Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 11861 Mad
Judgement Date : 5 September, 2023
C.R.P. No. 3218 of 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED :05.09.2023
CORAM :
THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE V.BHAVANI SUBBAROYAN
C.R.P. No. 3218 of 2023
and
C.M.P.No.19847 of 2023
V. ManojKumar ...Petitioner
.Vs.
1. V.S. Arumugam
2. V.S. Kulandai Velusamy
3. V.P.Vellingirinathan
4.V.M. Vijayalakshmi
5. The Tahsildar,
Perur Taluk, Perur
Coimbatore. ...Respondents
Prayer: This Civil Revision Petition is filed under Article 227 of the
Constitution of India praying to set aside the order passed in I.A.No.8 of
2023 in O.S.No.928 of 2015 on the file of the I Additional District Munsif
Coimbatore dated 14.07.2023 and pass orders.
1/6
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
C.R.P. No. 3218 of 2023
For Petitioner : Mr. P. Chandrasekar
For Respondent :Mr.K. Govi Ganesan counsel for Cavetor
ORDER
This petition is filed to set aside the order passed in I.A.No.8 of
2023 in O.S.No.928 of 2015 on the file of the I Additional District Munsif
Coimbatore dated 14.07.2023
2. The facts of the case is that the first and second respondents
herein have filed the suit in O.S.No.928 of 2015 before the I Additional
District Munsif Court, Coimbatore praying to demarcate the subject property
and for permanent injunction restraining the defendants 2 and 3 their men
agents and other persons claiming rights through them from trespassing into
the suit property or interfering with the plaintiffs peaceful possession and
enjoyment of the suit property. Pending suit, the mother of the petitioner
herein transferred the property to the petitioner herein due to which I.A.No.5
of 2023 was filed to amend the cause title and accordingly the petitioner was
arrayed as 5th defendant in the suit, whereas the first and respondents who
are adjacent land owners have executed partition deed and the same was not
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis C.R.P. No. 3218 of 2023
disclosed in the suit. It is pertinent to note that once the partition was
effected between the parties they lose their right to continue in the suit
proceedings in the capacity of owner of the schedule mentioned property.
However, the first and respondents mislead the Court by disclosing the
partition took place between them. Furthermore the first and second
respondents filed a memo before the Trial Court on 02.01.2023 stating that
the first respondent may be removed and the second respondent may be
allowed to continue the case, but they have not stated the reason for which
the first respondent should be removed from the case. Therefore, the
petitioner filed I.A.No.8 of 2023 in O.S.No.928 of 2023 under Order 7 Rule
11 read with Section 151 of CPC to reject he plaint as it is not maintainable
under provisions of CPC and also the suit is not having cause of action.
However, the I.A.No.8 of 2023 in O.S.No.928 of 2023 was dismissed vide
order dated 14.07.2023. Hence ,this petition.
3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the first
and second respondents herein have concealed about the partition deed and
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis C.R.P. No. 3218 of 2023
pretended themselves as the owner of the subject property which is the clear
abuse of process of law and the same has not taken cognizance by the Court
below while passing the impugned order. Hence prays to allow this petition.
4. The learned counsel for the respondents submitted that the suit
is of the year 2015 and the petitioner herein with an intention to delay the
Judgment in the suit has filed the I.A. He further submitted that there is no
maintainability in the I.A filed by the petitioners. Hence he prays to dismiss
this petition.
5. Heard both sides and perused the materials available on record.
6. On a perusal of the records it is seen that the subject property is
a ancestral one and the suit is of the year 2015. After filing of the suit the
subsequent events happened during pendency of the suit i.e the Registered
settlement Deed executed in favour of the petitioner/5th defendant by his
mother and the partition took place between the first and respondents are
subject to the facts of the case. Due to the above events, there will be some
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis C.R.P. No. 3218 of 2023
obstacles in demarcating the subject property among the parties concerned.
Hence the learned Judge is hereby directed to take steps for demarcating the
subject property in the manner known to law before passing orders in the
suit.
7. In view of the above, the learned Judge,Additional District
Munsif Coimbatore is directed to complete the trial and dispose of the suit
in O.S.No.928 of 2015 on or before 29.12.2023, without giving
unnecessary adjournments. No order as to costs. Consequently, the
connected miscellaneous petition is closed.
05.09.2023
smn Index : Yes/No Internet: Yes/No
To.
1. The I Additional District Munsif Coimbatore
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis C.R.P. No. 3218 of 2023
V.BHAVANI SUBBAROYAN,J.
Smn
C.R.P. No. 3218 of 2023 and C.M.P.No.19847 of 2023
05.09.2023
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!