Tuesday, 19, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

M. Marimuthu vs The State Of Tamil Nadu
2024 Latest Caselaw 17172 Mad

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 17172 Mad
Judgement Date : 2 September, 2024

Madras High Court

M. Marimuthu vs The State Of Tamil Nadu on 2 September, 2024

Bench: C.V.Karthikeyan, J.Sathya Narayana Prasad

                                                                        W.A(MD) No.1462 of 2018


                           BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

                                                 Date : 02.09.2024

                                                     CORAM

                             THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.V.KARTHIKEYAN
                                                   and
                           THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE J.SATHYA NARAYANA PRASAD

                                            W.A(MD) No.1462 of 2018


                     M. Marimuthu                                                ...Appellant

                                                    Vs.

                     1. The State of Tamil Nadu
                        Rep. by the Secretary
                        Personnel and Administrative Reforms(Per.P) Department
                        Fort St. George, Chennai- 600 009.

                     2. The District Collector
                        Karur District,
                        Karur.

                     3. The Revenue Divisional Officer
                        O/o.Revenue Division Office
                        Karur.

                     4. The Employment Officer
                        Karur District, Karur                               ... Respondents



                     PRAYER: Writ Appeal filed under clause 15 of Letters Patent Act to set

                     aside orders passed in W.P. No.18484 of2018 dated 24.08.2018.

                     1/8

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                                                                                  W.A(MD) No.1462 of 2018



                                        For Petitioner     : Mr. P.V.Vetrivel
                                                             for Mr.S.Rajasekar

                                        For Respondents : Mr.Ramesh Arumugam
                                                          Government Advocate


                                                         JUDGMENT

The present Writ Appeal has been filed by the writ petitioner in

W.P. No.18484 of 2018, aggrieved by the dismissal of the writ petition

by the learned Single Judge by an order dated 24.08.2018

2. In order to facilitate easier understanding the parties would be

referred in the same nomenclature as referred in the writ petition.

3. The facts which necessitated the filing of Writ petition is that

the lands of the writ petitioner measuring about 3.11 acres in Modakkur

Village was acquired by the Special Tahsildhar (Adi Dravidar Welfare),

Kulithalai, Karur District during the year 1996- 1997 for public purpose.

The writ petitioner belongs to Hindu Arundhadhiyar Community

classified as Scheduled Caste. He was a coolie and was unable to

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

maintain his family. In the writ petition he stated that an assurance had

been held out by the Special Tahsildhar that preference would be given

by the Government for employment of his sons in government service. It

had been stated that though the petitioner has approached the government

for employment for his sons there had been no response and therefore the

writ petition has been filed in the nature of a mandamus seeking a

direction against the respondents to appoint the sons of the petitioner in

suitable posts in the service of the Government. The writ petitioner

placed reliance on G.O.Ms.No. 188 issued by the Personnel and

Administrative Reforms(Per.P) Department dated 28.12.1976. The

learned Single Judge in the course of the order had observed that the

Writ petition was the fourth time in which the petitioner had approached

this Court and therefore probably owing to frustration over the repeated

attempts seeking the same relief had dismissed the writ petition.

4. The learned counsel appearing for the appellant/writ petitioner

however would contend that the writ petitioner's land had been acquired

and that he belongs to Hindu Arundhadhiyar community/Scheduled caste

community and therefore, was of the expectation that his two sons

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

would obtain government jobs on priority basis since the family lost

their lands and they were left without any alternate. The fact that the

lands had been acquired, had been confirmed by the respondents by a

report received from the Revenue Divisional Officer, Karur .

5. We place our appreciation for the efforts of Mr. Ramesh

Arumugam, learned Government Advocate who had brought to our

notice G.O.Ms.No.122, Human Resources (K2) Development dated

02.11.2021. This Government Order has been issued on reappraisal of

G.O.Ms.No. 188 issued by Personnel and Administrative Reforms(Per.P)

Department which had been relied on by the Writ petitioner and another

G.O.Ms.No.398, Department of Personal and Administrative Reforms,

dated 13.09.1990. In G.O.Ms. 122, it had been stated that for children

who had lost their parents due to Covid, for first generation graduates,

for those who have studied education in Tamil medium, priority should

be given for them in government departments. Cyclic form of priority

was brought in and among other categories in category No.11, it had

been provided a follows:

“ Members of the family (including members of

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Scheduled Caste/Scheduled Tribes) whose lands have been acquired for Government purposes as well as for the projects of the Public Sector undertakings subjects to the condition that preference should be given to those who are dependent for their livelihood primarily or wholly on the lands acquired and from among them, to members of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes who may be eligible for employment Emphasis Supplied”.

6. The sons of the petitioner fall under such category. The

petitioner is a member of Scheduled caste community and his two sons

are not employed in government service and their lands have been

acquired for public purpose namely construction of houses for

Adidravidar community and therefore at some time in the cyclic turn of

reservation they should have got some job in the government provided

of course they applied for the same. Further instructions have been

forwarded by the learned Government Advocate who stated that the two

sons of the petitioner are quite well educated which would make them

eligible to get government jobs. The first son namely Senthilan now aged

about 42 years had studied D.Ted.,B.A.,B.Ed., and the second son

namely Anbarasan, now aged about 40 years had studied B.Sc.,

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

(Maths)MCA.,. It is however stated that they were working in private

institution. This is only natural since they cannot remain unemployed

after having educated themselves, but since their lands have been

acquired they have every right to be considered on priority basis if at all

they apply for any government job.

7. We, therefore pass the following directions:

a) If the two sons of the petitioner apply for any government

job either through TNPSC or any other approved mode including through

employment exchange and if they come within the zone of selection and

are eligible then they can be considered on priority basis for selection as

provided as per G.O.Ms.No.128 referred supra

ii) We are conscious of the fact that the first son is aged 42

years as on date and the second son is aged 40 years as on date. We are

informed that for Scheduled Caste Community though the minimum age

to be considered for employment is 40 there is a relaxation of 5 years and

therefore if the two sons of the petitioner were take up this opportunity

at the earliest they can be so considered, provided they do not cross the

outer age limit after exemption.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

8. With the above direction, the writ appeal stands disposed of. No

costs.

                                                                 (C.V.K.,J.)     (J.S.N.P,,J.)
                                                                         02.09.2024

                     Index : Yes / No
                     Internet : Yes / No
                     NCC : Yes / No
                     aav

                     To

                     1. The Secretary
                        State of Tamil Nadu

Personnel and Administrative Reforms(Per.P) Department Fort St. George, Chennai- 600 009.

2. The District Collector Karur District, Karur.

3. The Revenue Divisional Officer O/o.Revenue Division Office Karur.

4. The Employment Officer Karur District, Karur

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

C.V.KARTHIKEYAN, J.

and J.SATHYA NARAYANA PRASAD, J.

aav

02.09.2024

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter