Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 1337 Mad
Judgement Date : 23 July, 2025
W.A.(MD)No.684 of 2024
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED : 23.07.2025
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN
and
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.RAJASEKAR
W.A.(MD)No.684 of 2024
and
C.M.P.(MD)No.5051 of 2024
1.The Director General of Police,
Chennai - 4.
2.The Deputy Inspector General of Police,
Trichy Region, Trichy.
3.The Superintendent of Police,
Pudukottai District. ... Appellants
Vs.
V.Selvam ... Respondent
Prayer : Writ Appeal filed under Clause XV of Letters Patent, to allow
the writ appeal by setting aside the order passed in W.P.(MD)No.9292 of
2019 dated 24.01.2023 on the file of this Court.
1/6
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 30/07/2025 10:42:38 am )
W.A.(MD)No.684 of 2024
For Appellants : Mr.A.Kannan,
Addl. Government Pleader.
For Respondent : Mr.M.Pitchai Muthu
JUDGMENT
(By G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J.)
Heard both sides.
2.The writ petitioner joined the police department as Constable.
He was subsequently promoted. His wife gave a matrimonial complaint
against him and it was registered as Crime No.4 of 2005. Subsequently,
it was taken up for trial in C.C.No.329 of 2005 on the file of Judicial
Magistrate, Pudukottai. Even during the pendency of the criminal
prosecution, he was departmentally dealt with. He was found guilty. He
was eventually awarded with punishment of stoppage of increment for a
period of two years with cumulative effect. Challenging the said order,
the writ petitioner filed W.P.(MD)No.9292 of 2019. The learned Single
Judge vide order dated 24.01.2023 quashed the orders impugned therein
and allowed the writ petition. Aggrieved by same, this writ appeal has
been filed.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 30/07/2025 10:42:38 am )
3.There is considerable force in the stand of the learned Additional
Government Pleader that challenge was mounted by the writ petitioner
rather belatedly. Yet, we are not inclined to interfere with the order of the
learned Single Judge for the simple reason that the cause of action
underlying the departmental proceedings as well as the criminal
prosecution is one and the same. Same set of witnesses were examined
in the criminal case as well as departmental enquiry. When the Criminal
Court had acquitted the writ petitioner, we are of the view that a contra
finding rendered by the disciplinary authority cannot be allowed to stand.
4.It is in this view of the matter, we decline to interfere with the
order of the learned Single Judge and the writ appeal is dismissed. No
costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.
(G.R.S. J.,) & (K.R.S. J.,)
23.07.2025
NCC : Yes/No
Index : Yes / No
Internet : Yes/ No
ias
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 30/07/2025 10:42:38 am )
To:
1.The Director General of Police,
Chennai - 4.
2.The Deputy Inspector General of Police, Trichy Region, Trichy.
3.The Superintendent of Police, Pudukottai District.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 30/07/2025 10:42:38 am )
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 30/07/2025 10:42:38 am )
G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J.
and K.RAJASEKAR, J.
ias
23.07.2025
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 30/07/2025 10:42:38 am )
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!