Tuesday, 19, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Unknown vs A.Abdul Kalam Azad
2023 Latest Caselaw 15362 Mad

Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 15362 Mad
Judgement Date : 30 November, 2023

Madras High Court

Unknown vs A.Abdul Kalam Azad on 30 November, 2023

Author: S.M.Subramaniam

Bench: S.M.Subramaniam

                                                                W.A.(MD).Nos.63 of 2023 and etc., batch


                              BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

                                        Reserved on      06.11.2023
                                       Pronounced on     30.11.2023

                                                       CORAM:

                                  THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM
                                                         and
                                   THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE R.KALAIMATHI


                       W.A.(MD)Nos.63 of 2023, 30 of 2023, 31 of 2023, 319 of 2023, 117 of
                     2023, 1530 of 2022, 155 of 2023, 157 of 2023, 156 of 2023, 1118 of 2022,
                       32 of 2023, 33 of 2023, 49 of 2023, 60 of 2023, 62 of 2023, 97 of 2023,
                          98 of 2023, 158 of 2023, 165 of 2023, 245 of 2023 and 313 of 2023
                                                         and
                      C.M.P.(MD).Nos.2096 of 2023, 2109 of 2023, 2094 of 2023, 360 of 2023,
                     362 of 2023, 3567 of 2023, 364 of 2023, 366 of 2023, 1098 of 2023, 3007
                      of 2023, 12877 of 2022, 1408 of 2023, 1410 of 2023, 1513 of 2023, 2088
                         of 2023, 3533 of 2023, 498 of 2023, 682 of 2023, 685 of 2023, 690 of
                                          2023, 8863 of 2022 and 2149 of 2023


                     W.A.(MD)No.63 of 2023

                     1.The Commissioner,
                       Tirunelveli Corporation,
                       Tirunelveli District,
                       Tirunelveli.




                     Page 1 of 11


https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                                                                   W.A.(MD).Nos.63 of 2023 and etc., batch




                     2.The Assistant Commissioner,
                       Melapalayam Zone,
                       Tirunelveli Corporation,
                       Tirunelveli District,
                       Tirunelveli.                                                   ... Appellants
                                                            Vs.
                     A.Abdul Kalam Azad                                               ... Respondent


                     PRAYER: Writ Appeal is filed under Clause 15 of Letter Patent, against the
                     order of this Court dated 14.07.2022 in W.P.(MD).No.10427 of 2022.


                                       For Appellants   : Mr.Veera Kathiravan
                                                         Additional Advocate General
                                                         assisted by Mr.S.P.Maharajan
                                                         Special Government Pleader


                                       For Respondent    : Mr.M.Vallinayagam, Senior counsel
                                                          for Mr.T.Sakthikumaran



                                               COMMON JUDGMENT

[Judgment of the Court was made by R.KALAIMATHI,J.]

The Commissioner of Tirunelveli Corporation and the Assistant

Commissioner of Melapalayam Zone of Tirunelveli Corporation have

preferred these writ appeals against the orders passed in W.P.(MD).Nos.

10427, 10467, 10413, 10465, 10425, 10394, 10450, 10408, 10461, 10396,

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.A.(MD).Nos.63 of 2023 and etc., batch

10479, 10462, 10388, 10389, 10429, 10474, 10390, 10424, 10466, 10456

and 10391 of 2022, dated 14.07.2022.

2. As the issues to be determined in these writ appeals are similar in

nature, we have heard the matters together and they are disposed of by

this common judgment.

3. The writ petitions were filed by the respondents praying to call for

the records relating to the eviction order published through public notice

dated 18.05.2022, passed by the Commissioner of Tirunelveli Corporation,

published in the daily newspaper in Dinamani on 18.05.2022 and to quash

the same as illegal and consequently, to give a direction to the present

appellants to allow the respondents to continue the lease of shops they had

in occupation up to the year 2025 by duly collecting the rent already fixed in

accordance with law.

4. The learned Additional Advocate General Mr.Veera Kathiravan

assisted by the learned Special Government Pleader Mr.S.P.Maharajan,

appearing for the appellants would contend that G.O.(Ms.)No.92 reads that

the lease can be renewed for two consecutive 3 years period and the said

G.O. stipulates that the lease can be further extended for a period of three

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.A.(MD).Nos.63 of 2023 and etc., batch

years and for further block period of nine years, based on the rent to be

fixed on the basis of market value prevailing on the particular date and if it

is not accepted by the lessee / licensee, they can go for public auction. He

would also drew the attention of this Court that as per G.O.(Ms.)No.92,

Municipal Administration and Water Supply Department dated 03.07.2007,

every three years there must be an enhancement of 15% of the existing

lease amount fare. The total block period is nine years, which ended on

02.07.2016.

5. The learned Additional Advocate General would also submit that

out of 130 existing leaseholders, 94 of them have agreed for enhanced

monthly rent of Rs.225/- per sq.ft. fixed by the Corporation and continue to

pay the enhanced rent and 33 lessees did not have interest to pay the

revised rent. Therefore, as the lessees have failed to pay the revised rent

continuously for three months, their licences were cancelled and the public

notice was issued to that effect.

6. Mr.M.Vallinayagam, learned Senior counsel appearing for

Mr.T.Sakthi Kumaran, learned counsel for the respondents, would

vehemently argue that the Corporation has extended the lease period of

the respondents' shops for a period of 9 years from 18.07.2016 to

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.A.(MD).Nos.63 of 2023 and etc., batch

18.07.2025 and the rents were being paid to the Corporation without

default in payment. The impugned eviction order was passed without

issuing any show cause notice, which is against the principles of natural

justice. It is his further argument that the Corporation wanted to revise the

rent by fixing Rs.225/- per sq.ft., for the old shopkeepers on par with new

shopkeepers, which is not correct. The eviction order was published only in

the daily newspaper by way of paper publication.

7. Heard the arguments of the learned Additional Advocate General

Mr.Veera Kathiravan appearing for the appellants / Tirunelveli Corporation

and Mr.M.Vallinayagam, learned Senior counsel appearing for the

respondents.

8. The writ petitioners claim that the first respondent leased the

shops belonging to Tirunelveli Corporation by collecting a sum (varies) as

rental advance and security deposit for three years from 2007 by allotment

order. The rental amount was fixed at the time of allotment of the shops

and the petitioners are running business in the said shops.

9. It was contended that the said lease period was extended every

three years to till date by enhancing the rent at 15% for every nine years as

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.A.(MD).Nos.63 of 2023 and etc., batch

per the norms in vogue and the petitioners are paying the revised rent

including G.S.T. on or before 10th of every month without any default. The

respondents, as per the proceedings in Na.Ka.No.A1-1305-2015, extended

the lease period for further nine years on 18.07.2016 (i.e., till 18.07.2025),

by collecting the renewal fee of Rs.1,000/- and the petitioners further claim

that on 21.08.2020, the first respondent, by his proceedings in Na.Ka.No.

6526/2015/E1, issued a Circular to the shopkeepers Sangam demanding

them to co-operate for the new construction of shops on the Northern and

Western side of the bus stand next to the existing shops under the Smart

City Scheme.

10. It was further contended that all of a sudden, the first respondent,

without any prior show cause notice, passed an eviction order through

public notice in Dinamani and Dinakaran daily newspapers on 18.05.2022,

based on the proceedings of the first respondent in nt.M.vz;.

114/2022/nrknjhm/jpyp ehs; 17.05.2022. The said notice is extracted

hereunder:-

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.A.(MD).Nos.63 of 2023 and etc., batch

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.A.(MD).Nos.63 of 2023 and etc., batch

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.A.(MD).Nos.63 of 2023 and etc., batch

11. It appears that as per the Smart City Scheme, an amount of Rs.

39,00,00,000/- was allocated for constructing two additional bus stop

platforms, 60 new shops, multi level car parking, theme park were planned

and they were constructed. In the bus stand, there are 130 shops in the

old building. The market rent was fixed at Rs.225/- per sq.ft. and out of 130

shops, 97 existing leaseholders accepted the enhanced monthly rent and

occupied the shops and the remaining 33 lessees filed these writ petitions

to quash the public notice stating that the revised rent would apply for the

new shops as well as the old shops, which is not correct and for want of

show cause notice, the public notice viz., the eviction order to be quashed.

12. Admittedly, the respondents were lessees in occupation of

premises for several years by paying monthly rents to the first appellant

herein. The Municipal Corporation is under obligation to implement various

schemes and to provide facilities, for which it needs huge amount and the

same can be augmented only, by collecting licence fee, rent, tax etc. For

effective public administration, the Authority should strive for same and

shall make all possible endeavour to augment revenue in order to do better

facilities for the welfare of the public. More so, it is the constitutional

mandate. To achieve economic status to greater heights, constant

endeavour in this regard is expected. In order to undo the inequals,

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.A.(MD).Nos.63 of 2023 and etc., batch

implementing of more welfare activities are expected. The respondents

hitherto enjoyed the concession extended to them. The learned Additional

Advocate General would submit that similar writ appeals were ordered

bearing in mind about the public importance and it was also confirmed by

the Hon'ble Supreme Court.

13. Based on the aforesaid discussions, these Writ Appeals are

allowed and the order impugned dated 14.07.2022 in W.P.(MD) Nos.10427,

10467, 10413, 10465, 10425, 10394, 10450, 10408, 10461, 10396, 10479,

10462, 10388, 10389, 10429, 10474, 10390, 10424, 10466, 10456 and

10391 of 2022 are set aside. However, the respondents are at liberty to

submit an application for renewal of the lease, accepting the rate of Rs.

225/- per square feet on or before 15th December, 2023, failing which the

appellants are directed to proceed to evict the respondents and conduct

public auction by following the procedures as contemplated. In respect of

the unoccupied shops, the appellants shall conduct open public auction.

No costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petitions are closed.




                                                                [S.M.S.,J.] & [R.K.M.,J.]
                                                                      30.11.2023
                     NCC               : Yes/No
                     Index              : Yes/No
                     Internet           : Yes/No




https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                                                                    W.A.(MD).Nos.63 of 2023 and etc., batch




                                                                             S.M.SUBRAMANIAM,J.
                                                                                                      and
                                                                                    R.KALAIMATHI,J.

                                                                                                      akv




                                                                   Pre. delivery judgment made in

W.A.(MD)Nos.63 of 2023, 30 of 2023, 31 of 2023, 319 of 2023, 117 of 2023, 1530 of 2022, 155 of 2023, 157 of 2023, 156 of 2023, 1118 of 2022, 32 of 2023, 33 of 2023, 49 of 2023, 60 of 2023, 62 of 2023, 97 of 2023, 98 of 2023, 158 of 2023, 165 of 2023, 245 of 2023 and 313 of 2023

30.11.2023

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter