Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 8804 Mad
Judgement Date : 21 July, 2023
C.R.P.(MD).No.1932 of 2016
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED : 21.07.2023
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPAN
C.R.P.(NPD)(MD)No.1932 of 2016
1. Mangaiyarkarasi
2. Punithavalli
3. Valli,
4. Karpagavalli
5. Sivasakthi. ... Petitioners/Appellants 2, 4 to 7
Petitioners 2, 4 to 7
-vs-
1. Venkatapathy
2. Singaravelu ... Respondents 1 and 2/Respondents 1 &2
/Respondents 1 and 2
3. Sridharan
4. Sankar
5. Subha ... Respondents 3 to 5 in C.R.P (LR of
Gnanapoongothai/
3rd Petitioner in R.C.O.P .
PRAYER: Civil Revision Petition is filed under Section 25 of the Tamil
Nadu Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1960, against the judgment
and decree in R.C.A.No.19 of 2003, dated 30.10.2006 on the file of the
Appellate Rent Controller/Principal Subordinate Judge, Kumbakonam
confirming the fair and decreetal order in R.C.O.P.No.12 of 1996, dated
08.04.2003 on the file of the Rent Control Court-cum-Principal District
Munsif Court, Kumbakonam.
1/4
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
C.R.P.(MD).No.1932 of 2016
For Petitioners : No appearance
For Respondents : No appearance
ORDER
When the matter came up for hearing, there is no representation on
either side.
2. On perusal of the order sheet dated 22.06.2023, it is seen that, the
learned counsel appearing for the revision petitioners reported no instructions
from the petitioners and he has also filed a memo to that effect. Hence, this
Court ordered notice to the petitioners returnable by 13.07.2023. When the
notice was issued to the petitioners, the notice sent to the petitioners 1, 2, 3
and 5 returned with an endorsement as “vacated, no such person, insufficient
address and not known” respectively. In respect of 4th petitioner, name was
printed in the cause list, and no one appeared on behalf of her.
3. Therefore, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioners in
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis C.R.P.(MD).No.1932 of 2016
spite of notice was issued upon them which could not be served, in view of
the reasons stated herein above.
4. On perusal of the records, this civil revision petition arising out of
the order passed by the learned Rent Control Appellate Tribunal. Since there
is no representation for the petitioners and upon the reason that the
petitioners' counsel already reported no instructions, there is no purpose in
keeping this revision petition on file.
5. Hence, this Civil Revision Petition is dismissed for default. There
shall be no order as to costs.
21.07.2023
NCC : Yes/No
Index : Yes / No
Internet : Yes / No
ebsi
To
1. The Appellate Rent Controller/Principal Subordinate Judge, Kumbakonam.
2. The Rent Control Court cum Principal District Munsif Court, Kumbakonam.
C.KUMARAPPAN,J.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis C.R.P.(MD).No.1932 of 2016
ebsi
C.R.P(NPD)(MD)No. 1932 of 2016
21.07.2023
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!