Tuesday, 19, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Mujeep Bhasha (50 Y) vs State Rep.By
2023 Latest Caselaw 12336 Mad

Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 12336 Mad
Judgement Date : 12 September, 2023

Madras High Court
Mujeep Bhasha (50 Y) vs State Rep.By on 12 September, 2023
                                                           1 of 4

                                    IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                                                  DATED : 12.09.2023

                                                         CORAM

                                  THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N. ANAND VENKATESH

                                                Crl.O.P No.4439 of 2023

                Mujeep Bhasha (50 Y)
                S/o.Anvar Basha                                                            .. Petitioner

                                                            .Vs.
                State rep.by
                The Inspector of Police
                All Women Police Station
                Ammapet, Salem.                                                         ... Respondent
                (Cr.No.63 of 2021)


                PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal
                Procedure, to aside the condition imposed by an order dated 07.01.2022 passed in
                CMP.No.95 of 2022 on the file of the Principal Sessions Judge, Salem, the petitioner
                shall deposit the passport before the respondent and produce the receipt before the
                learned Judicial Magistrate, Additional Mahila Court, Salem while producing the
                sureties consequently directing the respondents to return the passport of the
                petitioner within a stipulated period of time.


                                        For Petitioner      : Mr.R.Ezhilarasan

                                        For Respondent      : Mr.A.Gopinath
                                                              Government Advocate (Crl.side)


                                                           ORDER

This Criminal Original Petition has been filed challenging one of the condition

imposed by the Court below in CMP.No.95 of 2022 dated 7.1.2022 while enlarging

the petitioner on bail.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 2 of 4

2.Heard Mr.R.Ezhilarasan, learned counsel for the petitioner and

Mr.A.Gopinath, learned Government Advocate (Crl.side) for the respondent.

3.The petitioner is aggrieved by the following condition imposed by the Court

below:

4.that the petitioner shall deposit the Passport before the

respondent police and produce the receipt before the learned

Judicial Magistrate, Additional Mahila Court, Salem while

producing sureties;

4.The learned Government Advocate (Crl.side) on instructions submitted that

the investigation was completed and final report was filed before the Court below

and the same was taken on file in C.C.No.377 of 2022. The learned Government

Advocate (Crl.side) further submitted that the case is now at the stage of trial and

LW.1 was examined on 01.9.2023 and the case stands posted for hearing on

9.10.2023.

5.In the light of the above development, it will suffice if a direction is given to

the Court below to complete the proceedings within a time frame. It will also be

appropriate to direct the respondent to deposit the Passport that has been collected

from the petitioner before the Court below.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 3 of 4

6.In the result, this criminal original petition is disposed of with a direction to

the respondent to deposit the Passport that was handed over by the petitioner

before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Additional Mahila Court, Salem, within a

period of two weeks from the date of receipt of copy of the order. The Court below

shall also dispose of C.C.No.377 of 2022, within a period of three months from the

date of receipt of copy of this order. The trial shall be conducted on a day to day

basis in accordance with the guidelines given by Hon'ble Supreme Court reported in

Vinod Kumar .Vs. State of Punjab [2015 (1) MLJ (Crl) 288 SC]. If the petitioner

adopts any dilatory tactics, it is open to the trial Court to insist upon the presence

of the petitioner and remand him to custody as per the judgment of the Hon'ble

Supreme Court in STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH VS. SHAMBHU NATH SINGH (JT 2001

(4) SC 3191).





                                                                                               12.09.2023

                Index       : Yes/No
                Internet    : Yes/No
                Speaking Order/Non-Speaking Order
                KP


                To

                1.The Inspector of Police
                 All Women Police Station
                 Ammapet, Salem.

                2. Judicial Magistrate
                   Additional Mahila Court, Salem.

                3.The Public Prosecutor
                  High Court, Madras.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                                  4 of 4

                                           N. ANAND VENKATESH,. J.
                                                               kp




                                            Crl.O.P No.4439 of 2023




                                                        12.09.2023




https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter