Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 568 Mad
Judgement Date : 5 June, 2025
C.R.P.No.2012 of 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 05.06.2025
CORAM :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N. SATHISH KUMAR
C.R.P.No.2012 of 2025
and
C.M.P.No.11610 of 2025
D.Saravanan ... Petitioner
Vs.
P.Elango ... Respondent
PRAYER: Civil Revision Petition filed under Section 115 of the Code of
Civil Procedure against the fair and decretal order dated 08.04.2025 for the
issue of a fresh proclamation and sale on 04.06.2025 in E.P.No.881 of 2020
in O.S.No.1452 of 2015 on the file of the XXVI Assistant City Civil Court,
Chennai.
For Petitioner : Ms.R.Kalaivani
for Mr.V.Balasubramani
For Respondent : Mr.S.Gunaseelan
Page 1 of 5
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 10/06/2025 11:31:09 am )
C.R.P.No.2012 of 2025
ORDER
Challenging the order of the XXVI Assistant City Civil Court,
Chennai, dated 04.06.2025 in E.P.No.881 of 2020 in O.S.No.1452 of 2015,
directing a fresh proclamation and sale on 04.06.2025, the present Civil
Revision Petition has been filed.
2.The respondent/decree holder has filed the Execution Petition in
E.P.No.881 of 2020 to execute the ex parte decree passed in O.S.No.1452 of
2015 on 01.07.2022. The Execution Court had earlier passed an order on
20.12.2024 directing proclamation of sale and since no one participated in
the earlier public auction, the sale was not materialised, and therefore, on
08.04.2025, the impugned order has been passed for fresh proclamation
fixing the sale on 04.06.2025. Challenging the said order dated 08.04.2025,
the present revision has been filed by the judgment debtor.
3.Though this Court earlier granted interim order in this Civil
Revision Petition and directed the petitioner to deposit a sum of Rs.5 Lakhs,
at the outset, this Court is of the view that the very Civil Revision Petition
itself is not maintainable for the simple reason that the proclamation has not
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 10/06/2025 11:31:09 am )
been filed and not drawn by the Court. The Execution Court has simply
passed an order directing the decree holder to file a fresh proclamation.
Once a proclamation is filed, such proclamation has to be drawn up after
notice to the decree holder and the judgment debtor stating the date, time
and place of sale. Therefore, even before filing of any such proclamation,
as a matter of right, the Execution Petition cannot be stalled. First, let the
decree holder file a proclamation and thereafter, the Execution Court shall
hear both sides and proclamation shall be drawn.
4.The other concern of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that
the property of the petitioner is worth more than Rs.1 Crore and the entire
property is sought to be sold. That has to be established before the
Execution Court. The Execution Court shall strictly follow the provisions
under Order 21 Rule 64 of CPC while bringing the property for sale and any
amount deposited pursuant to the orders of this Court shall be given due
adjustment towards the E.P. amount.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 10/06/2025 11:31:09 am )
5.With the above observations, this Civil Revision Petition is
dismissed. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is
closed.
05.06.2025
mkn
Internet : Yes Index : Yes / No Speaking order / Nonspeaking order Neutral Citation : Yes / No
To
The XXVI Assistant Judge, City Civil Court, Chennai.
N. SATHISH KUMAR, J.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 10/06/2025 11:31:09 am )
mkn
05.06.2025
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 10/06/2025 11:31:09 am )
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!