Wednesday, 20, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

V.Ponnusamy vs The State Of Tamil Nadu
2023 Latest Caselaw 14259 Mad

Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 14259 Mad
Judgement Date : 9 November, 2023

Madras High Court
V.Ponnusamy vs The State Of Tamil Nadu on 9 November, 2023
                                                                        W.P(MD)No.1743 of 2016


                          BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

                                            DATED: 09.11.2023

                                                    CORAM :

                         THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.LAKSHMINARAYANAN

                                             W.P(MD)No.1743 of 2016
                                                      and
                                            W.M.P.(MD)No.1508 of 2016

                V.Ponnusamy                                             ... Petitioner
                                                       Vs.

                1.The State of Tamil Nadu,
                  Rep., by its Principal Secretary to Government,
                  Revenue Department, Secretariat,
                  Chennai.

                2.The Additional Chief Secretary / Commissioner
                      of Revenue Administration,
                  Chepauk, Chennai.

                3.The District Collector,
                  Theni District, Theni.

                4.The District Revenue Officer,
                  O/o. The Collectorate,
                  Theni, Theni District.

                5.S.Anbu Chezhian
                6.S.Baskaran
                7.R.Mangani
                8.S.Surulivel
                9.K.Jeyabarathi
                10.M.Indira
                11.A.Akila
                12.V.Nagarajan
                13.R.Velmurugan

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                1/6
                                                                                        W.P(MD)No.1743 of 2016


                14.A.Sivakumar
                15.P.Murugan
                16.V.Sivankalai
                17.K.Nagarajan
                18.M.Pongudalingam
                19.M.Muthunavarethinam                                            ... Respondents


                PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India,
                praying this Court to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the
                records relating to the impugned seniority list issued by the 3rd respondent in
                his proceedings in Na.Ka.No.A2/34888/2013, dated 31.07.2015 and quash the
                same as illegal and consequentially to direct the respondents to fix the seniority
                of the petitioner above than the private respondents herein in the light of the
                order dated 02.04.2006 passed by this Court in the batch of Writ Petitions in
                W.P.No.21654 of 2004 and W.P.No.3822 of 2006 etc.,.


                                           For Petitioners      : M/s.A.Shapna,
                                                                 For M/s.Ajmal Associates
                                           For R1 to R4         :Mr.T.Amjadkhan, Government Advocate
                                           For R5, R8, R10 to
                                             R13, R15 to R19 : No Appearance

                                                             ORDER

The writ petitioner at the time of filing the Writ Petition was working

as Revenue Assistant. He was initially appointed as a Typist on 09.09.2009.

Prior to his appointment on 15.11.2007, a notification was issued by the Tamil

Nadu Public Service Commission (TNPSC), in which the petitioner participated

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

W.P(MD)No.1743 of 2016

in the examinations on 27.01.2008. The results of the examinations were

published on 07.11.2008 and the appointment order was issued on 16.07.2009.

This is the past history of the petitioner joined services of the 1st respondent.

2.Insofar as the private respondents, namely, respondents 5 to 19 are

concerned, they were originally appointed in the year 2003 and to meet the

exigencies, which were prevailing during the relevant point of time, the private

respondents were purely appointed on temporary basis. By an order dated

19.09.2006, the 1st respondent decided to absorb the candidates, who had been

working in terms of the appointment order issued on 04.07.2003.

Consequentially, the TNPSC issued a notification on 06.11.2007, stating that it

will conduct special qualifying examinations for the private respondents and

the persons similarly situated. The private respondents wrote the examinations

on 07.02.2008 and they were absorbed in service in the cadre of Junior

Assistant on 27.05.2009. They were promoted to the post of Assistant with

effect from 31.08.2012.

3.From the narration of the aforesaid facts, it is clear that the

petitioner joined in service only on 09.09.2009 as a Typist, whereas the private

respondents joined services on 27.05.2009. In other words, even before the

petitioner was appointed, the private respondents were already working.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

W.P(MD)No.1743 of 2016

4.The grievance of the writ petitioner is that the private respondents

have been shown as seniors to the writ petitioner. The learned counsel for the

writ petitioner relies upon G.O.(Ms)No.548, Personnel and Administrative

Reforms (PERCJ) Department, dated 19.06.1987. According to her, the

persons, who were appointed through TNPSC should be placed as seniors to

those who had been appointed under General Rule 10a(1). She also relies upon

the judgment of the Division Bench of the Principal Seat of this Court in

W.P.No.21654 of 2004, dated 03.04.2006.

5.I heard M/s.A.Shapna, learned counsel appearing for the writ

petitioner and Mr.T.Amjadkhan, learned Government Advocate appearing for

the respondents 1 to 4.

6.I am unable to agree with the learned counsel for the petitioner for

the simple reason that G.O.(Ms)No.548, dated 19.06.1987 was issued for

addressing the specific contingency that arose due to special absorption that

had been conducted in the year 1984. The common order in W.P.No.21654 of

2004 and W.P.No.3822 of 2006, dated 03.04.2006 also related to the said

special absorption of the year 1984. The said Government Order cannot be

extended to the persons like the writ petitioner or the private respondents

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

W.P(MD)No.1743 of 2016

herein. Mere fact that the petitioner had secured employment in the 1st

respondent through TNPSC does not place him as superior to the persons, who

had already been appointed before him in the very same cadre.

7.A perusal of the said order dated 03.04.2006 passed by the Division

Bench of this Court makes it clear that as it was the case of special absorption

of the year 1984, this Court had ordered by following G.O.(Ms)No.548, dated

19.06.1987 that the persons, who had been appointed by TNPSC should be

placed above to those who had been appointed by special absorption in the year

1984. That being one time measure, it cannot be applied for all cases.

Therefore, both the points are failed and I am unable to grant the relief, the writ

petitioner seeks for.

8.Accordingly, this Writ Petition stands dismissed. No costs.

Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.




                                                                                09.11.2023
                NCC      : Yes / No
                Index : Yes / No
                Internet : Yes / No

                Yuva



https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

                                                                          W.P(MD)No.1743 of 2016




                                                             V.LAKSHMINARAYANAN, J

                                                                                         Yuva


                To

1.The Principal Secretary to Government, State of Tamil Nadu, Revenue Department, Secretariat, Chennai.

2.The Additional Chief Secretary / Commissioner of Revenue Administration, Chepauk, Chennai.

3.The District Collector, Theni District, Theni.

4.The District Revenue Officer, O/o. The Collectorate, Theni, Theni District.

W.P(MD)No.1743 of 2016

09.11.2023

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter