Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 1335 Mad
Judgement Date : 23 July, 2025
C.R.P.(PD).(MD)No.345 of 2022
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED: 23.07.2025
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI
C.R.P.[PD](MD)No.345 of 2022
and
C.M.P.(MD).Nos.1492 & 1494 of 2022
The India Cements Limited,
Represented by its
Senior Executive President,
Mr.T.S.Raghupathy ...Petitioner
Vs.
M.Arivanandam ...Respondent
PRAYER: Civil Revision Petition is filed under Article 227 of Constitution of
India, praying to set aside the fair and excreetal order dated 22.10.2010 passed
in E.P.No.46 of 2006 by the learned Principal District Judge, Madurai and the
consequential order dated 22.09.2021 passed in E.A.No.9 of 2014 in E.P.No.46
of 2006.
For Petitioner : Mr.M.Aravind Subramaniam
For Respondent : No Appearance
1/4
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 28/07/2025 07:39:29 pm )
C.R.P.(PD).(MD)No.345 of 2022
ORDER
This Civil Revision Petition has been filed to set aside the fair and
decreetal order dated 22.10.2010 passed in E.P.No.46 of 2006 by the learned
Principal District Judge, Madurai, and the consequential order dated 22.09.2021
passed in E.A.No.9 of 2014 in the same Execution Petition.
2. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that the
petitioner is the decree holder. The petitioner filed a petition in E.P.No.46 of
2006 before the learned Principal District Judge, Madurai, seeking attachment
of the judgment debtor’s properties. However, by order dated 22.10.2010, the
trial Court ordered attachment only in respect of items 1 to 3 and declined to
attach the remaining properties. Aggrieved by the same, the petitioner filed
E.A.No.9 of 2014 under Section 151 of the Civil Procedure Code, seeking
permission to bring the remaining properties to sale in case the attached
properties were insufficient to satisfy the decreetal amount. However, the said
application was dismissed on 22.09.2021. Challenging the same, the present
Civil Revision Petition has been filed.
3. The learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that this Court
may grant liberty to the petitioner to proceed with respect three properties that
were already attached in E.P.No.46 of 2006 and also to take further steps in
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 28/07/2025 07:39:29 pm ) C.R.P.(PD).(MD)No.345 of 2022
accordance with law if the value of the attached properties is insufficient to
satisfy the decree.
4. In view of the above submissions and the facts of the case, this Civil
Revision Petition stands dismissed. However, liberty is granted to the petitioner
to proceed with the execution of the decree in respect of three properties already
attached in E.P.No.46 of 2006. If the value of the attached properties is found
insufficient to satisfy the decree, it is open to the petitioner to take appropriate
steps to bring other properties of the judgment debtor to sale, in the manner
known to law. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are
closed.
23.07.2025
Internet:Yes/No Index:Yes/No TSGTo
1.The Principal District Judge, Madurai.
2.The Section Officer, VR Section, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 28/07/2025 07:39:29 pm ) C.R.P.(PD).(MD)No.345 of 2022
M.DHANDAPANI, J.
TSG
C.R.P.(PD).(MD)No.345 of 2022
23.07.2025
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 28/07/2025 07:39:29 pm )
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!