Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 6969 Mad
Judgement Date : 23 June, 2023
W.P. No. 18308 of 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 23.06.2023
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE S. VAIDYANATHAN
AND
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. RAJASEKAR
W.P. No. 18308 of 2023
&
W.M.P. No. 17512 of 2023
1. M/s. Royal Educational Trust,
Having its Administrative Office,
at No.16/177 A, Palakkad Main Road,
Marappallam, Madukkarai,
Coimbatore 641 105 rep. by its
Managing Trustee, A. Gunasingh
2. A. Gunasingh,
Managing Trustee of
M/s. Royal Educational Trust,
S/o. Late A.Azariah Nadar,
No.16/177A, Palakkad Main Road,
Marappallam, Madukkarai,
Coimbatore 641 105 ..Petitioners
Vs.
1\4
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
W.P. No. 18308 of 2023
The Authorized Officer,
M/s. Union Bank of India,
Erstwhile Corporation Bank,
Assets Recovery Branch,
Oppanakara Street,
Coimbatore 641 001. ..Respondent
Prayer: Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying
for issue of a Writ Cetiorari to call for the records pertaining to the
impugned notice in reference AAB/13(2)/21/2022-23 dated 27.01.2023
issued by the respondent which notice is the 2nd notice issued under Section
13(2) of the SARFAESI Act by the respondent without recalling their
earlier notice issued under Section 13(2) of the Act, dated 30.10.2012 and
quash the impugned notice dated 27.01.2023 and consequent further
proceedings.
For Petitioners :: Mr.V. Jayachandran
ORDER
(By S. Vaidyanathan,J.)
The writ petition has been filed challenging the notice dated
30.10.2012 issued by the respondent under Section 13(2) of Securitisation
2\4
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P. No. 18308 of 2023
and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security
Interest Act, 2002 ('SARFAESI' Act in short).
2. Admittedly, as against the notice issued by the 2nd respondent
under Section 13(2) of Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial
Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 ('SARFAESI' Act in
short), the petitioners have got an effective alternate remedy by way of
statutory appeal under Section 17 of SARFAESI Act before the Debts
Recovery Tribunal. There are a catena of judgments holding that High
Courts cannot be alternative remedial Courts in such matters. Hence, the
relief sought by the petitioners cannot be granted.
3. Though the learned counsel for the petitioners produeced an
undertaking affidavit before this Court stating that the petitioners are
willing to pay a sum of Rs.1.75 crores in five instalments, it is for the
respondent Bank to consider the same.
3\4
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P. No. 18308 of 2023
S. VAIDYANATHAN,J.
AND
K. RAJASEKAR,J.
nv
4. The writ petition stands dismissed with liberty to the petitioners
to approach the appropriate forum. No costs. Connected W.M.P. is closed.
(S.V.N.J.) (K.R.S.J.) nv 23.06.2023
To The Authorized Officer, M/s. Union Bank of India, Erstwhile Corporation Bank, Assets Recovery Branch, Oppanakara Street, Coimbatore 641 001.
W.P. No. 18308 of 2023
4\4
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!