Wednesday, 20, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

The Managing Director vs Geetha
2023 Latest Caselaw 5509 Mad

Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 5509 Mad
Judgement Date : 6 June, 2023

Madras High Court
The Managing Director vs Geetha on 6 June, 2023
                                                                           C.M.A(MD)No.249 of 2019



                           BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

                                                DATED: 06.06.2023

                                                     CORAM

                                  THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE R.VIJAYAKUMAR

                                            C.M.A(MD)No.249 of 2019
                                                     and
                                            C.M.P(MD)No.3450 of 2019

                     The Managing Director,
                     M/s.Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation
                      (Madurai) Ltd.,
                     Bye Pass Road,
                     Madurai-625 010.                        ... Appellant/Respondent

                                                        Vs.

                     1.Geetha

                     2.Dhivya

                     3.Vivekanandan

                     4.Nagarethinam                            ... Respondents/Petitioners

                     PRAYER: Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is filed under Section 173 of
                     Motor Vehicles Act, to set aside the award and decree made in
                     M.C.O.P.No.4390 of 2013, dated 12.10.2017 on the file of the Motor
                     Accident Claims Tribunal / Special District Court, Tiruchirappalli.


                                     For Appellant    : Mr.P.Prabhakaran

                                     For Respondents : No Appearance

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis




                     1/6
                                                                                C.M.A(MD)No.249 of 2019

                                                         JUDGMENT

The present appeal has been filed by the transport corporation

challenging negligence and quantum.

2. According to the learned counsel appearing for the appellant,

the deceased is said to be a pedestrian who was walking on the Trichy

Chennai Bye-pass road at about 10.00 p.m., on 09.03.2008. According to

the claimants, a bus belonging to the transport corporation had dashed

against the deceased person and he had succumbed to the injuries. The

claimants have contended that the deceased was a Fitter and Pump

Operator working in Trichy Distilleries & Chemicals Limited company

and he was drawing a salary of Rs.7,000/- per month. The

claimants prayed for a compensation of Rs.10,00,000/-.

3. The transport corporation has filed a counter contending that in

the F.I.R., the vehicle number was mentioned as TN 74 N 10. However,

at the time of filing of claim petition, the claimants have mentioned the

vehicle number as TN 74 N 1042. Therefore, they have questioned the

involvement of the bus belonging to the transport corporation in the

accident. The transport corporation has also questioned the quantum of

compensation as prayed for by the claimants. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

C.M.A(MD)No.249 of 2019

4. The tribunal after considering the oral and documentary

evidence and relying upon the deposition of the driver of the bus that the

said bus was driven during the relevant point of time in the Chennai-

Nagercoil bypass road, arrived at a finding that the bus was involved in

the said accident. Only due to inadvertence, the last two numbers were

not mentioned in the F.I.R. The tribunal further found that the claimants

have not established their employment and monthly salary and fixed the

notional income at Rs.5,000/-. Based upon the said notional monthly

income, the tribunal had deducted 1/4th towards personal expenses and

arrived at loss of dependency at Rs.5,85,000/-. The tribunal has further

awarded a sum of Rs.10,000/- towards funeral and transportation

expenses and a sum of Rs.3,00,000/- towards loss of love and

affection. The tribunal has further awarded a sum of Rs.1,00,000/-

towards loss of consortium. In total, a sum of Rs.9,95,000/- has been

awarded towards compensation. This award is under challenge in the

present appeal.

5. According to the learned counsel appearing for the

appellant/transport corporation, the tribunal has not properly appreciated

the stand taken by the corporation that the vehicle number has not been

properly mentioned in the F.I.R. However, this Court is not inclined to https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis accept the said contention in view of the deposition made on the side of

C.M.A(MD)No.249 of 2019

the driver of the transport corporation, who was examined as R.W.1.

6. As rightly pointed out by the learned counsel appearing for the

appellant, the tribunal has awarded a sum of Rs.3,00,000/- towards loss

of love and affection and another sum of Rs.1,00,000/- towards loss of

consortium which seems to be in the higher side. In view of the above

said facts, this Court is inclined to modify the award in the following

manner:

                                  Loss of dependency              : Rs.5,85,000/-

                                  Funeral expenses                : Rs. 20,000/-

                                  Transportation charges          : Rs. 10,000/-

                                  Loss of consortium              : Rs. 40,000/-

                                  Loss of love and affection to the

                                   claimants 2 to 4               : Rs.1,20,000/-

                                                                  ------------------

                                  Total                           : Rs.7,75,000/-



7. In view of the above said deliberations, the award of the tribunal

is modified and reduced from Rs.9,95,000/- (Rupees Nine Lakh and

Ninety Five Thousand only) to Rs.7,75,000/- (Rupees Seven Lakh and

Seventy Five Thousand only). Out of the said award amount, the 1 st https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis claimant would be entitled to a sum of Rs.3,00,000/- and the 2nd claimant

C.M.A(MD)No.249 of 2019

shall be entitled to a sum of Rs.2,00,000/-. The balance amount shall be

shared by the claimants 3 and 4 equally.

8. With the said observations, this Civil Miscellaneous Appeal

stands allowed to the extent as stated above. No costs. Consequently,

connected Civil Miscellaneous Petition is closed.




                                                                                  06.06.2023
                     NCC             :    Yes / No
                     Index           :    Yes / No
                     Internet        :    Yes / No

                     gbg


                     To

1.The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal / Special District Court, Tiruchirappalli.

2.The Section Officer, Vernacular Section, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

C.M.A(MD)No.249 of 2019

R.VIJAYAKUMAR,J.

gbg

Judgment made in C.M.A(MD)No.249 of 2019

06.06.2023

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter