Tuesday, 19, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

K.Jothilingam vs S.Lakshmi
2024 Latest Caselaw 18766 Mad

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 18766 Mad
Judgement Date : 24 September, 2024

Madras High Court

K.Jothilingam vs S.Lakshmi on 24 September, 2024

Author: A.D.Jagadish Chandira

Bench: A.D.Jagadish Chandira

                                                                     C.R.P. No.722 of 2024 & C.M.P.No.3645 of 2024

                                   IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                                                         DATED 24.09.2024

                                                              CORAM

                           THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA

                                                   C.R.P. No.722 of 2024
                                                  & C.M.P.No.3645 of 2024

                     K.Jothilingam                                                           ... Petitioner

                                                             Vs.
                     S.Lakshmi                                                               ... Respondent

                     Prayer: Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India
                     against the judgment and decree dated 08.01.2024 made in R.L.T.A.
                     No.73 of 2023 on the file of XX Additional District and Sessions Court,
                     City Civil Court, Chennai, confirming the order and decree dated
                     14.12.2022 made in R.L.T.O.P.No.461 of 2021 on the file of X Judge,
                     Small Causes Court, Chennai.
                                        For petitioner               : Mr.G.Gubendhiran
                                        For Respondent               : Mr.Adinayarana Rao

                                                              ORDER

Challenging the order passed by the learned XX Additional District

and Sessions Judge City Civil Court, Chennai, dated 08.01.2024 in

R.L.T.A. No.73 of 2023 confirming the order passed by the learned X

Judge, Small Causes Court, Chennai, dated 14.12.2022 in

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

C.R.P. No.722 of 2024 & C.M.P.No.3645 of 2024

R.L.T.O.P.No.461 of 2021, the above civil revision petition has been

filed.

2.The present civil revision petition arises under the provisions of

Tamil Nadu Regulation of Rights and Responsibilities of Landlords and

Tenants Act, 2017. The relationship of landlord and tenant is not

disputed. The petitioner is the tenant and the respondent is the landlord.

The petitioner had taken tenancy of the property bearing shop No.38,

Ground Floor, New Vijayaragavapuram, 80 Feet Road, Saligramam,

Chennai-600 093, of an extent of 180 sq.ft., based on the rental

agreement dated 01.06.2009 for a period of 11 months commencing from

the said date viz.,01.06.2009 and initially, the rent was fixed at

Rs.6,000/- and it was orally renewed thereafter and the rent was fixed at

Rs.7,000/- per month excluding Electricity Bill charges. Thereafter,

several disputes had arisen between the parties in respect of willful

default on the part of the petitioner. Thereafter, the revision petitioner had

willfully failed to pay rent to the respondent and though he had agreed to

vacate the premises, he did not do so and thereby, the

respondent/landlord had given a police complaint and during the police

enquiry, the petitioner also agreed to vacate the property and adjust his

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

C.R.P. No.722 of 2024 & C.M.P.No.3645 of 2024

advance and thereafter, neither vacated nor paid the rent. Subsequently,

the petitioner/tenant had filed O.S.No.6505 of 2017 on the file of IV

Assistant City Civil Court, Chennai, and had obtained injunction. Even

thereafter, when the respondent/landlord had tried to evict him, he had

filed contempt petition and the same is pending. In the meanwhile, the

petitioner had also filed RCOP No.812 of 2018 on the file of XIV Court

of Small Causes, Chennai, in which, by an order dated 09.11.2022, the

petitioner was permitted to deposit monthly rent without any default from

the date of arrears into the credit of this RCOP within 15 days from the

date of this order and further, the petitioner was directed to deposit the

future monthly rents on or before 7th day of every consecutive English

calendar month. The respondent/landlord had filed RLTOP No.461 of

2021 before the X Court of Small Causes, Chennai, under Section

21(2)(a), 21(2)(b) and 21(2)(d) of the Tamil Nadu Regulation of Rights

and Responsibilities of Landlords and Tenants Act, 2017, in which, the

learned Judge, by an order dated 14.12.2022, held that the petitioner had

not filed the written rental agreement as required under Section 4(2) of

the Act and hence, the respondent/landlord is entitled to the order of

repossession under Section 21(2)(a) of Act and directed the petitioner/

tenant to vacate and hand over the vacant possession of the petition https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

C.R.P. No.722 of 2024 & C.M.P.No.3645 of 2024

premises to the respondent/landlord within a period of one month from

the date of the order. Challenging the said order, the petitioner/tenant had

filed an appeal in RLTA No.73 of 2023 before the XX Additional District

and Sessions Court, City Civil Court, Chennai. The learned Judge, by an

order dated 08.01.2024, while confirming the order of the learned X

Judge, Court of Small Causes, Chennai, had dismissed the Appeal filed

by the petitioner/tenant. Aggrieved against the said order, the

petitioner/tenant had filed the present civil revision petition.

3.The only ground raised by the petitioner/tenant in this civil

revision petition is that this petition for eviction on the ground of non

entering into a written lease agreement has been filed even prior to expiry

of 575 days under the TNRRRLT Act, 2017 after issuance of notice dated

30.12.1920 and thereby, he would seek to set aside the orders passed by

the courts below.

4.Per contra, learned counsel appearing for the respondent/landlord

would submit that the Act came into force on 22.02.2019 and 90 days

time provided was extended to 210 days as per amended Section 4(2)

of the Act for the tenant to enter into a lease agreement and registration of

the same and subsequently, it was extended to 575 days from the date of https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

C.R.P. No.722 of 2024 & C.M.P.No.3645 of 2024

commencement of the amended Act 3 of 2020 dated 15.02.2020. He

would further submit that in the present case, the period of 575 days for

entering into the tenancy agreement registration had expired on

18.09.2020 and R.L.T.O.P. No.461 of 2021 was filed on 04.08.2021

after expiry of 575 days and thereby, the ground taken by the petitioner

cannot be sustained and seeks to dismiss the civil revision petition.

5.In support of his contention, the learned counsel for the

respondent/landlord had placed reliance on the judgment of this Court in

S.Muruganandam Vs. J.Joseph (2022 Supreme Court Cases Online

Madras 958), wherein the position of law has been settled and held that

in case the landlord and tenant do not enter into a tenancy agreement as

contemplated under the TNRRRLT Act, 2017, then the tenant incurs the

wrath of Section 21(2)(a) of the Act and the period has to be calculated

from the date of coming into the force of the Act and the petition can be

filed after 575 days from the date of coming into force of the Act.

6.Heard the learned counsel on either side and perused the

materials available on record.

7.A perusal of records would show that the rental agreement for a https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

C.R.P. No.722 of 2024 & C.M.P.No.3645 of 2024

period of 11 months was entered into between the parties on 01.06.2009

prior to the commencement of the Act and the said agreement had expired

prior the commencement of the Act and neither an agreement in writing

as required under Section 4(2) of the Act has been entered into nor the

existing agreement has been registered within a period of 575 days from

the date of the commencement of the new Act. Admittedly, in the present

case, there is no agreement between the petitioner and the respondent as

envisaged under the Act. On the basis of this factual finding, the Rent

Controller ordered eviction and it has been rightly confirmed by the

Appellate Authority. Both the Courts below had rightly held that in view

of failure of the parties to enter into a written agreement as mandated

under Section 4(2) of the TNRRRLT Act, 2017, the petitioner is liable to

be evicted and the landlord is entitled to seek re-possession of tenanted

premises by invoking provision under Section 21(1)(a) of TNRRRLT Act,

2017. In the light of the above discussion, this Court does not find any

illegality or irregularity in the order of the Courts below and the civil

revision fails and the same is dismissed. No

costs. Consequently, connected civil miscellaneous petition is also https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

C.R.P. No.722 of 2024 & C.M.P.No.3645 of 2024

dismissed.

09.09.2024

Index: Yes/No raa

To

1. XX Additional District and Sessions Court, City Civil Court, Chennai.

2. X Court, Court of Small Causes, Chennai.

A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA, J.

raa https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

C.R.P. No.722 of 2024 & C.M.P.No.3645 of 2024

09.09.2024

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter