Tuesday, 19, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

The Govt. Of Tamil Nadu vs V.Jospeh Sahayaraj
2024 Latest Caselaw 20533 Mad

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 20533 Mad
Judgement Date : 29 October, 2024

Madras High Court

The Govt. Of Tamil Nadu vs V.Jospeh Sahayaraj on 29 October, 2024

Author: R.Subramanian

Bench: R.Subramanian

                                                                          W.A.(MD) No.2161 of 2024


                          BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

                                               DATED : 29.10.2024

                                                     CORAM:

                               THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SUBRAMANIAN
                                                 and
                              THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE L.VICTORIA GOWRI

                                           W.A.(MD)No.2161 of 2024
                                                     and
                                          C.M.P.(MD) No.15212 of 2024

                 1.The Govt. of Tamil Nadu,
                   Rep. by its Additional Chief Secretary,
                   Department of School Education,
                   Fort St.George, Chennai 9.

                 2.The Director of Elementary Education,
                   DPI Campus College Road,
                   Chennai - 6.

                 3.The District Educational Officer Elementary,
                   The Office of the District Educational Officer,
                   Dindigul.

                 4.The Block Educational Officer,
                   The Office of the Block Educational Officer,
                   Athur, Office at Sempatti, Dindigul.                 ... Appellants

                                                        -vs-

                 1.V.Jospeh Sahayaraj


                 ____________
                 Page 1 of 6

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                                                                                   W.A.(MD) No.2161 of 2024


                 2.The Correspondent,
                   R.C. Middle School,
                   Ariyanallur,
                   Dindigul District - 624 303.                               ... Respondents

                           Writ Appeal filed under Clause 15 of Letters Patent to allow this Writ
                 Appeal by setting aside the order, dated 13.12.2023 made in W.P.(MD).No.29277
                 of 2023.
                                  For Appellants    : Mr.S.R.A.Ramachandran,
                                                       Addl. Government Pleader.

                                  For Respondents   : Mr.S.Savarimuthu,
                                                       For M/s.Father Xavier Associates for R1.
                                                      No appearance for R2.

                                                       JUDGMENT

[Judgment of the Court was made by R.SUBRAMANIAN, J.]

This writ appeal has been filed to help the wholly inactive officials of the

education department. All that the Writ Court has done is to direct the fourth

appellant to grant approval on being satisfied that there are no surplus teachers in

the school. Since no orders were passed within the time frame fixed by the

learned Single Judge, Cont.P.(MD)No.690 of 2024 was filed by the respondent

herein. Sensing trouble, this writ appeal has been filed only to wriggle out of the

consequences of contempt.

____________

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

2.Though this writ appeal has been presented with a delay on

15.04.2024, no action has been taken to determine as to whether there are surplus

teachers in the school or not. We will be committing a crime if we are to

entertain such appeals which will aid disobedience of the orders of this Court.

Hence, the writ appeal is dismissed. We refrain from imposing cost since we find

that the no amount of such imposition of cost will reform this particular

department namely, the education department. We make it clear that we are not

extending the time granted by the learned Single Judge for complying with his

order and if the order has not been complied within the time granted by the

learned Single Judge, the learned Single Judge will be at liberty to proceed in

contempt and pass appropriate orders. We make it clear that the salaries of the

teachers shall be paid from the date of appointment upon approval. No costs.

Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

                 NCC              : No                  [R.S.M., J.]      [L.V.G., J.]
                 Index            : No                          29.10.2024
                 ias




                 ____________


https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

To:

1.The Additional Chief Secretary, Department of School Education, Fort St.George, Chennai 9.

2.The Director of Elementary Education, DPI Campus College Road, Chennai - 6.

3.The District Educational Officer Elementary, The Office of the District Educational Officer, Dindigul.

4.The Block Educational Officer, The Office of the Block Educational Officer, Athur, Office at Sempatti, Dindigul.

____________

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

____________

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

R.SUBRAMANIAN, J.

and L.VICTORIA GOWRI, J.

ias

29.10.2024

____________

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter