Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 17546 Mad
Judgement Date : 4 September, 2024
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED: 04.09.2024
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE R.VIJAYAKUMAR
W.P.(MD)No.21120 of 2023
and
W.M.P(MD)No.17526 of 2023
B.Paramasivan ... Petitioner
Vs.
1.The General Manager,
Tamil Nadu State Transport
Corporation(Tirunelveli) Limited,
Tirunelveli Region,
Tirunelveli.
2.The Branch Manager,
Tamil Nadu State Transport
Corporation(Tirunelveli) Limited,
Papanaam Branch,
Papanasam, Tirunelveli District.
3.The Branch Manager,
Tamil Nadu State Transport
Corporation(Tirunelveli) Limited,
Thiyasanvilai Branch,
Thiyasanvilai, Tirunelveli District. ...Respondents
PRAYER: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to
issue a writ of Certiorari, to calling for the records pertaining to the impugned
1/4
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
order of Transfer passed by the 1st respondent in A.Aa.No.
10376/Niya5/Tha.A.Po.Ka./Thili/2022, dated 27.07.2023, transferring the
petitioner to Papanasam to Thiyasanvilai Branch of the 1st respondent
corporation and quash the same.
For Petitioner : Mr.K.Guhan
For Respondents : Mr.K.Ramaiah
Standing Counsel for R1 to R3
*****
ORDER
The instant writ petition has been filed by a Conductor of the respondent
transport corporation, challenging his order of transfer from Papanasam branch
to Thisayanvilai branch, primarily on the ground that when a charge memo has
been issued to the writ petitioner, the present impugned order has been passed on
27.07.2023, and therefore, it is a punitive transfer.
2.The judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court of Registrar General
Vs. R.Pevachi reported in 2011 (12) SCC 137, in paragraph No.36, has held that
whenever complaints are received as against the concerned employee and
departmental proceedings are initiated, and the transfer is effected by the
management, the said transfer can never be considered to be punitive in nature.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis The judgment of the Hon'ble Division Bench of our High Court of Secretary to
Government v. Dr.S.Raja Rajan reported in 2015 (3) MLJ 769 in paragraph No.
6, has categorically held that on account of inefficiency of a Government
servant, the Government is competent to transfer and the same cannot be
considered to be punitive in nature. In the present case, merely because a charge
memo has been issued to the writ petitioner, unless the same is reflected in the
order of transfer, the same cannot be considered to be punitive in nature.
3.In the view of the above submissions, there are no merits in the writ
petition. Accordingly, this writ petition stands dismissed. No costs.
Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is also closed.
04.09.2024
NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes/No Internet: Yes/No
RJR
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis R.VIJAYAKUMAR, J.
RJR
and
04.09.2024
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!