Monday, 18, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Chandran vs /
2023 Latest Caselaw 14838 Mad

Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 14838 Mad
Judgement Date : 24 November, 2023

Madras High Court

Chandran vs / on 24 November, 2023

Author: S.Srimathy

Bench: S.Srimathy

                                                                  S.A.(MD).NoS.367 AND 368 of 2018

                                  THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

                                                 DATED: 24.11.2023

                                                     CORAM:

                                   THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE S.SRIMATHY

                                         S.A.(MD).Nos.367 and 368 of 2018
                                                       and
                                           C.M.P.(MD)No.10331 of 2018



                     1.Chandran

                     2.Banumathi                          ... Appellants in both S.As.,

                                                       /Vs./


                     1.Minnalkodi

                     2.Rajammal

                     3.Kodai

                     4.Geetha alias Thailammai

                     5.Saraswathy

                     6.Chelladurai                              ...Respondents in both S.As.,




                     1/6
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                                                                          S.A.(MD).NoS.367 AND 368 of 2018

                     COMMON PRAYER: Second Appeals filed under Section 100 of the
                     Civil Procedure Code against the Judgment and Decree dated 27.04.2018
                     in A.S.Nos.41 and 25/2014 on the file of the Subordinate Judge,
                     Paramakudi, in reversing the judgment and decree dated 09.12.2013 in
                     O.S.No.93/2010 on the file of District Munsif, Paramakudi.


                                     For Appellants

                                     in both S.As.,     : Mr.S.Ramesh


                                     For R1 to R5

                                      in both S.As.,   : Mr.S.Rajasekar


                                     For R6             : No appearance



                                                    COMMON JUDGMENT



The plaintiffs and the first defendant are the children of Govindhan

Pillai. The plaintiffs are the daughters and the first defendant is the son.

The third defendant is the subsequent purchaser from the first defendant.

The second defendant is the husband of the third defendant. Hence, the

defendants 2 and 3 are subsequent purchasers through the first defendant.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis S.A.(MD).NoS.367 AND 368 of 2018

For the sake of convenience, the parties shall be referred as Plaintiff and

Defendants based on the ranking in the suit.

2. The daughters have filed the suit for partition to divide 11 items

belonging to the family. The suit was decreed allotting 5/12 share to the

daughters. Aggrieved over the same, the defendants 2 and 3, the

subsequent purchasers had filed the first appeal and the daughters had

preferred cross appeal before the First Appellate Court, wherein the First

Appellate Court had rendered a reversed judgment and granted equal

share to all the 6 children of Govindhan Pillai, allotting 5/6 share to the

daughters and 1/6th share to the son. Aggrieved over the same the present

second appeal is filed by the defendants 2 and 3.

3. The contention of the defendants 2 and 3 is that the 1st item of the

suit property was already sold to them on 24.01.2007 and subsequent to

the sale only the suit for partition is filed on 12.07.2010. Since the sale of

the 1st item of the suit property is prior to the partition, the sale is

genuine and the third defendant is the bona fide purchaser. But both the

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis S.A.(MD).NoS.367 AND 368 of 2018

Courts without taking the fact of sale prior to suit, have come to the

conclusion that the 1st item of suit property is available for partition,

which is erroneous and hence prayed to modify the judgment as far as 1st

item is concerned.

4. After hearing the arguments this Court had given its anxious

consideration. The 1st defendant before selling the property ought to have

disclosed that he has five siblings and their interest in involved in the suit

property. Since the same was not disclosed then the defendants 2 and 3

ought to be considered as bonafide purchasers and their rights ought to

be protected.

5. The second appeal is preferred against the preliminary decree.

While considering final decree the Courts below shall protect the rights

of the bonafide purchasers and divide the shares accordingly.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis S.A.(MD).NoS.367 AND 368 of 2018

6. For the aforesaid reasons, these Second Appeals are disposed of

with the direction stated supra, confirming the judgment and decree dated

27.04.2018 in A.S.Nos.41 and 25 of 2014 on the file of the learned

Subordinate Judge, Paramakudi. No costs. Consequently, connected

Miscellaneous Petition is closed.





                                                                                          24.11.2023
                     Index          : Yes / No
                     NCC           : Yes / No

                     mm

                     TO:

                     1.The Subordinate Judge, Paramkudi,

                     2.The District Munsif, Paramakudi.

                     3.The Section Officer,
                       VR Section,
                       Madurai Bench of Madras High Court,
                       Madurai.





https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                                         S.A.(MD).NoS.367 AND 368 of 2018



                                                   S.SRIMATHY, J.

                                                                    mm




                                         Common Judgment made in
                                  S.A.(MD).Nos.367 and 368 of 2018




                                                                 Dated:
                                                           24.11.2023


https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter