Monday, 18, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

B.Pankajam vs S.Manohar
2024 Latest Caselaw 17194 Mad

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 17194 Mad
Judgement Date : 2 September, 2024

Madras High Court

B.Pankajam vs S.Manohar on 2 September, 2024

Author: R.Hemalatha

Bench: R.Hemalatha

                                                                                     CMA.No.2457 of 2022


                                  IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                                                   DATED: 02.09.2024

                                                        CORAM:

                                  THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE R.HEMALATHA

                                                 C.M.A.No.2457 of 2022

                     1. B.Pankajam
                        B.Krishna Kumar (Died)                                        ... Appellants
                     (Cause title accepted vide orders dated 18.03.2022 made
                     in CMP No.4286/2022 in CMA SR.No. 8620/2022)

                                                              vs.
                     1. S.Manohar
                     2. The United India Insurance Co. Ltd.,
                        25A, 3/2, II Floor, Ami Midtown,
                        D.B.Road, R.S.Puram,
                        Coimbatore - 641 002.                                        ... Respondents

                     PRAYER: Civil Miscellaneous Appeal filed under Section 173 of the
                     Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, against the Award, dated 19.06.2017 in
                     M.C.O.P.1684/2013 on the file of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal,
                     Special Subordinate Judge, Coimbatore.

                                             For Appellants         : Mr.N.Ishtiaq Ahmed
                                             For R2                 : Ms.I.Malar

                                                    JUDGMENT

Challenging the Award, dated 19.06.2017 passed by the Motor

Accident Claims Tribunal, Coimbatore in M.C.O.P.1684/2013, the present

Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is filed by the claimants.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

2. A perusal of the records shows that the claimants have filed

the claim petition under Section 166(1)(c) of the Motor Vehicles Act,

1988. Since the claimants did not file any oral or documentary evidence,

the Tribunal converted the claim petition as one under Section 140(2) of

the Motor vehicles Act and awarded a sum of Rs.50,000/- to them.

3. Heard Mr.N.Ishtiaq Ahmed, learned counsel for the

appellants and Ms.I.Malar, learned counsel appearing for the second

respondent.

4. Mr.N.Ishtiaq Ahmed, learned counsel for the appellants

contended that the son of the claimants, Boopalan died just four days prior

to the date of passing of decree and Judgment by the Special Subordinate

Judge, Coimbatore in M.C.O.P.1684/2013 and therefore the appellants

could not attend the Court for adducing evidence. Therefore, he prayed

for remitting the matter back to the Tribunal for the purpose of affording

the claimants an opportunity to let in evidence.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

5. Per contra, Ms.I.Malar, learned counsel appearing for the

second respondent contended that the documents have not been filed

before this Court and therefore there is no question of remitting the matter

back to the Tribunal.

6. A perusal of the records filed along with C.M.P.11437/2024

shows that a copy of the FIR, final report and medical bills were filed. In

the circumstances, the orders passed by the Tribunal is liable to be set

aside and the case is remitted back to the same Tribunal to consider the

claim petition on merits and in accordance with law after giving sufficient

opportunity to both the parties to let in evidence. The claimants shall

appear before the Tribunal within a month from the date of receipt a copy

of this order and the Tribunal shall dispose of the case on merits within a

period of three months thereafter.

7. In the result,

i. This Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is allowed. No costs.

ii. The Award, dated 19.06.2017 in M.C.O.P.1684/2013

on the file of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal /

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Special Subordinate Judge, Coimbatore is set aside.

iii. M.C.O.P.1684/2013 is remitted back to the Motor

Accidents Claims Tribunal / Special Subordinate

Judge, Coimbatore to consider the claim petition afresh

in accordance with law.

iv. The appellants / claimants shall appear before the

Tribunal, within a period of one month from the date of

receipt of a copy of this order/uploading of the order.

v. The Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal / Special

Subordinate Judge, Coimbatore is directed to afford

sufficient opportunity to the parties concerned to

adduce evidence and dispose of the case within a

period of three months thereafter in accordance with

law.

02.09.2024 (2/2) Index : Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation : Yes / No vum

To

1.The Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

/ Special Subordinate Judge, Coimbatore.

2. The Section Officer, VR Section, Madras High Court, Chennai.

R.HEMALATHA, J.

vum

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

02.09.2024

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter