Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 12131 Mad
Judgement Date : 8 September, 2023
C.R.P(MD)No.259 of 2018
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED :08.09.2023
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.VIJAYAKUMAR
C.R.P.(NPD)(MD)No.259 of 2018
and
C.M.P.(MD)No.1157 of 2018
K.S.Thirumalaisamy Reddiyar ... Petitioner
-vs-
1.Malarvizhi
2.Abdul Jabbar
Chithra (died)
3.Ayyappan
4.Meera
5.Karthik @ Ram Mohan
6.Premchand ... Respondents
PRAYER: Civil Revision Petitions are filed under Article 227 of the
Constitution of India to set aside the order dated 10.01.2017 passed by the
Additional Sub Court, Thanjavur in E.A.No.81 of 2016 in E.P.No.158 of
2010 in O.S.No.87 of 1997.
For Petitioner : Mr.A.Senthil Kumar
For Respondents : No Appearance
1/5
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
C.R.P(MD)No.259 of 2018
ORDER
The present revision petition has been filed by the decree holder in a
suit for specific performance in O.S.No.87 of 1997 on the file of the
Additional Sub Court, Thanjavur.
2.On the strength of the specific performance decree, the revision
petitioner had filed E.P.No.158 of 2010 for execution of a sale deed. When
the said application was pending, one of the judgment debtors namely,
Chithra had passed away and her legal heirs, viz., her husband,
Ramamoorthy, son Ayyappan, daughters Meera and Malarvizhi were
impleaded.
3.While so, one of the legal legal heirs of Chithra, namely
Ramamoorthy has passed away. Thereafter, daughter of Chithra, namely
Malarvizhi had filed E.A.No.81 of 2016 to implead two third parties namely
Karthick @ Ram Mohan and Premchand on the ground that her father had
an illicit relationship with one Premavathi, through whom the proposed
parties were born. In the interest of justice, she sought to implead them.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis C.R.P(MD)No.259 of 2018
4.The revision petitioners /decree holders strongly opposed the said
application on the ground that they are not the necessary parties and the
application has been filed only to drag on the proceedings.
5.The trial Court after considering the submissions on either side had
allowed the said application on the ground that in memorandum of appeal
grounds in A.S.No.53 of 2003 on the file of the Additional District Court,
Thanjavur, the proposed parties were impleaded as legal heirs of the
deceased Ramamoorthy.
6.I have carefully considered the submissions on either side and
perused the material records.
7.One of the judgment debtors, namely Chithra had passed away and
after her death, her husband, two daughters and her son have been
impleaded. Even assuming that Karthik @ Ram Mohan and Premchand are
the legal heirs of Padmavathi, they can never become legal heirs of the
deceased Chithra. Therefore, the trial Court was not right in allowing the
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis C.R.P(MD)No.259 of 2018
impleading application. Therefore, the order impugned in the revision
petition is set aside and this Civil Revision Petition is allowed. The
Execution Court is directed to dispose of the execution proceedings on or
before 31.12.2023. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous
petition is closed.
08.09.2023
NCC : Yes / No
Index : Yes / No
Internet : Yes
ta
To
The Additional Sub Court,
Thanjavur.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
C.R.P(MD)No.259 of 2018
R.VIJAYAKUMAR,J.
ta
C.R.P.(NPD)(MD)No.259 of 2018
08.09.2023
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!