Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 15457 Mad
Judgement Date : 30 November, 2023
W.P.No.24075 of 2011
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 30.11.2023
CORAM :
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY
W.P.No.24075 of 2011
C.H.Buchaiah .. Petitioner
Versus
1. Chief Educational Officer,
Chennai.
2. District Educational Officer,
South Chennai,
Chennai - 8.
3. Headmaster,
Kesari Higher Secondary School,
T.Nagar, Chennai - 17. .. Respondents
Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India,
pleased to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records
relating to the order passed in Na.Ka.No.4491/ A2 / 11, dated 25.07.2011
passed by the 2nd respondent and quash the same and direct the respondents
to sanction the incentive increment for M.Phil qualification to the petitioner.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
1/4
W.P.No.24075 of 2011
For Petitioner : Mr.S.Thendral
for M/s.C.S.Associates
For Respondents : Mr.T.K.Saravanan,
Government Advocate
for RR-1 and 2
: R3 - No Appearance
ORDER
This petition is filed with a grievance that the petitioner was not
granted third incentive for completion of M.Phil Degree.
2. The issue has now been settled by this Court by the Hon'ble Full
Bench by the judgment, dated 29.04.2022 in W.A.Nos.3674 of 2019 etc.,
(batch cases). The operative portion reads thus :-
" 13. In the light of the above, we are of the considered opinion that the view taken by the Division Bench in W.A.No.1664 of 2016 dated 29.06.2018 (The Director of School Education and others v. V.Dhanapal) that a teacher shall be granted only with two incentive increments, equivalent to four advance increments, for the entire period of his/her service, holds good and the view taken by the Division Bench in W.A.(MD) Nos.701 and 769 of 2015 etc., dated 15.07.2015 (The Director of School Education and others v. S.Amalraj) and the view taken by another Division Bench in W.A.(MD) No.867 of 2014 dated 18.09.2014 (The Director of School Education and another v. N.Balasoundari and another) that a teacher is entitled to the third set of incentive increment, cannot be said to be a good law. We answer the reference accordingly.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Registry is directed to post the matters before the appropriate roster Bench for disposal of the respective cases on merit."
3. In view thereof, the petitioner is not entitled for the prayer in the
Writ Petition and this Writ Petition is dismissed. No costs.
30.11.2023
Index : yes
Speaking order
Neutral Citation : no
grs
To
1. The Chief Educational Officer, Chennai.
2. The District Educational Officer, South Chennai, Chennai - 8.
3. The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY, J.
grs
30.11.2023
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!