Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 19017 Mad
Judgement Date : 26 September, 2024
Rev.Aplw.No.6 of 2020
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 26.09.2024
CORAM :
THE HON'BLE MR.D.KRISHNAKUMAR, ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE
AND
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE P.B.BALAJI
Rev.Aplw.No.6 of 2020
in W.A.No. SR 110612 of 2023 and M.P.No.1 of 2014
R.Krishnamoorthy .. Petitioner
Vs
1.The Chief Educational Officer,
Thiruvallur District,
Thiruvalllur.
2.The Director of Elementary Education,
College Road,
Chennai-600 006.
3.The District Employment Officer,
Thiruvallur District,
Thiruvallur.
4.The Joint Director (E) of
Employment and Training,
Chepauk, Chennai-600 005. .. Respondents
____________
Page 1 of 5
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Rev.Aplw.No.6 of 2020
Prayer : Review Application filed under Order 47, Rule 1 read with
Section 114 of CPC against the judgment dated 1.10.2019 passed in
W.A.No. SR 110612 of 2023 and M.P.No.1 of 2014.
For the Petitioner : Mr.P.Selvaraj
For the Respondents : Mr.J.C.Durairaj
Addl. Government Pleader
ORDER
(Delivered by the Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice)
This review application is filed against the judgment dated
1.10.2019 passed in W.A.No. SR 110612 of 2013 and M.P.No.1 of
2014.
2. The petitioner seeks appointment to the post of Secondary
Grade Assistant Teacher with effect from 26.7.1997. Such appointment
is sought by the petitioner on the ground that he was sponsored
through the Employment Exchange. The writ court dismissed the writ
petition holding that the petitioner is not entitled to the relief prayed
for by him. Against which, writ appeal is preferred with an application
for condonation of delay and the same were dismissed by this Court
recording the submission made by learned Government Advocate that
____________
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
the petitioner had not renewed his name in the District Employment
Officer's Register and hence his name has not been recommended for
the post of Middle Level Teacher. But, in the year 2004, the petitioner
has already been appointed and that therefore, nothing survives in the
writ appeal. Alleging error in the said judgment, the petitioner has
filed the present review application.
3. Be that as it may, the policy of recruiting persons through the
Employment Exchange has now undergone sea change. Therefore,
nothing survives for consideration in the present review application.
On merits also, there is no error apparent on the face of record to
review the judgment dated 1.10.2019 passed in the writ appeal SR.
4. The review application is dismissed as infructuous. There
shall be no order as to costs.
(D.K.K., ACJ.) (P.B.B, J.)
26.09.2024
Index : Yes/No
NC : Yes/No
bbr
____________
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
To
1.The Chief Educational Officer, Thiruvallur District, Thiruvalllur.
2.The Director of Elementary Education, College Road, Chennai-600 006.
3.The District Employment Officer, Thiruvallur District, Thiruvallur.
4.The Joint Director (E) of Employment and Training, Chepauk, Chennai-600 005.
____________
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
THE HON'BLE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE AND P.B.BALAJI, J.
bbr
26.09.2024
____________
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!