Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 14180 Mad
Judgement Date : 3 November, 2023
W.P(MD)No.22817 of 2023
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED : 03.11.2023
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.VIJAYAKUMAR
W.P(MD)No.22817 of 2023
V.Murugaiah ... Petitioner
Vs.
1.The District Collector,
Tenkasi District,
Tenkasi.
2.The Block Development Officer,
Vasuthevanallur Panchayat Union,
Tenkasi District.
3.The Panchayat President,
Sangupuram Panchayat,
Vasuthevanallur Union,
Tenkasi District. ... Respondents
Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India,
praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents 1
and 2 to revoke the order of suspension passed by the third respondent vide his
proceedings in Na.Ka.No.01/2021, dated 16.11.2021 in the light of the
judgment passed by the Hon'ble Apex Court in Ajaykumar Chowdhary Vs.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
1/5
W.P(MD)No.22817 of 2023
Union of India as well as Government Letter, dated 23.07.2015 based on the
petitioner's representation, dated 26.04.2023 and 23.08.2023 in person.
For Petitioner : Mr.K.Sankar
For R-1 & R-2 : Mr.J.Ashok
Additional Government Pleader
ORDER
The present writ petition has been filed by a Panchayat Secretary
challenging the order of suspension, dated 16.11.2021 on the ground it is
prolonged for the past two years.
2. The learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner further submitted that
the Panchayat President has no jurisdiction whatsoever to pass an order of
suspension and only the P.A to District Collector has got jurisdiction.
3. Per contra, the learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for
the respondents 1 and 2 pointed out that the Tamil Nadu Village Panchayat
Secretaries (Conditions of Service) Rule, 2013 has been stayed by this Court
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
W.P(MD)No.22817 of 2023
and therefore, Panchayat President continues to be the appointing authority,
who has got powers to suspend the writ petitioner.
4. Considering the fact that the petitioner was arrested in a trap case, it is
for the third respondent to consider the request of the petitioner for revocation
of the order of suspension.
5. In case if any representation is made by the writ petitioner for
revocation of suspension, the third respondent is directed to consider the same
on merits and in accordance with law and pass orders, within a period of eight
(8) weeks from the date of receipt of such representation.
6. With the above said observation, this writ petition stands disposed of.
There shall be no order as to costs.
03.11.2023
NCC : Yes / No
Index : Yes / No
Internet : Yes
BTR
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
W.P(MD)No.22817 of 2023
To
1.The District Collector, Tenkasi District, Tenkasi.
2.The Block Development Officer, Vasuthevanallur Panchayat Union, Tenkasi District.
3.The Panchayat President, Sangupuram Panchayat, Vasuthevanallur Union, Tenkasi District.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
W.P(MD)No.22817 of 2023
R.VIJAYAKUMAR, J.
BTR
W.P(MD)No.22817 of 2023
03.11.2023
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!