Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 17943 Mad
Judgement Date : 9 September, 2024
W.A.No.2493 OF 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 09.09.2024
CORAM :
THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE J.NISHA BANU
AND
THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE R.KALAIMATHI
W.A.Nos.2493 of 2024
and
CMP.No.17855 of 2024
M/s.Jasmine Excel
rep.by its Partner
M.H.Khaleel Rahman
No./1, Venkata Subba Reddy Street,
Athipet, Chennai 58. ..Petitioner/Appellant
Vs
The Assistant Commissioner (CT)
Koyambedu Assessment Circle,
Station Market Management Committee
Building, Koyambedu,
Chennai 600 107. .... Respondent/Respondent
PRAYER: Writ Appeal filed under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent to set aside
the order of the learned Judge dated 22.01.2021, passed in W.P.No.28639 of
2010.
1/5
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
W.A.No.2493 OF 2024
For Appellant : Mr.P.Ramesh
For Respondent : Mr.G.Nanmaran, Spl.G.P
JUDGMENT
(Judgment of the Court was delivered by J.NISHA BANU.,J.)
The Writ Appeal is filed as against the order passed by the learned
Single Judge in W.P.No.28639 of 201 dated 22.01.2021.
2. The learned Single Judge set aside the impugned order of the
respondent dated 29.10.2010 and remitted the case back to the respondent-
Assistant Commissioner (CT), to pass a fresh order. The learned Single Judge
further directed the writ petitioner to deposit 50% of the disputed tax with the
respondent.
3. We heard both sides and perused the records and the impugned order.
4. The learned Single Judge has given a finding that the writ petitioner
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.A.No.2493 OF 2024
abused the jurisdiction of this court by filing the writ petition and even though
the petitioner had a choice to approach the Appellate Commissioner against
the order impugned, the petitioner has gained time and postponed the liability.
The learned Single Judge, further set aside the impugned assessment order
dated 29.10.2010 and directed the petitioner to deposit 50% of the disputed tax
within one month. However, the appellant filed this writ appeal with delay of
1084 days, stating that since they are not in a position to settle the dispute
under the Samadhan Scheme, this writ appeal is filed.
5. In view of the observations made by the learned Single Judge in
paragraphs 11 to 14 of the order dated 22.01.2021, this writ appeal is
dismissed. The matter for consideration is already before the respondent-
Assistant Commissioner (CT). So it is for the appellant/assessee to go before
the respondent and substantiate their stand after complying with the conditions
stipulated in the order passed by the learned Single Judge dated 22.01.2021.
6. The respondent-Assistant Commissioner (CT) shall de-novo consider
the matter and pass a reasoned order on merits.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.A.No.2493 OF 2024
7. Finding no merits in the case, the Writ Appeal is dismissed. No costs.
Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.
(J.N.B.J.) (R.K.M.,J.)
09.09.2024
Internet:Yes/No
Index: Yes/No
sk/nvsri
To
The Assistant Commissioner (CT)
Koyambedu Assessment Circle,
Station Market Management Committee Building, Koyambedu, Chennai 600 107.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.A.No.2493 OF 2024
J.NISHA BANU ,J.
and R.KALAIMATHI, J.
sk/nvsri
09.09.2024
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!