Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 21168 Mad
Judgement Date : 6 November, 2024
C.M.A.Nos.1562 & 1759 of 2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 06.11.2024
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE J.NISHA BANU
and
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R.SAKTHIVEL
C.M.A.Nos.1562 & 1759 of 2021
and
CMP.No.8136 of 2021
K.Antony Thavidu Rayan ... Appellant in both the Appeals
Vs.
K.Shiny Cladys ... Respondent in both the Appeals
Prayers: The Civil Miscellaneous Appeals are filed under Section 55 of
Divorce Act, 1869 read with Section 19 of Family Courts Act, against the fair
and final order dated 08.02.2021 made in O.P.No.5312 of 2019 and
O.P.No.137 of 2021 respectively on the file of the 5th Additional Family
Court, Chennai.
For Appellant in both the Appeals : Mr.A.V.Arun
For Respondent in both the Appeals : No appearance
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Page 1/4
C.M.A.Nos.1562 & 1759 of 2021
COMMON JUDGMENT
(Judgment of the Court was delivered by J. Nisha Banu, J)
These appeals have been filed by the appellant/husband, challenging the
common order passed by the 5th Additional Family Court, Chennai in
O.P.No.5312 of 2019 filed by the respondent/wife, granting divorce on the
ground of cruelty and to pay a sum of Rs.30 lakhs towards permanent alimony
to the respondent herein and dismissing the O.P.No.137 of 2021 filed by the
appellant herein for restitution of conjugal rights.
2. When the matter came up for hearing on 20.09.2024, there was no
representation for the respondent. Therefore, this Court directed the Registry to
send notice to the correct address of the respondent returnable by 04.10.2024.
Now, the record shows that notice has been served on the respondent on
01.10.2024.
3. Though notice was served on the respondent, there is no
representation for the respondent today. The learned counsel for the appellant
brought to the notice of this Court that the respondent/wife contracted a second
marriage and is having a child and she is settled.
4. The aforesaid submission made by the learned counsel for the
appellant is recorded.
5. Since the respondent/wife has contracted second marriage, there is no
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
C.M.A.Nos.1562 & 1759 of 2021
question of granting permanent alimony to the respondent/wife would arise.
5. Taking into consideration that the respondent is not present before this
Court and also taking into consideration, the submission made by the learned
counsel for the appellant, the order passed in O.P.No.5312 of 2019 dated
08.02.2021 directing the appellant/husband to pay a sum of Rs.30,00,000/-
towards permanent alimony to the respondent/wife alone is set aside. The
decree of divorce granted in O.P.No.5312 of 2019 dated 08.02.2021 is
confirmed. Accordingly, the Civil Miscellaneous Appeals are disposed. No
costs. Consequently connected miscellaneous petition is closed.
(J.N.B., J.) (R.S.V., J.) 06.11.2024 vsi
To
The Family Judge, Ariyalur.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
C.M.A.Nos.1562 & 1759 of 2021
J. NISHA BANU, J.
and R.SAKTHIVEL, J.
vsi
C.M.A.Nos.1562 & 1759 of 2021
06.11.2024
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!