattu,

dated 06.09.2024, in E.P.No.102 of 2016 in O.S.No.493 of 2008, ordering

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 10/06/2025 11:31:10 am )

delivery of possession of the subject property, the present revision has been

filed.

2.Originally, the suit in O.S.No.493 of 2008 was filed by the

respondent for declaration of title and delivery of possession. The suit was

decreed ex parte on 02.03.2010. The respondent/decree holder filed the

Execution Petition in E.P.No.102 of 2016 and the Execution Court ordered

delivery by impugned order dated 06.09.2024. Challenging the same, the

present revision has been filed by the judgment debtors.

3.Learned counsel for the revision petitioners/judgment debtors

would mainly submit that the ex parte judgment in the suit in O.S.No.493 of

2008 is a single line order and the judgment and decree in the suit has

already been challenged by them in a separate suit in O.S.No.162 of 2017

before the same Court and also with a prayer for declaration of title in

respect of the same property. Though the suit filed by the revision

petitioners was originally rejected by the trial Court by order dated

22.07.2024, the revision petitioners filed an appeal in A.S.No.1114 of 2024,

and this Court, by judgment dated 26.03.2025, set aside the decree and

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 10/06/2025 11:31:10 am )

judgment of the trial Court in O.S.No.162 of 2017, and directed the trial

Court to dispose of the suit within a period of six months from the date of

receipt of a copy of the order. Now, the suit is pending before the trial

Court. Therefore, the learned counsel would submit that, if delivery is

effected at this stage, it will lead to complications. Hence, he prayed for

setting aside the order of delivery.

4.Whereas, the only grievance of the learned counsel appearing for

the respondent is that, on the strength of the judgment of this Court in

A.S.No.1114 of 2024, the revision petitioner is trying to put up construction

and also trying to alienate the property.

5.Heard the learned counsel on either side and perused the entire

materials available on record.

6.Since the only concern is with regard to the alienation and

construction over the property, this Court is of the view that, as the matter is

now pending before the trial Court, the revision petitioner shall not make

any alienation or put up any further construction and let the property be

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 10/06/2025 11:31:10 am )

maintained as it is. The rights of the parties will be decided by the trial

Court in the suit in O.S.No.162 of 2017 filed by the revision petitioners. In

order to protect the interest of the parties, the execution proceedings in

E.P.No.102 of 2016 in O.S.No.493 of 2008 shall stand terminated for the

present and the same will be revived subject to the result of the suit in

O.S.No.162 of 2017 pending before the trial Court.

7.With the above directions, this Civil Revision Petition is disposed

of. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

06.06.2025 mkn

Internet : Yes Index : Yes / No Speaking order / Nonspeaking order Neutral Citation : Yes / No

To

The Principal District Judge, Chengalpattu.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 10/06/2025 11:31:10 am )

N. SATHISH KUMAR, J.

mkn

06.06.2025

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 10/06/2025 11:31:10 am )

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter