Wednesday, 20, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

M/S.Thirumagal Dyeing Works vs /
2024 Latest Caselaw 21393 Mad

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 21393 Mad
Judgement Date : 11 November, 2024

Madras High Court

M/S.Thirumagal Dyeing Works vs / on 11 November, 2024

                                                                             W.P.(MD) No.15266 of 2024

                             BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

                                                 DATED: 11.11.2024

                                                     CORAM:

                                  THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.KUMARESH BABU

                                             W.P.(MD) No.15266 of 2024
                                                       and
                                       W.M.P.(MD) Nos.13383 and 13384 of 2024

                 M/S.Thirumagal Dyeing Works
                 rep. by its Partner,
                 V.A.Panneerselvam                                 ... Petitioner

                                                        /vs./


                 1.Joint Commissioner of GST and Central Excise,
                   1, Williams Road,
                   Cantonment,
                   Tiruchirappalli 620 001.

                 2.Assistant Commissioner,
                   Karur Jurisdiction, Karur
                   Erode, Tamil Nadu.                              ... Respondents

                 PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for
                 issuance of Writ of Certiorari, to call for the records of 1st respondent in Order-
                 in-Original No.16/2023-GST (DIN-20231059XN000000A7B2) dt.17.10.2023
                 and the consequential summary of the order in Form GSTR DRC-07 in
                 Ref.No.ZD330524100537Q dt.15.05.2024 issued by the 2nd respondent and

                 1/7

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                                                                               W.P.(MD) No.15266 of 2024

                 quash the order dt.17.10.2023 issued by the 1st respondent and the consequential
                 order dt.15.05.2024 issued by the 2nd respondent.

                                  For Petitioner   : Mrs.Hema Muralikrishnan

                                  For Respondents : Mr.R.Nanda Kumar
                                                        Senior Standing Counsel

                                                        ORDER

The challenge in this writ petition is to the DRC-07 notice issued by the

second respondent herein, wherein a demand had been made in respect of three

counts.

2. Heard Mrs.Hema Muralikrishnan, learned counsel for the petitioner and

Mr.R.Nanda Kumar, learned Senior Standing Counsel for the respondents.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioner had vehemently contended that the

first respondent herein pursuant to the show cause notice issued to the petitioner

and after hearing the petitioner had held that the petitioner had reversed the

wrongly availed ITC in the petitioner's GSTR-3B filed for the month of February,

2020 on 28.10.2021 and based upon the factual finding ordered that the amount

had been wrongly availed, which was reversed subsequently to be treated as

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

payment under Section 73 of the CGST Act, 2017. When that be so, the DRC-07

notice including the said amount by the second respondent is wholly erroneous

and hence, the learned counsel for the petitioner would pray this Court to set

aside the said portion of the DRC- 07 notice. With regard to the other two

documents, she would submit that the petitioner had proposed to invoke the

amnesty that had been provided by the Department.

4. Countering such argument, Mr.R.Nandakumar, learned Senior Standing

Counsel appearing for the respondents, had vehemently contended that there was

no error in including the said amount to the demand notice. Even if it is a wrong

demand, he would submit that it is for the petitioner to file an appeal against the

same and get it rectified. Further reason has also been given in the counter

affidavit filed by the second respondent that there is no provision in the portal to

enter the amount or adjust the amount which was already paid/reversed.

5. He also relied upon the various provisions of the GST Act, 2017 to

contend that there is no error in the DRC-07 notice. He had also taken me through

the various averments made in the counter affidavit filed by the second

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

respondent to sustain the impugned notice. He had also relied upon the judgment

of the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Asstt.Commr. (CT) LTU, Kakinada Vs.

Glaxo Smith Kline Consumer Health Care Ltd., reported in 2020 (36) G.S.T.L.

305 (S.C.) to contend that the writ petition itself is not maintainable.

6. I have considered the rival submissions made by the learned counsel on

either side.

7. The notice had been issued by the first respondent to the petitioner,

which has also been duly responded. Pursuant to the personal hearing that had

been granted to the petitioner, the first respondent had considered the case in

detail and had passed orders on 17.10.2023. With respect to the third item in the

demand notice, which arises out of wrong availing of ITC credit by the petitioner,

the first respondent had recorded the factual finding that the petitioner had

reversed the wrong claim even as early as on 28.02.2021 in their GSTR-3B for

the month of February, 2020.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

8. Based upon the said factual finding, the first respondent had also ordered

that the wrongly availed ITC of Rs.3,76,67,083/-, which was paid/reversed

subsequently by the petitioner in its GSTR-3B, was to be treated as payment

under Section 73 of the CGST Act, 2017. When that be so, the petitioner had been

again demanded in the DRC-07 notice to pay the said amount together with

interest. Even though the learned standing counsel had strenuously relying upon

the counter affidavit tried to sustain the DRC-07 notice, I do not find any

averment specifically sustaining the said demand.

9. In fact, in the counter affidavit, the second respondent had categorically

admitted that the petitioner had reversed the said wrongly availed ITC, however

had expressed his inability, as the portal would not permit such reversal. The said

reason given by the second respondent is wholly unacceptable. He ought not to

have included the said demand when the first respondent himself had ordered

such reversal to be treated as a payment under Section 73 of the CGST Act, 2017.

The demand in respect of the said account in item No.3 is wholly erroneous and

therefore, I am inclined to set aside the said demand under item No.3 of the

impugned DRC-07 notice. In respect of the other claims as submitted by the

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

learned counsel for the petitioner, he is at liberty to approach the concerned

Authority seeking amnesty.

10. In view of the aforesaid findings, the Writ Petition is partly allowed

setting aside the demand in respect of item No.3 of the impugned DRC-07 notice

dated 15.05.2024 and in all other aspects, the petitioner is at liberty to workout

his remedy as available in law. However, there shall be no order as to costs.

Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petitions are closed.

                 Index : Yes / No                                                 11.11.2024
                 Internet : Yes / No
                 mm






https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis




                                   K.KUMARESH BABU, J.

                                                            mm









                                                    11.11.2024




https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter