Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 14434 Mad
Judgement Date : 21 November, 2023
CMA.No.2688 of 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 21.11.2023
CORAM: JUSTICE N.SESHASAYEE
CMA.Nos.2688 of 2023
& CMP.No.24922 of 2023
National Insurance Company Limited,
No.46, Moore Street, third floor,
Chennai – 600 001. ... Appellant
-Vs-
1.Sri Satheesh alias Sathishkumar
2.Rengabashyam ...Respondents
Prayer: Civil Miscellaneous Appeal filed under Section 173 of the
M.V.Act, 1988, against the Judgment and Decree passed in
MACT.OP.No.4702 of 2016, dated 21.08.2019, on the file of the Motor
Accidents Claims Tribunal, Special Subordinate Court, Chennai.
For Appellant : M/s.N.B.Sureka
For R1 : Mr.K.Varadhakamaraj
For R2 : Notice D/w Vide order dt.03.11.2023
JUDGMENT
In a road accident, the first respondent herein suffered injuries, when the
motorcycle bearing Regn.No.TN 07 BV 8499 which he was riding at the
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
relevant time collided with another motorcycle bearing Regn.No.TN 09
BS 0991. The vehicle belongs to the second respondent herein, which the
claimant had borrowed.
2.In the accident, the claimant suffered injuries and seeking
compensation he moved the Tribunal with MCOP.No.4702 of 2016 on
the file of the MACT, Special Sub Court No.2, Chennai against the
owner of the vehicle, which he rode and its insurance company. The
Tribunal determined the compensation at Rs.50,000/- and fastened the
liability on the owner and also the insurance company of the vehicle.
Challenging that the insurance company is not liable for the injuries
suffered by the owner or any borrower from the owner of the vehicle, the
appellant/insurance company has come forward with this appeal.
3.Relying on the ratio in M/s.National Insurance Company Limited Vs.
Srimathi Sudha and others., [CMA.No.3404 of 2019] the learned
counsel for the appellant submitted that the liability of the insurance
company vis-a-vis the owner of the vehicle or anyone who steps into the
shoes of the owner of the vehicle is purely contractual and neither
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Section 163A of the Motor Vehicles Act as it was then or its replacement
provision in Section 164 as is now provides any compensation by the
insurance company for the owner of the vehicle.
4.This Court has little hesitation in concluding that this case falls
squarely in the ambit of the case referred to above, since there is no PA
cover as between the owner/rider of the vehicle and the
appellant/insurance company.
5.In conclusion, this appeal is allowed and the Judgment and Decree
passed in MACT.OP.No.4702 of 2016 on 21.08.2019 by the Motor
Accident Claims Tribunal, Special Sub Court No.2, Chennai is hereby set
aside. No costs. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition is
closed.
21.11.2023
Tsg
To
1.The Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Special Subordinate Court, Chennai.
2.The Section Officer, V.R.Section, High Court, Madras.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
N.SESHASAYEE, J.,
Tsg
21.11.2023
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!