Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 17796 Mad
Judgement Date : 6 September, 2024
W.P.No.26099 of 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Dated:06.09.2024
Coram:
THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE G. JAYACHANDRAN
W.P.No.26099 of 2024
V.Sivakumar .. Petitioner
/versus/
The Deputy Superintendent of Police,
Mannarkudi Sub-Division,
Thiruvarur Division,
Thiruvarur. .. Respondent
Writ Petition has been filed under Article 226 of the
Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus
to call for the records pertaining to the impugned proceedings passed by
the respondent herein in Na.Ka.No.87/Thu.Ka.Ka./Mannai/2024, dated
24.08.2024 and quash the same and consequently direct the respondent
herein to permit the installation of Vinayagar Idols in the requested places
in representation dated 24.08.2024 by the petitioner.
For Petitioner :Mr.D.Kamatchi
For Respondent :Mr.S.Udaya Kumar
Govt.Advocate (Crl.Side)
-------
1/5
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
W.P.No.26099 of 2024
ORDER
The petitioner herein, the District Secretary, Hindu Munnani
Organisation, Thiruvarur District (Needamangalam Union), has sought
permission to install Vinayagar idol at three places in
Vaduvoor during the Vinayagar Chathurthi festival and take procession
for immersion at Vadavaru Big Bridge River bunk. The said the
representation has been considered by the Deputy Superintendent of
Police, Mannarkodi Sub Division and rejected it vide, proceedings dated
24.08.2024 for all the three places. The rejection order is under challenge
stating that the reason stated for the rejection are per se untenable,
improper and contrary to the Constitutional Right conferred to citizen of
India and the judgment rendered by the Division Bench of this Court in
W.A.Nos.743 & 2064 of 2019 followed by W.P.Nos.29039 of 2023, etc.,
2. On perusing the impugned proceedings of the Deputy
Superintendent of Police, Mannarkodi, this Court finds that none of the
reasons carry merits for consideration and apparently the rejection order
is passed with malafide intention to prevent the petitioner from carrying
out the religious activity. The impugned order is contrary to the judgment
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
of this Court passed earlier. Hence, the impugned order stands quashed
and the petitioner is permitted to carry out the religious faith and activity
by installing the Vinayagar Idol in the place mentioned in the
representation and take out the procession peacefully in the route
mentioned in his representation, after giving undertaking to the
respondent that the procession will be carried out peacefully without
causing disturbance to the public transport and normal activity.
3. With the above observation, this Writ Petition is disposed of.
No costs.
06.09.2024
Index:yes/no Neutral citation:yes/no ari Note:Issue Order copy on 06.09.2024
To:
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
1.The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Mannarkudi Sub-Division, Thiruvarur Division, Thiruvarur.
2.The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras.
DR.G.JAYACHANDRAN,J.
ari
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
06.09.2024
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!