Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 15459 Mad
Judgement Date : 30 November, 2023
W.A.(MD)No.1456 of 2022
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED : 30.11.2023
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.SANJAY V.GANGAPURWALA, CHIEF JUSTICE
and
THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE L.VICTORIA GOWRI
W.A.(MD)No.1456 of 2022
K.Amala Devi ... Appellant
-vs-
1.The Director,
Directorate of School Education,
D.P.I. Campus,
College Road,
Chennai – 6.
2.The Joint Director (Higher Secondary),
D.P.I. Campus,
College Road,
Chennai – 6.
3.The Chief Educational Officer,
Kokkirakulam,
Collectorate Campus,
Tirunelveli District. ... Respondents
PRAYER: Writ Appeal filed under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent,
against the order dated 28.10.2022, made in W.P.(MD)No.15448 of 2021.
____________
Page 1 of 5
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
W.A.(MD)No.1456 of 2022
For Appellant : Mr.S.Louis
For Respondents : Mr.D.Sadiq Raja
Additional Government Pleader
JUDGMENT
[Delivered by the Hon'ble CHIEF JUSTICE]
We have heard Mr.S.Louis, learned counsel for the appellant and
Mr.D.Sadiq Raja, learned Additional Government Pleader for the respondents.
2. The appellant has filed Writ Petition before the learned Single Judge
to fix her seniority. The juniors of the appellant were promoted in the year
2018, whereas, the appellant was promoted on 21.10.2020.
3. The learned counsel for the appellant submits that the Department
did not disclose about the vacant posts available in the same District. It is
because, the appellant was required to go to other place, she declined
promotion in the year 2018. Two juniors of the appellant were promoted in
the year 2018 and they came back to their parent Districts within five months.
The posts in the same District were available in the year 2018 also and the
same was not disclosed. The said aspect ought to have been considered.
____________
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
4. We have considered the submissions canvassed by the learned
counsels on either side and also gone through the order passed by the learned
Single Judge.
5. We do not find any error committed by the learned Single while
passing the impugned order. The factual matrix has been considered by the
learned Single Judge threadbare. The appellant was promoted in the year
2018, but had declined, as she did not want to leave the District.
6. In the light of the above, no case is made out for interference. The
Writ Appeal stands disposed of. No costs.
[S.V.G., .C.J.] [L.V.G., J.]
30.11.2023
Index : Yes / No
Neutral Citation : Yes / No
smn2
____________
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
To
1.The Director, Directorate of School Education, D.P.I. Campus, College Road, Chennai – 6.
2.The Joint Director (Higher Secondary), D.P.I. Campus, College Road, Chennai – 6.
3.The Chief Educational Officer, Kokkirakulam, Collectorate Campus, Tirunelveli District.
____________
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
THE HONOURABLE CHIEF JUSTICE and L.VICTORIA GOWRI, J.
smn2
30.11.2023
____________
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!