Tuesday, 19, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

K.Gowthaman vs The Government Of Tamil Nadu
2023 Latest Caselaw 6756 Mad

Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 6756 Mad
Judgement Date : 21 June, 2023

Madras High Court
K.Gowthaman vs The Government Of Tamil Nadu on 21 June, 2023
                                                                              W.P.No.27840 of 2022


                                  IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                                              DATED : 21.06.2023
                                                   CORAM:
                                    THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.S.RAMESH

                                            W.P.No.27840 of 2022
                                                    and
                                        WMP.Nos.27122 & 27124 of 2022

                    K.Gowthaman                                          ...Petitioner

                                                         Vs.

                    1.The Government of Tamil Nadu
                      rep. by its Secretary,
                      Department of Higher Education,
                      Secretariat, Chennai.

                    2.The Commissioner of Technical Education,
                      Directorate of Technical Education,
                      Sardar Patel Road, Guindy,
                      Chennai-600 025.

                    3.The Principal,
                      Government Polytechnic College,
                      Arakandanallur,
                      Villupuram District.                               ...Respondents

                    PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of
                    India, praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents
                    to regularize 10 long years service of the petitioner as Lecturer in
                    Mechanical Engineering in the Department of Mechanical Engineering
                    at third respondent Government Polytechnic College, Villupuram as the
                    extension of one time measure given in the judgment of Hon'ble
                    Supreme Court reported in 2006 (4) SCC 1.
                                      For Petitioner   : Mr.Singaravelan, Sr. Counsel
                                                         for Mr.M.Muruganantham

                                        For Respondent   : Mr.P.Baladhandayutham,
                                        Nos.1 & 2          Special Government Pleader


                    1/5

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                                                                                   W.P.No.27840 of 2022




                                                          ORDER

The petitioner herein had given representations to the

respondents requesting them to regularize 10 long years of her service

as Lecturer in Mechanicl Engineering in the Department of Mechanical

Engineering at the third respondent Government Polytechnic College,

Villupuram. Since the said representations were not considered, the

present Writ Petition has been filed.

2. It is needless to point out that whenever a representation of

this nature is made to a Statutory Authority, there is a duty cast upon

the respondents to consider the same on its own merits and pass

appropriate orders in one way or other, instead of keeping the same

pending indefinitely. As such, non-consideration of the representation

by the Statutory Authority would amount to dereliction of duty and

hence, this Court will be justified in invoking its extraordinary powers

under Article 226 of Constitution of India and direct them to consider

the same within a stipulated time.

3. Since the representations were given long back by the

petitioner, it would be appropriate that the petitioner be granted

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.27840 of 2022

liberty to give a fresh representation, with a consequential direction to

the respondents to consider the same, thereby securing the ends of

justice.

4. In the light of the above observations, the petitioner is

granted liberty to give a fresh representation to the respondents

herein, ventilating his grievances. On receipt of such a representation,

the respondents shall consider it and pass appropriate orders in

accordance with law, within a period of three months from the date of

receipt of such representation. Till such a disposal of the petitioner's

representation, the respondents shall not disturb the petitioner's

services. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any of its

views with regard to the merits of the claim made by the petitioner

and it is open to the respondents to consider it on its own merits.

5. With the above direction, this Writ Petition stands disposed of.

Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petitions are closed. There

shall be no order as to costs.

21.06.2023 Index:Yes/No Order :Speaking / Non Speaking Neutral Citation :Yes / No

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.27840 of 2022

DP

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.27840 of 2022

M.S.RAMESH,J.

DP

To

1.The Secretary, Government of Tamil Nadu Department of Higher Education, Secretariat, Chennai.

2.The Commissioner of Technical Education, Directorate of Technical Education, Sardar Patel Road, Guindy, Chennai-600 025.

W.P.No.27840 of 2022 and WMP.No.27122 & 27124 of 2022

21.06.2023

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter