Tuesday, 19, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Oa/30/2020/Tm/Chn & ... vs Senior Examiner Of Trade Marks
2023 Latest Caselaw 12208 Mad

Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 12208 Mad
Judgement Date : 11 September, 2023

Madras High Court
Oa/30/2020/Tm/Chn & ... vs Senior Examiner Of Trade Marks on 11 September, 2023
    2023:MHC:4113



                                                                    (T)CMA(TM) Nos.159 & 179 of 2023


                                  IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                                                DATED: 11.09.2023

                                                    CORAM

                  THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY

                                         (T)CMA(TM) Nos.159 & 179 of 2023
                                   [OA/30/2020/TM/CHN & (T)SR.No.8/2020/TM/CH]


                  Jawan Guarding Services Private Limited,
                  H.No.3/1/2/3/UAGF, Bolarum Road,
                  Lothukunta, Secundarabad, Rangereddi,
                  Telangana – 500 015, India.                                  ... Appellant
                                                                               in both appeals

                                                       Vs.

                  Senior Examiner of Trade Marks,
                  Intellectual Property Office,
                  Intellectual Property Office Building,
                  G.S.T. Road,
                  Guindy, Chennai – 600 032,
                  Tamil Nadu, India.                                          ... Respondent
                                                                                 in both appeals

                  Common Prayer: Transfer Civil Miscellaneous Appeals (Trademarks) filed
                  under Section 91 of the Trade Marks Act, 1999, praying that the orders
                  dated 28.08.2018 and 19.08.2019 respectively of the Hon'ble Senior
                  Examiner of Trade Marks in Application Numbers 4003432 and 4003431
                  respectively in Class 45 and Class 35 respectively, be dismissed and the
                  subject Trade Mark be allowed to proceed to registration.


https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                  Page 1 of 6
                                                                     (T)CMA(TM) Nos.159 & 179 of 2023




                                   For Appellant    :     Mr.B. Karthik

                                   For Respondent   :     Mr.S. Janarthanam
                                                          Senior Panel Counsel



                                              COMMON JUDGMENT


                            Both these appeals were filed by Jawan Guarding Services Private

                  Limited.        In (T)CMA(TM) No.159 of 2023, an order dated 28.08.2018

                  rejecting Application Number 4003432 is assailed and in (T)CMA(TM)

                  No.179 of 2023, an order dated 19.08.2019 rejecting Application Number

                  4003431 is assailed.       Both the applications are for registration of the

                  following device mark




                  in Class 45 and 35, respectively.



                            2. Learned counsel for the appellant submitted that the predecessor-

                  in-interest of the appellant was a partnership firm constituted under the

                  name and style of ' M/s.Javan Services' on 12.06.2012.         Subsequently, a


https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                  Page 2 of 6
                                                                    (T)CMA(TM) Nos.159 & 179 of 2023


                  private limited company under the name and style of 'Jawan Guarding

                  Services Private Limited' was formed on 03.03.2014 and the applications for

                  registration of the device mark were filed on 21.11.2018. Learned counsel

                  pointed out that evidence of use of the device mark was provided in the form

                  of invoices issued by the appellant from the year 2016 onwards. In response

                  to the applications, in the examination report, learned counsel pointed out

                  that an objection was raised under Section 9(1)(b) of the Trade Marks Act,

                  1999 (the Trade Marks Act). In response thereto, learned counsel stated that

                  a reply was issued stating that the mark is a device mark and that such mark

                  consists of three components. The first component in the device being the

                  emblem within which a man's face is drawn in maroon and white colours

                  against a blue background; the second component being the three words

                  'JAWAN GUARDING SERVICES' written in blue colour; and the third

                  component comprising the two words 'Customized Vigilance' written in

                  maroon colour below the words 'JAWAN GUARDING SERVICES'. When

                  considered as a whole, learned counsel contended that the mark is inherently

                  distinctive and, in any event, acquired distinctiveness through use.




https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                  Page 3 of 6
                                                                      (T)CMA(TM) Nos.159 & 179 of 2023


                            3. Submissions to the contrary were made by Mr.S. Janarthanam,

                  learned Senior Panel Counsel. He pointed out that the device mark is used

                  in relation to the provision of security services. Consequently, the mark is

                  clearly distinctive of the nature of services provided by the appellant. Since

                  such distinctive mark fall within the scope of Section 9(1)(b) of the Trade

                  Marks Act, he submitted that no interference is warranted with the

                  impugned order.



                            4. Apart from referring to Section 9(1)(b) of the Trade Marks Act, the

                  impugned order contains no reasons. The grounds of decision contain the

                  conclusion that the mark consists exclusively of words which may serve in

                  trade to designate the intended purpose of the services. Apart from the said

                  conclusion, even the grounds of decision do not engage with the response of

                  the appellant to the examination report and the statements therein that the

                  mark is a device mark consisting of three components which, when viewed

                  as a whole, make the mark distinctive. Evidence of use of the mark by the

                  appellant prior to the application was also disregarded.           For all these

                  reasons, the orders impugned in these two appeals are unsustainable and are,

                  hereby, set aside.


https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                  Page 4 of 6
                                                                       (T)CMA(TM) Nos.159 & 179 of 2023




                            5. By taking into account the fact that the appellant's mark is a device

                  mark consisting of about three components and by taking into account the

                  evidence of use, I am inclined to direct that the mark be accepted for

                  advertisement. This will, however, be subject to the limitation that the

                  appellant claims no exclusive right over the words 'Jawan', 'Guarding' or

                  'Services', when used separately. This order shall not, however, be binding

                  on opponents, if any. Both the appeals are allowed on the above terms.



                                                                                         11.09.2023

                  Index: Yes
                  Speaking Order
                  Internet: Yes
                  Neutral Citation: Yes

                  Sni


                  To

                  Senior Examiner of Trade Marks,
                  Intellectual Property Office,
                  Intellectual Property Office Building,
                  G.S.T. Road,
                  Guindy, Chennai – 600 032,
                  Tamil Nadu, India.



https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                  Page 5 of 6
                                              (T)CMA(TM) Nos.159 & 179 of 2023


                                  SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY,J.

Sni

(T)CMA(TM) Nos.159 & 179 of 2023

11.09.2023

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter