Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 17429 Mad
Judgement Date : 3 September, 2024
CMA.No.4549 of 2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 03.09.2024
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE J. NISHA BANU
&
THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE R. KALAIMATHI
C.M.A.No.4549 oF 2019
Pavithra .... Appellant
Vs.
Saravanan ... Respondent
Prayer: Civil Miscellaneous Appeal filed under Section 19 of the Family
Court Act, praying to set aside the order passed in I.A.No.1 of 2019 in
I.A.No.3146 of 2017 in F.C.O.P.No.1251 of 2017, dated 09.04.2019 on the
file of the learned Principal Family Court Judge at Chennai and direct the
respondent to pay maintenance at the rate of Rs.15,000/- per month.
For Appellant : Mr.V.V. Sairam
For Respondent : notice served, no appearance
1 of 4
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
CMA.No.4549 of 2019
JUDGMENT
[Judgment of the Court was made by J. NISHA BANU, J.]
The appellant has preferred this Civil Miscellaneous Appeal
challenging the order passed in I.A.No.1 of 2019 in I.A.No.3146 of 2017 in
F.C.O.P.No.1251 of 2017 by the learned Principal Family Court Judge at
Chennai and for a direction to the respondent to pay maintenance at the rate
of Rs.15,000/- per month.
2. Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned counsel
appearing for the appellant/wife, citing the judgment of this Court in the case
of G.V.N.S.Siva Prasad vs. V.Jyostna Devi made in C.M.A.No.1018 of 2022
dated 27.03.2024, wherein, it has been held that as per Section 19 of the
Family Courts Act, an appeal against the interlocutory application will not lie
and the appeal will lie only as against the judgment or order of the Family
Court and submitted that as against the interlocutory applications/ interim
maintenance, only Civil Revision Petition under Article 227 of the
2 of 4
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Constitution of India would lie and not Civil Miscellaneous Appeal. Stating
so, he seeks permission of this court to withdraw the CMA with liberty to file
Civil Revision Petition.
3. In view of the above, granting such liberty, this Civil Miscellaneous
Appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. On filing of Civil Revision Petition, for
the purpose of limitation, the period spent in prosecuting the CMA shall be
excluded. No costs.
4. If the learned counsel for the appellant requests for return of
certified copy of the impugned order, the same shall be returned to him
forthwith under due acknowledgement.
[J.N.B.,J.] [R.K.M,J.]
03.09.2024
Index: yes/no
Internet:yes/no
msr
To
3 of 4
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
The Principal Family Court at Chennai.
J. NISHA BANU, J.
& R. KALAIMATHI, J.
msr
03.09.2024
4 of 4
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!